A post in Written Cards (Free from the metaphorical shackles)

[Mehmani]

Following my disagreement with Seattle's biggest idiot (outside of the characters from an infuriatingly twee children's show), I got kicked out of Leo's Created Card Game (which according to most other members of CCGs is a bad). Naturally, this means I have more time on my hands. It also means that my decent balance radar is no longer affected by the hypocrisy and general lack of TCG knowledge of certain others. So I'm free. It's kind of a good thing, for both me and the Orwellian government of that place.

 

|We Shall Overcome|0|JVST|Trap Card|Continuous|||When your opponent activates a card(s) that negates the effect(s) of card(s) you control, you can negate the activation of a card your opponent controls and destroy it. You cannot control Spell or Trap Card(s) other than "We Shall Overcome".|

[.Leo]

High Monster Beat says high?

 

Interesting card.

[Mehmani]

High Monster Beat says high?

 

Interesting card.

 

Yeah, I intended it to be a sort of Royal Oppression for Spells and Traps, though it's more like a longer-lasting Cold Wave that has a couple of restrictions. It would be useful to kill off resistance when about to OTK (it stops Effect Veiler, for example) or in an Anti-Meta build when you are gradually pushing for game. It can also stack like Decree does, which is useful for getting by MST, though that could change if MST goes to 3.

[.Leo]

True, I can see where you are getting at with MST. I honestly thought it would originally go back to 3.

 

It does help OTK and for set ups, prevent the obvious Effect Veiler and ect.

[Mehmani]

True, I can see where you are getting at with MST. I honestly thought it would originally go back to 3.

 

It does help OTK and for set ups, prevent the obvious Effect Veiler and ect.

 

I'm still worried this is too restrictive as it only stops effect negation. Maybe destruction as well, or perhaps just bouncing? Bouncing is more commonplace in Spells and Traps than plain old destruction, plus it would protect Synchros from the omnipresent Compulsory Ejaculation Evacuation Device.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Stop with the complaining Alfred. The reasoning behind whatever it was, was not anything to do with your failure in reasonings at all. Hell even in the note to have you leave, Leo still had the respect to praise that. You were kicked out due to your hostile and what they viewed as stubborn mannerisms.

[Mehmani]

Stop with the complaining Alfred. The reasoning behind whatever it was, was not anything to do with your failure in reasonings at all. Hell even in the note to have you leave, Leo still had the respect to praise that. You were kicked out due to your hostile and what they viewed as stubborn mannerisms.

 

As a moderator, you are free to say what you want when you want. I cannot risk arguing against you because I know at some point you would just stop being bothered and ban me. So why do you choose to be fair (at least, to an extent)? You could goof (ytime) around and do what you wanted, ban people for disagreeing with you, etc. but you don't. Why?

[Guest JoshIcy]

As a moderator, you are free to say what you want when you want. I cannot risk arguing against you because I know at some point you would just stop being bothered and ban me. So why do you choose to be fair (at least, to an extent)? You could goof (ytime) around and do what you wanted, ban people for disagreeing with you, etc. but you don't. Why?

 

Because I am not like that. Maybe it's cultural beliefs? Maybe it's promises to friends? It could be a lot. So feel free to argue against me, as long as you don't break any rules I won't have to step above a personal stance.