Jump to content

Graverobber's been Robbed?!


Recommended Posts

Some of its matchups are just plain awful. Against Lightlords builds that don't include CCV, for example, it's a more expensive Threatening Roar at best, and even if they do run CCV, it's only any use at all if the CCV has already been milled. In fact, if your opponent doesn't have CCV or Dustshoot in the graveyard, this is weak in general: it can become a PWWB with a more restrictive cost, a CED with a cost, a Threatening with a cost, a Waboku with a cost, and so on, but it's always just a weaker version of another card that you could be running instead. You could say it's more versatile, but considering that it depends entirely on what the opponent has in the graveyard, I would consider "inconsistent" to be a more apt description. Throw in the fact that it's useless early in the game, and it has some serious problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of its matchups are just plain awful. Against Lightlords builds that don't include CCV' date=' for example, it's a more expensive Threatening Roar at best, and even if they do run CCV, it's only any use at all if the CCV has already been milled. In fact, if your opponent doesn't have CCV or Dustshoot in the graveyard, this is weak in general: it can become a PWWB with a more restrictive cost, a CED with a cost, a Threatening with a cost, a Waboku with a cost, and so on, but it's always just a weaker version of another card that you could be running instead. You could say it's more versatile, but considering that it depends entirely on what the opponent has in the graveyard, I would consider "inconsistent" to be a more apt description. Throw in the fact that it's useless early in the game, and it has some serious problems.

[/quote']

 

^this^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of its matchups are just plain awful. Against Lightlords builds that don't include CCV' date=' for example, it's a more expensive Threatening Roar at best, and even if they do run CCV, it's only any use at all if the CCV has already been milled. In fact, if your opponent doesn't have CCV or Dustshoot in the graveyard, this is weak in general: it can become a PWWB with a more restrictive cost, a CED with a cost, a Threatening with a cost, a Waboku with a cost, and so on, but it's always just a weaker version of another card that you could be running instead. You could say it's more versatile, but considering that it depends entirely on what the opponent has in the graveyard, I would consider "inconsistent" to be a more apt description. Throw in the fact that it's useless early in the game, and it has some serious problems.

[/quote']

 

Yes, because running one of every trap card in a pro move and so much better than this card.

 

Imagine copying Miorror, effectively giving you two!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of its matchups are just plain awful. Against Lightlords builds that don't include CCV' date=' for example, it's a more expensive Threatening Roar at best, and even if they do run CCV, it's only any use at all if the CCV has already been milled. In fact, if your opponent doesn't have CCV or Dustshoot in the graveyard, this is weak in general: it can become a PWWB with a more restrictive cost, a CED with a cost, a Threatening with a cost, a Waboku with a cost, and so on, but it's always just a weaker version of another card that you could be running instead. [b']You could say it's more versatile, but considering that it depends entirely on what the opponent has in the graveyard, I would consider "inconsistent" to be a more apt description.[/b] Throw in the fact that it's useless early in the game, and it has some serious problems.

 

Yes, because running one of every trap card in a pro move and so much better than this card.

 

Not one of each; just one of one. In anticipation of your next response, see the bolded section.

 

Imagine copying Miorror' date=' effectively giving you two!

[/quote']

 

I'm assuming that "Miorror" means "Mirror Force", although it could mean "Bubble Crash" for all I know.

 

First of all, very few people run Mirror Force in this format, and unless your opponent not only runs Mirror Force but also has drawn and used it already, this card cannot have a Mirror Force effect. Second of all, even ignoring all of that, all you're getting is a highly situational and inconsistent Trap version of Lightning Vortex with a more restrictive discard cost that can only be used late in the game and that can't take down a face-up Defense Position monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I take it this works like Trap of Drakness?

 

Exactly.

 

not exactly... this pulls from your opponents grave... but close enough i suppose...

Read the bold, Im sure FD was referring to the "Skipping of the Cost/activation requirements" not the fact that its two different cards. I mean, I think its an entirely different card, but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well' date=' y'know, Blackwings can already utilize Crush Card Virus if you put it in your deck instead of relying on opponents.

[/quote']Pic of 1000 ATK or less Blackwing or it didn't happen.

 

Anyway, this card is woth side-decking, but it should not go in the main deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well' date=' y'know, Blackwings can already utilize Crush Card Virus if you put it in your deck instead of relying on opponents.

[/quote']Pic of 1000 ATK or less Blackwing or it didn't happen.

 

Anyway, this card is woth side-decking, but it should not go in the main deck.

 

Huh, I was sure at least the Tuner guy had 1,000 or less.

 

Oh well, I'd still never maindeck this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of its matchups are just plain awful. Against Lightlords builds that don't include CCV' date=' for example, it's a more expensive Threatening Roar at best, and even if they do run CCV, it's only any use at all if the CCV has already been milled. In fact, if your opponent doesn't have CCV or Dustshoot in the graveyard, this is weak in general: it can become a PWWB with a more restrictive cost, a CED with a cost, a Threatening with a cost, a Waboku with a cost, and so on, but it's always just a weaker version of another card that you could be running instead. You could say it's more versatile, but considering that it depends entirely on what the opponent has in the graveyard, I would consider "inconsistent" to be a more apt description. Throw in the fact that it's useless early in the game, and it has some serious problems.

[/quote']

 

This is very true, although it does have one other non-very useful thing to use as, a bluff, although its a horrible way to use it. This card will be seen played a little if all when it comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...