Flexh Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 WWE or TNA which is better discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Hmm... WWE is a Global Company, and has a lot of top-name Superstars as well as great HD cameras and audio, but it's PG. However TNA is more unique, has a lot of high-profile Superstars, and isn't for kids, but it's not a Global Company and the audio isn't very good... I'd have to say WWE overall. =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 TNA has potential but it's still small =\ I for one would love a merge =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 TNA has potential but it's still small =\ I for one would love a merge =D That would be cool, but there would be some major disagreements like on the ring and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexh Posted February 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 there would be a lot of problems but the superstars would be good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 TNA has potential but it's still small =\ I for one would love a merge =D That would be cool' date=' but there would be some major disagreements like on the ring and stuff.[/quote'] TNA could have their own ring and a 6-sided ECW has sex all over it. Also can you imagine a Sting VS Undertaker match and the amount of ass it would kick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 TNA has potential but it's still small =\ I for one would love a merge =D That would be cool' date=' but there would be some major disagreements like on the ring and stuff.[/quote'] TNA could have their own ring and a 6-sided ECW has sex all over it. Also can you imagine a Sting VS Undertaker match and the amount of ass it would kick? Jeff Jarret vs Vince McMahon rivalry is epic win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarbleZone Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I lost interest in WWE's storylines, which was the best thing they had going for them lately. In terms of sheer wrestling, TNA hands down. It has a huge amount of talent, both in the heavyweight and the X division. The storylines range anywhere from nice to ridiculous, but that doesn't really matter once you get Angle, Styles, Shelley and crew to do their stuff. WWE has big personas. Nobody in TNA has the same aura as alumni like The Undertaker, Shawn Michaels or Triple H - it has some old glories, like the Dudleys, Steiner and Nash, but it doesn't have legendary names; WWE has an edge on that respect, but only because they are characters that have been around for decades. TNA started what, six/seven years ago?The amount of sheer talent in that roster gives TNA a legitimate edge over the colossus that is WWE, and that's worth a lot of praise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexh Posted February 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Yeh but a lot of the best legends in TNA came from the WWE like Jeff Hardy and Christian who have came back to wwe but then sgain mst wwe superstars were from WCW but altoghther WWE have better talent storylines and matches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 WWF. WWE is not too good these days.I really can't decide, probably WWE because of the old days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.