Nathanael D. Striker Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Rules 1. All Leaderboard Rules Apply 2. Cards are due 48 hours after a challenge has been accepted. 3. First to 3 votes or most after 72 hours since voting has begun. 4. Votes must have a valid reason with a minimum of 2 sentences. 5. Winner gets 1 Rep from loser. 6. Card must be PM'd to me. Card Requirement Create a generic Machine-Type monster. Card A When this card is destroyed by battle: You can equip this card to a monster your opponent controls: That card cannot attack or change its battle position as long as this card is equipped to it. You can only use the effect of "Demobilization Capacitor - Kumo" once per Duel. Card B 2 Level 4 Monsters During either player's turn, if an opponent's card effect activates that would destroy a card(s) you control: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; negate the effect, and if you do, banish that card. You can only activate the effect of "Ruby Red Destructor" once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpticalGalaxyStar Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Bring it on. For the requirement, how about a generic Machine-Type monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted April 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Alright. Cards due at 3pm PT on 4/26/14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpticalGalaxyStar Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Bring it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted April 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 Show time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 Card A: It is weak. First, it has to be destroyed by battle, which is not a reliable activation condition anymore with all the effect removal available. Then, stopping the opponent's moster from atatcking is really underwhelming when there are other cards that can do the same but are faster and also have additional effects (e.g. Fiendish Chain). Finally, the "once per duel" restriction is unecesary for such weak effect. Card B: A generic Xyz that protects from any kind of destruction? Yes, please. And as a bonus, it banishes the negated card. The card is really good, and I'm not sure if it would be actually broken. If anything, its ATK may be a bit too high considering that it already has a good DEF; for instance, I think an ATK around 1800 would have been more fair by disabling its offensive capabilities, and its outsanding DEF implies that it should be used defensively anyways. I vote for Card B because it is great generic Rank 4. Even if it happens to be actually broken, at least it is way more useful than Card A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted April 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 0-1 Card B Thanks for voting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RampageXWolf Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 Card A is stupid, why the weak effect that completely outclassed by Fiendish has once per duel clause? not to mention destroyed by battle is rare nowadays. Card B is broken for generic, its stat are high, and that effect is really good, I suggest 2 Materials detached for it. normally I'd vote for balance card in opposed to useful card, but this time Card A is just too suck, so Card B got my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 As stated, Card A = useless junk, while Card B has both decent stat and powerful effect, if only Card A isn't so useless I would vote it, but as it I vote Card B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted April 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 0-3 Card B (Striker) Thanks for the 1v1, Optical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpticalGalaxyStar Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 H-Holy cow... I didn't realize it was that bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.