Bellringer Angel Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Rules:-All Leaderboard rules apply.-First to 3 votes or most votes by the deadline wins.-All voters must elaborate on their votes.-Both contestants have the right to refuse votes, but must explain why they don't accept it.-Written cards are allowed. (Must be in written format, cards with blank pictures are not acceptable)-Cards must be PM'd to me.-Remove any evidence of the card being made by you to ensure anonymity.-In case a downtime happens, the deadlines may be extended. Rewards:-The winner gets a rep from the loser.-All voters get a rep for voting. Deadlines:-A 48 (maybe 72 if needed) hour deadline for a contestant to submit.-A week after the cards are submitted until the end of the 1v1. If there are no votes at this time, next vote will win. Requirement:Errata a banned card in the TCG banlist. The errata'd card becomes Semi-Limited. Card A:Effect Monster, DARK, Spellcaster-Type, 300 ATK, 300 DEFYou can pay 1000 LP; Special Summon 1 Level 6 or lower Fusion Monster from your Extra Deck. It cannot attack, and is returned to the Extra Deck during your End Phase. You can only activate this effect of "Magical Scientist" once per turn. Card B:Ultimate OfferingTrap, ContinuousOnce per turn, during your Main Phase or your opponent's Battle Phase: You can reveal 1 monster in your hand; immediately after this effect resolves, Normal Summon/Set that monster, and if you do, you lose LP equal to that monster's original ATK or DEF (whichever is higher). You can only control 1 face-up "Ultimate Offering". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 TCG Lol. =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Accepted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Btw, a question. Will the Errata banned card be treated as Unlimited again, or still Limited at 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Btw, a question. Will the Errata banned card be treated as Unlimited again, or still Limited at 1?At 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Wtf. At 2. Why not 3 or just 1. Why 2? This requirement is almost as stupid as some of the newer members trying 1v1. -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 Wtf. At 2. Why not 3 or just 1. Why 2? This requirement is almost as stupid as some of the newer members trying 1v1. -_- Because it's more interesting than at 1 or 3, but if you really want to, I might change it to 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 It's your choice as host. I just thought the semi-limited thing came out of nowhere, but you can keep it at 2 if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Cards folks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Cards folks?Yuuko didn't send me her card yet. More than 72 hours have passed since the first post, so this competition is open again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Lol, I had forgotten about this. Ugh, sorry. I've been too busy lately and I have to get back a disgusting loss from Abdel guy. Can someone else take my spot? And Potatoes just because. =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major's Shadow Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Seems odd w/ the Semi-Limited cap, but I'd be fine taking over. Ya know, if you accept the request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Seems odd w/ the Semi-Limited cap, but I'd be fine taking over. Ya know, if you accept the request. Go for it, and thanks. =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Seems odd w/ the Semi-Limited cap, but I'd be fine taking over. Ya know, if you accept the request. Request accepted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major's Shadow Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Go for it, and thanks. =3:33333 Request accepted!Sure, I'll submit the entry in just a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Cards are up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 I'm voting for Card B. This is because, even with the errata, Magical Scientist is still a Level 1 (and therefore 141-able, Kinka-Byo-able etc) Instant Fusion for Level 6 or lower rather than Level 5 or lower. I feel that it still has more potential than Instant Fusion (already a problem card) to be prohibitive on what Fusion monsters are made. The card is also an easy +1, fodder generator. The fact that you kept it returning to the Extra Deck is also a problem, as that makes it even easier to reuse a Limited TER for spot removal (every turn with Kinka Byo) if you don't want to go Rank 1. Card B, on the other hand, errata'd pretty much the only problem with Ultimate Offering: the lack of any OPT. (That was a problem for Magical Scientist too, but not the only problem.) It also increased the average amount of LP lost to use the effect, and made it weak to Mind Crush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Card A: 0Card B: 1 Any objection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuuji Kazami Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 He literally said that Magical Scientist is better than Instant Fusion. What has this world come to? Big, big problem there Lol. Saying that a reusable spot removal for 1 monster is broken is like saying that Kozmo Dark Destroyer is a God card. There's nothing wrong with Card A, as it puts you in a position of Instant Fusing at the cost of leaving a vulnerable monster in play. Having played the Level 1 troll deck with kinky cat, it had been quite fun messing around with it. I can't see scientist being a broken card nowadays at all considering that the synergy of most decks completely override this card's power. Not only that, the errata only made it more balanced. Card B is just disinteresting. If the Level 1 troll dek abuses Magical Scientist somehow, then Ultimate Offering would be the Monarch's love slave. NS Edea or Eidos and if Escalation was already on the field, your opponent would be hitting nothing in their turn because you can just keep summoning monarchs in response and remove all of their stuff. Since we already have the Arcana Force Monarch Deck now that skips your opponent's turn, I fail to see anymore use for more Monarch support. Magical Scientist, on the other hand, is much more interesting to see pull combos off as opposed to NSing more Monarchs on the spot. Technically, Offering is merely a better Escalation. I'll vote Card A for the fact that it supports more Decks in general as opposed to mainly Monarchs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Card A: 1Card B: 1 Any objection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted June 27, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2016 bump for votes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted July 5, 2016 Report Share Posted July 5, 2016 As the deadline for this contest passed a couple days ago, going to declare this a 1-1 tie and end it manually. (To be fair guys, you really should've been pushing for more voters) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.