My First Realistic Dragon!

[ProximaCentauri]

[img]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/7025/426178o.jpg[/img]

[Lyfe.]

I would raise the level to 7. Other than that, good job.

[Time Psyduck]

Firstly, Pyro-Dragon isn't a type. If you want to make a card of that type, it's fine, but if you want a realistic card you should use a real type. Either Pyro or Dragon will do, and if you don't specifically want to make a normal monster you could give it an effect that says: "This card is also treat as a [Whichever type you didn't make it]-Type monster."

Why 'Red-Eye'? Do you specifically want it to work with the Red-Eyes cards? If so, it should be "Red-Eye[b]s[/b] Pyro Dragon", and the text should provide at least some hints as to how it's related to the rest of the Red-Eyes series. If not, then why not just call it "Pyro Dragon" instead?

It's stats are fine for it's level, although it should probably have a slightly lower DEF (perhaps around 1500) - the normal monsters of any given level with the highest ATK values often have lower defences, and at level 6 the only other monsters with 2500+ ATK have 1200 and 1700 DEF.

There's a mark in the bottom corner of the image, which looks like a website's mark on the image to show it's theirs. You should crop the image to get rid of this if possible - if you want to acknowledge your image source, do so in the post below the card, rather than on it.

The text seems off somehow, although I'm not sure how. I think it might be the fact that it sounds like it's telling us volcanoes have the monster in them, rather that telling us where the monster is. Perhaps something like: "This mighty dragon lives deep in the heart of an active volcano" might work better.

[ragnarok1945]

change it to Pyro-type

it's boring for being a vanilla, though it's good to see it's FIRE, since that attribute it somewhat unpopular

if you give it some spell/trap support I'm sure it'll be fine