El Majishan Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Monster 20 Yubel - The Ultimate Nightmare x1 Yubel- Terror Incarnate x2 Yubel- x2 Doom Shaman x2 Scared Phoenix of Nephthys x2 Dark Grepher x2 Armageddon Knight x3 Mystic Tomato x3 Sangan x1 Hand of Nephthys x2 Spells 13 Card Destruction x1 Dark World Dealings x2 (i dont have allurs) Monster Reborn x1 Heavy Storm x1 Mystical Space Typhoon x1 Fires of Dooms Day x3 Foolish Burial x2 Swing of Memories x2 Traps 7 Torrential Tribute x1 Dark Illusion x2 Limit Reverse x3 All-Out Attacks x1 I was thinking about fitting in a Magical Mallet in there in case i get a hand full of high level monsters but I'm not sure....anyway rate and fix if you can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 and now to wait for arkel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 and now to wait for arkel... Seconded Another Hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 and now to wait for arkel... Seconded Another Hand? i want to keep it at 40, so wat should i take out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 i want to keep it at 40' date=' so wat should i take out? [/quote']yubel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 yubel. 3 yubels seems like overkill to me..but i'll try it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 erm, maybe i should have quoted. /edits previous post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 erm' date=' maybe i should have quoted. /edits previous post[/quote'] a yubel deck with 1 yubel is pointless, sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorch848 Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Yay i agree tke out the two yubels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Yay i agree tke out the two yubels and how does dat make u feel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 ...your STILL not getting it.i was implying that yubel is a bad card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 ...your STILL not getting it.i was implying that yubel is a bad card. i know, but i jus choose to look past dat cuz its a YUBEL deck....get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 ...well, let me rephrase it entirely:my constructive criticism is that you shouldnt run a yubel deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 ...well' date=' let me rephrase it entirely:my constructive criticism is that you shouldnt run a yubel deck.[/quote'] i know wat u are tryin to say, but its a fun deck to run and i wanted to do something different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 ...well' date=' let me rephrase it entirely:my constructive criticism is that you shouldnt run a yubel deck.[/quote'] The quoted post reeks of failure. On-topic: I don't have time to build a Sacred Yubel build that actually works right now, but Abyssal Kingshark is a must in here. I'll post my build when it's done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 ...well' date=' let me rephrase it entirely:my constructive criticism is that you shouldnt run a yubel deck.[/quote'] The quoted post reeks of failure. On-topic: I don't have time to build a Sacred Yubel build that actually works right now, but Abyssal Kingshark is a must in here. I'll post my build when it's done. i ran the deck today, foolish burial kept comin up as a dead draw cuz knight and grepher already did all the dumping, so im thinkin about puttin magical mallet (to put the high levels back into my deck) and rota in to replace them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 You do that then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 You do that then. yup as soon as i get 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 HahHahHah.You do that then. DAMN IT!I WAS GONNA SAY THAT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 HahHahHah.You do that then. DAMN IT!I WAS GONNA SAY THAT! got anything useful to add? or u jus gonna take up space? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 2 swings for 2 targets = bad -2 swings+2 Trade Ins-2 Dark Worlds+2 Card Destruction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 2 swings for 2 targets = bad -2 swings+2 Trade Ins-2 Dark Worlds+2 Card Destruction LOLWUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 2 swings for 2 targets = bad -2 swings+2 Trade Ins-2 Dark Worlds+2 Card Destruction 1.swings comes in handy for a quick yubel 2.going by your logic 2 trade ins for two targets is bad. 3.last time i checked Card Destruction was at one, so im guessin u ment Hand Destruction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 2 swings for 2 targets = bad -2 swings+2 Trade Ins-2 Dark Worlds+2 Card Destruction 1.swings comes in handy for a quick yubel 2.going by your logic 2 trade ins for 4 targets is bad. 3.last time i checked Card Destruction was at one' date=' so im guessin u ment Hand Destruction?[/quote'] Yes, hand destructions was what I meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 2 swings for 2 targets = bad -2 swings+2 Trade Ins-2 Dark Worlds+2 Card Destruction 1.swings comes in handy for a quick yubel 2.going by your logic 2 trade ins for 4 targets is bad. 3.last time i checked Card Destruction was at one' date=' so im guessin u ment Hand Destruction?[/quote'] Yes, hand destructions was what I meant. i looked through my deck and only counted 2 lv8's...mind pointin out the other two for me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.