Jump to content

lock


MibeR

Recommended Posts

[center]All rules apply
First to 4 votes win or most at 1 week after cards being posted win
First to post become my enemy and they must willing to give each voters 3 points (i'll be give 3 points to)
6 points to all voters
Make Level 4 or lower monster

[b]-Mine-[/b]
[img]http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/9932/203203p.jpg[/img]
[i]When this card is Normal Summoned and your Life Points are higher than your opponent, you can Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower LIGHT monster whose ATK is equal to or less than the differences from your hand. Your opponent then Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower monster from their hand if possible. You can Tribute 1 Level 5 or higher monster you control to take control 1 Special Summoned monster your opponent control until your next End Phase.[/i]

[b]-Sheld's-[/b]
[img]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/4972/235906dw.jpg[/img]
[i]This card is also treated as a Plant-Type monster while it is on the field. When this is Normal Summoned, if you control another Plant-type monster, you can Draw 1 card.[/i]

If you notice : in the card it is 2nd End Phase, but i change it in the lore. Please use the lore. i change it before the contest started. just too lazy to generate it while i already post it



[/center]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDIT:
[img]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/4972/235906dw.jpg[/img]
This card is also treated as a Plant-Type monster while it is on the field. When this is Normal Summoned, if you control another Plant-type monster, you can Draw 1 card.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this 1-on-1 very disappointing and I will explain why:

Shields, the idea of an 1-on-1 is to pit your wits against another card maker in order to trump them by the level of your card making abilities, it is therefore manifest that you should post your most creative/polished/balanced/unique cards to try and outmatch your opponent. Looking at you card with its blurred image and boring effect and any card with a nice image and a half-coherent effect will automatically trump yours.

It is therefore an easy win for Maha Guns' "Modern Horseman" in my eyes as it has a unique and creative effect.

Shields, next time you enter a 1-on-1 you need to post a card that you believe will blow your opponent's out of the water. I don't mean to sound harsh or overly critical however I do feel it a shame that a card as creative as Maha Guns' was pitted against your card.

Maha Guns GMV put more effort in next time Shields.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='TheBigCheese' timestamp='1308225897' post='5287177']
I found this 1-on-1 very disappointing and I will explain why:

Shields, the idea of an 1-on-1 is to pit your wits against another card maker in order to trump them by the level of your card making abilities, it is therefore manifest that you should post your most creative/polished/balanced/unique cards to try and outmatch your opponent. Looking at you card with its blurred image and boring effect and any card with a nice image and a half-coherent effect will automatically trump yours.

It is therefore an easy win for Maha Guns' "Modern Horseman" in my eyes as it has a unique and creative effect.

Shields, next time you enter a 1-on-1 you need to post a card that you believe will blow your opponent's out of the water. I don't mean to sound harsh or overly critical however I do feel it a shame that a card as creative as Maha Guns' was pitted against your card.

Maha Guns GMV put more effort in next time Shields.
[/quote]
No...cards are NOT based on creative effects. Tell me, does [URL=http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_Armed_Dragon]this[/URL] have an effect that's flashy enough to blow your opponent out of the water? No, yet it is considered by many to be one of the most powerful cards in the game.

The way of creating a good, realistic card is to make it so that it would have a simple effect (enough to not confuse your opponent), and make it usable. Here is the problem with people in RC - everything's about creativity, and nobody bothers to look at the true uses of those cards with simple effects.

Therefore, with that being said, my vote goes to shelds. Sorry, Maha - it's not that I think your card is bad, but it wouldn't flow well in real life, seeing as there aren't many LIGHT, Warrior-Type monsters - yes, I know that you only put "1 LIGHT monster", which does not limit it to warriors, but the fact that the card itself is a Warrior makes the usability go down. The more prominent LIGHT decks include Lightsworns, Fableds, and Fairies, and the card doesn't fit into any of them properly. On the other hand, shelds made a nice, basic Level 3 monster (wouldve been better as a Tuner, though :P) with a simple yet useful effect that allows a free draw in Plant Decks - the card itself is treated as a Plant as well, so it doesn't break the flow of the deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'd hate to say this 1-on-1 was disappointing... so I'll shout it through cupped hands, "This 1-on-1 was disappointing!"

But in all seriousness though, I have to give my vote to shelds. Most of the reasons have already been said by Zextra (damn you). Though the picture quality and the OCG may not be perfect, his effect is simple and ready to use, and it's also a tuner which is great. Though it's true that Modern Horseman has a more creative effect, creativeness doesn't mean usefulness as I can't see Modern Horseman being used often, if not at all. And on Modern Horseman, that last effect was just unnecessary. It's just something extra that was just thrown on the card and doesn't really flow with the first two effects. Overall, sheld's card can be used much more effectively and easily than Maha's card and I think that is the winning factor for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes 3-2 for me,

Haha, you guys didn't know that aiming for Parsath while i create this card. The reason why i didn't make it Fairy, because it looks like a Warrior for me.

Thanks for the vote though, points will be given ASAP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='TheBigCheese' timestamp='1308225897' post='5287177']
I found this 1-on-1 very disappointing and I will explain why:

Shields, the idea of an 1-on-1 is to pit your wits against another card maker in order to trump them by the level of your card making abilities, it is therefore manifest that you should post your most creative/polished/balanced/unique cards to try and outmatch your opponent. Looking at you card with its blurred image and boring effect and any card with a nice image and a half-coherent effect will automatically trump yours.

It is therefore an easy win for Maha Guns' "Modern Horseman" in my eyes as it has a unique and creative effect.

Shields, next time you enter a 1-on-1 you need to post a card that you believe will blow your opponent's out of the water. I don't mean to sound harsh or overly critical however I do feel it a shame that a card as creative as Maha Guns' was pitted against your card.

Maha Guns GMV put more effort in next time Shields.
[/quote]

I totaly agree with him :)

[quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1308245479' post='5287774']
No...cards are NOT based on creative effects. Tell me, does [URL=http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_Armed_Dragon]this[/URL] have an effect that's flashy enough to blow your opponent out of the water? No, yet it is considered by many to be one of the most powerful cards in the game.

The way of creating a good, realistic card is to make it so that it would have a simple effect (enough to not confuse your opponent), and make it usable. Here is the problem with people in RC - everything's about creativity, and nobody bothers to look at the true uses of those cards with simple effects.

Therefore, with that being said, my vote goes to shelds. Sorry, Maha - it's not that I think your card is bad, but it wouldn't flow well in real life, seeing as there aren't many LIGHT, Warrior-Type monsters - yes, I know that you only put "1 LIGHT monster", which does not limit it to warriors, but the fact that the card itself is a Warrior makes the usability go down. The more prominent LIGHT decks include Lightsworns, Fableds, and Fairies, and the card doesn't fit into any of them properly. On the other hand, shelds made a nice, basic Level 3 monster (wouldve been better as a Tuner, though :P) with a simple yet useful effect that allows a free draw in Plant Decks - the card itself is treated as a Plant as well, so it doesn't break the flow of the deck.
[/quote]

Here we have Different POV's . SETS are to make a good flow Deck and well structured which DOES includes simple monsters even if they aren't the focus of the Set.
ANYWAY, CONTESTS are to show how good and creative you are. SO unless you are rating a entire Deck in a 1 on 1; the focus is the YCM'er abilities ;)
Anyway, it doesn't matter how important simple cards are, they become just a support for High ATK monsters or better Effect Monsters :(
JMO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...