Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Rules 1. All YCM and Leaderboard Rules Apply 2. Cards must be PM'd to me. 3. First to 3 votes or most by the deadline wins. 4. Votes must have a detailed explanation 4a. Good voters get rep 5. Winner gets 1 Rep from loser. 6. Written Cards are NOT allowed. 7. If you're reading point 7, it means that now i'm in my bed, sleeping and dreaming a world free of war, cruelty... and bujin players that still can't understand how the f*ck Ceruli works....in other words, i'll read when I'll wake up. The first that wants to challeng me in this 1on1 and writes it in the thread, can consider himself\herself the official contestant Deadline Card must be PM'd to me by 48 hours after I accepted the challenge Votes' Deadline is 72 hours after cards are up Task: Make a card (any kind of card on Earth) whose lore contains, properly in a logical way, the following phrases\words (but not mandatory in the order they're desplayed): 1) "in your" 2) "target 1 Normal" 3) "because" Card A [spoiler='A'] Once per turn, while this card is face-up on your side of the field or in your Graveyard; Target 1 Normal Monster you control: Special Summon a copy of that monster as a Token, it is destroyed during the End-Phase. When a Token you control is removed from the field because of an opponents card effect: Special Summon 1 level 4 or lower Normal Monster from your Graveyard.[/spoiler] Card B [spoiler='B'] When a monster effect is activated, if this card is in your Graveyard because it was discarded by a card effect: You can Special Summon this card in face-up Attack Position; negate the activation and discard 1 card, then draw 1 card (this is a Quick Effect). If this card is discarded from your hand to your Graveyard by an opponent's card effect: You can banish this card to target 1 Normal Spell Card in your Graveyard; add the target to your hand.[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 "because" is not a word that exists in OCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 "because" is not a word that exists in OCG. It is a word that exists in the English language though, and since the set seems to involve Normal Monsters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 just to make an example http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Bujintei_Tsukuyomi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 just to make an example http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Bujintei_Tsukuyomi As far as I'm aware, that is the only time "because" has ever been used. It's always been "destroyed by your opponent's card (by battle or by card effect)". Konami's bad at card text consistency >.> "Because" of such, correct OCG would demand that it is the only time it can be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 there are other different cases too, but i cannot name them because i would give some advantage\idea to my eventual opponent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 *DN Search "because"* Because is legit, I believe. Wait aren't you already in a 1v1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 i can be on 2 at same time since i'm behinde top 3...so, anyone in? Ok i'll make the requirement more affordable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 so no one got enough skill for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 accepted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 oh! finally! It's not that hard after all is it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Nope :3 PMing now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 wao! you were a flash! cards are up, Vote! (click on show to see the pics) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Card A can't do anything so much, why my opponent would do sth to my token if their know that the token will pop itself during the EP? well at least it help Synchro and Tribute Summoning, but I think this is pretty weak, also its OCG is TOO easy (though I think I have no problem understanding what's that 'copy') but when I saw Card B, I instantly have no words here, just what!? while Card A is weak, Card B is insanely broken, + 2 plus a divine wrath-esque? (to any of you who make it, pls don't arguing with me that discarding for DW is -1, also supporting an archetype that ruin Yugioh and furthermore broke the already broken archetype is a bad idea imo) so even it's weak, I have to vote Card A due to Card B's absurd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Well Card A is quite interesting as a Synchro Support/Tribute Support. I'm not even kidding, the fact that it's triggerable from the graveyard is really neat. And for Card B, it's a huge boon for DW. Too huge, if I may say. It's a +1 Veiler at minimum, and with Gates, you can set it up easily. The fact that it can trigger other DWs, and it can situationally recycle spells made it even more crazy. I vote for A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 2-0 Card A! thanks for voting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 A Veiler from the grave that goes into a +0 that can trigger other DWs and can be set up by Gates? WHAT Card A isn't too insane, and like Ain said, it can be pretty good synchro support. I mean, easy level 9s or 10s, easy tributes, go for it have fun I guess. It's not a good card and it doesn't have a place in the meta as-is (except maybe Hieratics and BW decks), but it's still an interesting concept. Because it ISN'T a badly designed, cheap, broken, easily set up support for an archetype that doesn't really need support and just needs to cover it's weakness, vote goes to A. Congrats SoulFire for your deserving wi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Lol!! nothing personal HᴇʀᴢGᴇɪsᴛ but i think you won due to the conspiracy at my damage. Your card wasn't so good, the ocg was wrong and it was not even that useful...my card instead, yes is strong, but i've seen card more overpowered getting votes around here. And Dark Worlds need real support if they want to keep the archetype alive...and that support of course it's not that stupid Celt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 keep the DW alive!? u must jk, isn't this archetype still be the top deck due to their tyranny boss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 hogwash... most easily counterable archetype EVER! Tons of card that kill it, and a part from this presently it can't compare with other recent decks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Still, it's by no means justified an in theme +1 Veiler that can easily be set-up and furthers your combo. Having something like this in other archetypes will still make me puke. Oh, by the way, deck being counterable does not mean it's ok to give them broken counterable support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 just ask urself, is there another recent decks boss which is a +1 3k out of nowhere, just admit it, Grapha is the worst designed card EVER (well, not worst considering Rulers' babies...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 hogwash... most easily counterable archetype EVER! Tons of card that kill it, and a part from this presently it can't compare with other recent decks Alright, you're still intent on thinking that you lost because we're conspiring? Let's, for a moment, take away the DW name, the DW set up, the last effect, ok? Now it's a re-usable Veiler from the grave with a 1900 body. That on its own would've been a ridiculously good card. Sets up for plays, makes easy Xyzs, Synchros, Tributes and offers solid field coverage because of it's high ATK. Everybody would run it, simply because it's a better Veiler that can be set up through Foolish Burial. AND THEN, you get to the Dark World Dealings-esque effect. After setting up a play just by summoning it, you get to either: Set up the grave or get rid of a useless card, only for it to replaced by something that, no matter what, would be advantageous. Putting a card like this on an archetype that benefits from discarding is a bad idea and you should get that moronic "MY CARD ISN'T THAT BAD HIS CARD WAS SLIGHTLY WORSE NYEH NYEH BOO HOO" logic out of your head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 You're wrong, just ask yourself, what would be dark world be without grapha? The answer is [spoiler='Answer']Almost pile of crap.[/spoiler] So grapha is necessary to make DW a strong archetype....and some time ago grapha was enough for this aim, but now it isn't anymore. Consider that the veiler thing is not that broken since DWs fear much more spells\traps, and monsters effects are not that big problem for DWs that run drainx3....a part from this is just some kind of dealings, however if the eff negation doesn't resolve properly along with the discard, there is no draw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwisatz-Haderach Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 simply because it's a better Veiler that can be set up through Foolish Burial. You jackass! I will invalidate your vote since you didn't read my card correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.