Azuh Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Prove me wrong Go, go, go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 On the contrary, sire. Banlists need to be changed once during the game's life. Prove me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frlf Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Prove me wrong Go' date=' go, go![/quote'] Sure, because they always bring smart banlists. Also, it'd be like this: 1st - Card A is Limited!2nd - Card A is Banned!3rd - Card A is Semi Limited! Making a huge confluzzion. Just not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 On the contrary' date=' sire. Banlists need to be changed once during the game's life. Prove me wrong.[/quote'] Easy. New cards are always being made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orphaned_godzilla Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 On the contrary' date=' sire. Banlists need to be changed once during the game's life. Prove me wrong.[/quote'] Easy. New cards are always being made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 On the contrary' date=' sire. Banlists need to be changed once during the game's life. Prove me wrong.[/quote'] Easy. New cards are always being made. Of course, factor in the fact that humankind = manunkind, and yes; you're right, I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should change the banlists every Wednesday, just to cut down on netdecking and keep everyone on their toes. And also because it would be hilarious. ...or they could just make one decent banlist and only update it when new sets make an update necessary, but that would require them to know how to make a decent banlist, so we'd be better off with the once-a-week option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should change the banlists every Wednesday' date=' just to cut down on netdecking and keep everyone on their toes. And also because it would be hilarious.[/quote'] +1 Approval. This will also make things very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Not only would it be hilarious. It will actually provide some fun to the game. Different deck-types will show up But every week maybe a bit annoying, i would say every two weeks would be beneficial >_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Not only would it be hilarious. It will actually provide some fun to the game. Different deck-types will show up But every week maybe a bit annoying' date=' i would say every two weeks would be beneficial >_<[/quote'] Yes, as if archetypes are the reason YGO is lolphail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should change the banlists every Wednesday' date=' just to cut down on netdecking and keep everyone on their toes. And also because it would be hilarious. [/quote'] didnt they hange the banlist once aweek in one of the yugioh gba games??? i think it was 05/06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 I agree to this topic. There should be a new banlist every March, June, September, and December. This would allow UDE and/or Konami more time to determine what cards to ban, assuming that they would actually ban the right cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Every 6 months is fine. March and September are good enough times for people to expirience certain deck strategies without constantly having to change up their cards. Every 3 months would be redundant. Not needed. Besides, Ban Lists only really change when enough people complain about not being able to face Gorz because their decks suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 knowing konami I wouldnt be supprised if they unbanned everything, then ran all of the cards into a randomiser, and banned the top 20 results, limited the next 20, and so on and so forth,each 2 months or somthing untill everything is banned seriously: I would like to see more list changes more often Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should change the banlists every Wednesday' date=' just to cut down on netdecking and keep everyone on their toes. And also because it would be hilarious.[/quote'] +1 Final Fusion Approved. This will also make things very interesting. And if they updated every week, Then Konami would eventually- Wait, Konami?They would just ban Dogma and unlimit Level Limit Area B. For some unknown reason that these cards are somehow contradict eachother, and at the same time prevent some Armed Dragon lvl10/Shining Flare Wingman/Catapult Turtle FTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Every 6 months is fine. March and September are good enough times for people to expirience certain deck strategies without constantly having to change up their cards. Every 3 months would be redundant. Not needed. Besides' date=' Ban Lists only really change when enough people complain about not being able to face Gorz because their decks suck.[/quote'] Yeah, we should unlimit everything. Anyone who can't beat Exchange FTK is just QQing because their deck sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MastaCow116 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 I assume they'll ban Shorti Circuit, because it's oh so meta, then move on to unbanning every dark monster in order to help DAD users when Christia drops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should change the banlists every Wednesday' date=' just to cut down on netdecking and keep everyone on their toes. And also because it would be hilarious.[/quote']Yes! On a serious matter however I think that they should just make a banlist every six months like they have been or just make 1 good one that doesnt have a deck that controls the meta and whatnot and just update it with every pack like Crab said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 They should update the list every time new packs are released imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 For good ban list it should only be changed so it can be updated with new sets. Since new sets come out on average every 3 months you would be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Every 6 months is fine. March and September are good enough times for people to expirience certain deck strategies without constantly having to change up their cards. Every 3 months would be redundant. Not needed. Besides' date=' Ban Lists only really change when enough people complain about not being able to face Gorz because their decks suck.[/quote']The fact about Gorz, Is that he has 2700ATK, which beats most of the strong cards out thare, And add to that, You get a free token which has an ATK/DEF of the battle damage you took. In this case, Its usually like 3100 So after that 1 single direct attack, You gave the opponet a 2700ATK beatstick, and a 3100ATK beatstick ontop of that. So how is that not ban-worthy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 You get a free token which has an ATK/DEF of the battle damage you took. In this case' date=' Its [b']usually like 3100[/b] So after that 1 single direct attack, You gave the opponet a 2700ATK beatstick, and a 3100ATK beatstick ontop of that. So how is that not ban-worthy? Usually like 3100? Because 3 quarters of all cards are Arcana Force XXI - The World right? Don't get me wrong though, Gorz is still totally banworthy, its just that 3100 is a high and extremely rare example, even after ATK modifiers. The only way I can see the Token getting over 2800 original ATK in competitive play is if you run into an Honest'd beatstick, a JD, or a Herak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 It should be everytime a new card is printed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 It should be everytime a new card is printed. Not if the card isn't listworthy. =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 It should be everytime a new card is printed. It should be everytime a new card is printed that would require a list update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.