Lexadin Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 [center]Yeah, I must admit I like Witches better then Witch Hunters, but I couldn't resist making a card based on "The Hammer of Witches", the book that killed millions of inocent woman during the witch trials. And imo the imgs are that good, but whatever. So here are the cards. [img]http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/3066/20638e.jpg[/img] [i]Equip only to a Warrior-Type monster you control. After activation, destroy all face-up Fiend and Spellcaster-Type monsters on the field and put 1 Witch-Hunter Counter on this card for each card destroyed by this effect. When a Fiend or Spellcaster-Type monster is destroyed, put 1 Witch-Hunter Counter on this card. When there are 10 or more Witch-Hunter Counters on this card, you can tribute the equipped monster and Special Summon 1 "Legendary Witch Hunter" from your hand or Deck and equip this card to it. While equipped to "Legendary Witch Hunter" all monsters your opponent controle are treated as Spellcaster-Type Effect Monsters.[/i] [size="1"]Pic by DArtist eawyne[/size] [img]http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/9656/20638z.jpg[/img] [i]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by the effect of "Malleus Maleficarum". This card is unaffected by the effects of Spell Cards. Negate the activation and effect(s) of Fiend and Spellcaster-Type Effect Monsters. When this card destroys a Fiend or Spellcaster-Type monster by battle, you can draw 1 card.[/i] [size="1"]Pic from DArtist VJ Helm[/size] [/center] [size="1"][color="#2F4F4F"]Rate/Hate/Fix/Comment[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well...the Equip Spell is certainly anti-meta in the extreme. Maybe make it Spellcasters in general, since you're hunting witches (and wizards)? If you do, you'll want to reduce the number of Witch-Hunter Counters needed for the trigger. Also, why do you need to equip it to the summoned monster, given that it's served its purpose? As for the "Legendary Witch Hunter", the lack of need for the Equip Spell is extended, since it isn't affected by Spells. I do like the blanket negation, but again, since the last effect only triggers when a Spellcaster-Type is destroyed, perhaps you should only make it immune to Spellcaster-Type monster effects. There are also some OCG errors, if you want me to fix them. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well I thought about making them Anti-Spellcasters only, but then I would UP them too much imo. And because, unlike the name suggests, Witch Hunters actually also (tried) to kill supernatural creatures, but because this basicly includes all YGO monsters, I only chose DARK monsters and LIGHT (as I presume they used to confuse them a lot). The reason why I made it a Equip Spell instead of a Continuous one like I first wanted it to be, is 2-sided, firstly so it can enjoy the support of the Many Equip Support cards out there and secondly so that the equipped monster would have the book with it, because, as the title says, it's basicly the Witch Hunter's Bible. The Tribute represends the transformation of the Warrior into the Witch Hunter. Yes, I would like the fix plz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 [quote name='Lexadin' timestamp='1293036028' post='4873805'] Well I thought about making them Anti-Spellcasters only, but then I would UP them too much imo. And because, unlike the name suggests, Witch Hunters actually also (tried) to kill supernatural creatures, but because this basicly includes all YGO monsters, I only chose DARK monsters and LIGHT (as I presume they used to confuse them a lot). [/quote] If they tried to deal with the supernatural, then why not Spellcasters and Fiends? That covers a large number of commonly-used monsters and Archetypes. Also, a large number of YGO monsters would be seen as 'divine' or 'elemental', which back then were seen as good and/or natural. If it is made purely anti-Fiend and Spellcaster, you might want to give it some more potent effects. [quote name='Lexadin' timestamp='1293036028' post='4873805'] The reason why I made it a Equip Spell instead of a Continuous one like I first wanted it to be, is 2-sided, firstly so it can enjoy the support of the Many Equip Support cards out there and secondly so that the equipped monster would have the book with it, because, as the title says, it's basicly the Witch Hunter's Bible. [/quote] Then it should probably gain an effect while equipped to "Legendary Witch-Hunter". Otherwise it's a lost Spell/Trap Zone. [quote name='Lexadin' timestamp='1293036028' post='4873805'] Yes, I would like the fix plz. [/quote] [b]Malleus Maleficarum:[/b] Equip only to a Warrior-Type monster you control. After activation, destroy all face-up Fiend and Spellcaster-Type monsters on the field and put 1 Witch-Hunter Counter on this card for each card destroyed by this effect. When a Fiend or Spellcaster-Type monster is destroyed, put 1 Witch-Hunter Counter on this card. When there are 10 or more Witch-Hunter Counters on this card, you can tribute the equipped monster and Special Summon 1 "Legendary Witch Hunter" from your hand or Deck and equip this card to it. While equipped to "Legendary Witch Hunter"... [b]Legendary Witch Hunter:[/b] This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by the effect of "Malleus Maleficarum". This card is unaffected by the effects of Spell Cards. Negate the activation and effect(s) of Fiend and Spellcaster-Type Effect Monsters. When this card destroys a Fiend or Spellcaster-Type monster by battle, you can draw 1 card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Mhh, Max. You actually gave me a brilliant idea. I'll follow your advice and change it to Fiends and Spellcasters, and with a new effect to Malleus, it will still be a killer combo. And thanks for the fixes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut - Envoy of the End Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Personally I don't like the 'DNA Surgery' style effect at the end of the equip card, especially as highlighted the monster is immune to Spells. Generic counters are generic. Other than that good cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Yeah, didn't really expected it to be my best work, but I just had to make it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Bumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2010 Happy x-Mas Bumb! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2010 Bumb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Final Bumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endphase Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Yeah, it's overpowered. You're right. But less overpowered than other cards I saw today, so I give you a 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 How is it OP? It needs 10 specific monster to be destroyed to fullfil its Summoning requirements. Without DNA Surgery or a huge amount of luck that's almost impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endphase Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 If you play a Spellcaster deck (like me ) that card is a nightmare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Yes, but overal it's pretty situational. It's OP when you're lucky as I said before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endphase Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Yeah, that's right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Glad you're seeing this way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.