[Leaderboard] - TechGenusMaster wins

[Thar]

Rules:

1. First to 3 votes or most votes by given deadline wins.
2. All reviews must be somewhat decent (2 lines minimum.)
3. Winner gets 1 +Like

Card Requirements:

Make a Trap Card that targets monsters that were Special Summoned.

Deadline:

[spoiler=Card A]


When a monster is Special Summoned to your opponent's side of the field: Target that monster, and if you do, it can not attack during the turn it is Summoned, and it loses 1000 ATK and DEF until the end of your next turn.
[/spoiler]

[spoiler=Card B]


Can only be activated when your opponent Special Summons a monster: Treat this card as an Equip Spell card and equip it to that monster. Negate the effects of monsters equipped with this card.
[/spoiler]

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I might join, depending on the concrete meaning of "Anti-Xyz."

I know a couple examples of Anti Xyz, but I wanted to be sure. (Duston, Galaxy Eyes, etc.)

[Thar]

I might join, depending on the concrete meaning of "Anti-Xyz."

I know a couple examples of Anti Xyz, but I wanted to be sure. (Duston, Galaxy Eyes, etc.)

 

A card that Xyz users would be scared of.

[The Warden]

I'll play

[Thar]

I'll play

 

Well, alright then. You're in.

[The Warden]

Eh, cna only be in 1 1v1 at a time, I'll sub out of this.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Does that mean I can join? I'm up for it.

[Mugendramon]

Thar if I were you I'd choose a better requirement. There's so much anti-Xyz shit going around that I at least would honestly be discouraged from making something interesting.

[Thar]

Thar if I were you I'd choose a better requirement. There's so much anti-Xyz shit going around that I at least would honestly be discouraged from making something interesting.

 

EDITED:

 

"Make a Trap Card that targets monsters that were Special Summoned."

 

Does that mean I can join? I'm up for it.

 

Yes, you're in. PM your card to me when you're ready.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Oh. Now it's a trap card. I had an idea in mind for the Anti Xyz, but I have nothing for the Trap. I might back out. Sorry. =/

[Mugendramon]

Oh. Now it's a trap card. I had an idea in mind for the Anti Xyz, but I have nothing for the Trap. I might back out. Sorry. =/

 

Speaks leagues of your creative capabilities. I say just give it a shot, what's the worst that could happen?

 

This event is about improving your card making anyway.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Ok, I'll try.

Entry submitted!

[Thar]

Cards are up. Let the voting begin! Good luck, TGM.

 

[quote]Oh. Now it's a trap card. I had an idea in mind for the Anti Xyz, but I have nothing for the Trap. I might back out. Sorry. =/[/quote]

 

Yeah, so did I. 'But it sucked, so I'm glad the suggestion was made to change it.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Hehe. Let's see how my first battle goes....*explodes*

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Okay, this is essentially attack prevention (with a weakener on the side) vs effect negation.

 

Card A does even out those strong monsters with its weakener effect. Also, it prevents it from causing damage through battle. I don't see many problems with this card, though I may be missing something with its weakener effect. Though, the temporary factor calms some worries.

 

Card B does nicely with its effect negation. I like how the effect negation is permanent as long as this card is equipped. Also, this does work nicely as MST bait. TBH, I don't see much wrong with this card either.

 

Based on personal preference, I vote Card B. I prefer effect negation compared to attack prevention, though Card A does alright for its intended purpose.

[Thar]

1 - 0, Card B.

 

Thanks for voting.

[Maeriberii Haan]

Compared to other summon response/chainable traps, both Card A and B seems underwhelming since Fiendish Chain exists. But honestly, both filled different purposes, and since Card B overlaps too much with Fiendish Chain, Card A seems to be more interesting.

 

Well, vote to Card A, though Card B would be more likely to be used, Card A filled its own niche, while Card B is a poor man's Fiendish Chain.

[Thar]

1 - 1

 

Thanks for voting. Tie game so far.

[mikel.]

Card B, get's my vote. On why, like said:

 

I like how the effect negation is permanent as long as this card is equipped

there is a wall given to the opponent, where the opponent would either have to get rid of the monster/ MST the trap.  

Card A, Though it's depending it's just too much tipped over leaving the monster fully capable to returning to it's fullest=stall.

[Thar]

2 - 1, Card B

 

Thanks for voting.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Both are somewhat like Fiendish Chain in respect to their first effects of blocking attacks, but card A gets vote.

 

I chose card A based on originality (like card B, it functions similarly to aforementioned Fiend/Demon Chain; but in exchange for only being to block attacks on the Summoning turn, the stat drop will prove to be effective in most cases.)

 

Card B is pretty much like Chain (except it's an Equip Trap for SS monsters), so nothing much to say in that respect.

[Thar]

2 - 2

 

Wow, close game.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I'm interested to see how this turns out. Either way, the feedback is pretty helpful.

[Darj]

I vote for A.

 

The main reason is, as Ein and Sakura already explained, Card B is essentially a weaker Fiendish Chain.

On the other hand, card A has an useful combination of attack negation + ATK drop, great for stopping and weakening monsters who otherwise would be a huge threat.

[Mugendramon]

Since the contest is already decided I'll just say this: It's sad how Card A looks like it was just edited slightly to fit the new requirement rather than the old one- since the Xyz theme usually goes hand to hand with galaxies and stuff, and the card clearly implies attacking those.