Mister Sir Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Why was Twin-Headed Behemoth Limited in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I believe it was a technicality ruling. Multiples in the graveyard would lead to a problem for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Because It comes back after its destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted February 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Because It comes back after its destroyed. So does Treeborn Frog, but they didn't bring that one back to being Unlimited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I believe it was a technicality ruling. Multiples in the graveyard would lead to a problem for some reason. I run 2 Twin-Headed Behemoth. I draw the first one, Summon it, have it destroyed, use its effect, and then it gets returned to my deck by Ehren or Pot of Avarice or something. Later in the duel, I draw Twin-Headed Behemoth. It is impossible to know whether or not I had previously used the effect of the card I just drew. If Konami can make a decent ruling to solve this problem, then THB to 3 is a perfectly sensible move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I think Konami is just going to make it that it can only use its effect Once per duel, which applies to the other Twin-Headed Behemoths in the Deck aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I think Konami is just going to make it that it can only use its effect Once per duel' date=' which applies to the other Twin-Headed Behemoths in the Deck aswell[/quote'] This is the OCG ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I think Konami is just going to make it that it can only use its effect Once per duel' date=' which applies to the other Twin-Headed Behemoths in the Deck aswell[/quote'] This is the OCG ruling. If that's the case, then I'm sure the TCG ruling will follow. It always seems to. I'm thinking it was once limited because that ruling wasn't always in place and multiple Behemoths could cause problems like in Crab's situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 The new ruling doesn't make sense. The effect isn't "Special Summon 1 "Twin-Headed Behemoth" from your Graveyard", it is "Special Summon this card from the Graveyard". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 The new ruling doesn't make sense. The effect isn't "Special Summon 1 "Twin-Headed Behemoth" from your Graveyard"' date=' it is "Special Summon this card from the Graveyard".[/quote'] Erratas exist for a reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 The new ruling doesn't make sense. The effect isn't "Special Summon 1 "Twin-Headed Behemoth" from your Graveyard"' date=' it is "Special Summon this card from the Graveyard".[/quote'] Erratas exist for a reason My point exactly. New errata, not ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 as crab said, but then again, this rulling could also have applied to plagurspreader zombie, it gets returned to the deck, and destroyed, if you have more then 1, you never know if it's the 1 that gets RFPd or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Its because of Konami's oh-so creative way of wording its effect."You can only use this effect once during the current duel" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 as crab said' date=' but then again, this rulling could also have applied to plagurspreader zombie, it gets returned to the deck, and destroyed, if you have more then 1, you never know if it's the 1 that gets RFPd or not.[/quote'] Plaguespreader does not work that way. At all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 I believe it was a technicality ruling. Multiples in the graveyard would lead to a problem for some reason. I run 2 Twin-Headed Behemoth. I draw the first one' date=' Summon it, have it destroyed, use its effect, and then it gets returned to my deck by Ehren or Pot of Avarice or something. Later in the duel, I draw Twin-Headed Behemoth. It is impossible to know whether or not I had previously used the effect of the card I just drew. If Konami can make a decent ruling to solve this problem, then THB to 3 is a perfectly sensible move.[/quote'] well, we use card sleeves here, so we could slip something in, like a scrap of paper saying used or something like that. course, online, that isn't so easily done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 I believe it was a technicality ruling. Multiples in the graveyard would lead to a problem for some reason. I run 2 Twin-Headed Behemoth. I draw the first one' date=' Summon it, have it destroyed, use its effect, and then it gets returned to my deck by Ehren or Pot of Avarice or something. Later in the duel, I draw Twin-Headed Behemoth. It is impossible to know whether or not I had previously used the effect of the card I just drew. If Konami can make a decent ruling to solve this problem, then THB to 3 is a perfectly sensible move.[/quote'] well, we use card sleeves here, so we could slip something in, like a scrap of paper saying used or something like that. course, online, that isn't so easily done. If you use players choice or Ultra pro sleeves like I do, than you would be able to see through it. It would be considered Marked, punishable by 2 years ban. But since UDE is out of commission... Im for it at the current time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBooth Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Whats going on with UDE anyway? Is it bust completely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 It got limited because of Some stupid ruling... They need to revise it so it can be at three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I believe it was a technicality ruling. Multiples in the graveyard would lead to a problem for some reason. I run 2 Twin-Headed Behemoth. I draw the first one' date=' Summon it, have it destroyed, use its effect, and then it gets returned to my deck by Ehren or Pot of Avarice or something. Later in the duel, I draw Twin-Headed Behemoth. It is impossible to know whether or not I had previously used the effect of the card I just drew. If Konami can make a decent ruling to solve this problem, then THB to 3 is a perfectly sensible move.[/quote'] well, we use card sleeves here, so we could slip something in, like a scrap of paper saying used or something like that. course, online, that isn't so easily done. If you use players choice or Ultra pro sleeves like I do, than you would be able to see through it. It would be considered Marked, punishable by 2 years ban. You could put it on the front of the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 It got limited because of Some stupid ruling... They need to revise it so it can be at three http://manjyomethunder.twoday.net/stories/5526235/ New Rulings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.