Darklord Zerato

[Lemniscate]

Turns any dark monster into Raigeki. Bannable.

 

Levia Dragon - Daedalus turns Umi into an atom bomb. Neo Ocean Dragon Lord upgrades that Atom Bomb. They haven't been banned yet. Levia Dragon would f*** this.

 

Still......awsome art is awsome.

 

What's more splashable: Generic DARK Monster or A Legendary Ocean/Umi?

 

How is splashability even related to this?

 

Splashability is one factor to consider when determining a card's banworthiness.

 

We are discussing the ban-ability of Darklord Zerato.

 

Good' date=' you figured out what this topic is!

 

Also, Exchange of the Spirit is not splashable into every deck and still effective, so should it be un-banned?

 

Why do you idiots assume that something is always either THE ONE AND ONLY ULTIMATE DECIDING FACTOR AND ONLY IT MATTERS or completely and utterly irrelevant to the topic at hand? As difficult as it may be for your one-dimensional brains to understand, there is more than one factor to consider.

 

1) Yes, but he was acting as if it was the only factor

2) Yes

3) I was merely pointing out the holes in his arguement

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

 

3) I was merely pointing out the holes in his arguement

 

Tea's "argument" was with Omega's comment that Levia was more useful than Darklord, when they have very similar effects, but Levia requires Umi/ALO as a cost, and Darklord simply requires a DARK monster, which is significantly easier to draw into than Umi/ALO.

 

Levia shouldn't be banned before Darklord =/= "splashability is the only factor when considering the banworthiness of a card".

[Lemniscate]

 

3) I was merely pointing out the holes in his arguement

 

Tea's "argument" was with Omega's comment that Levia was more useful than Darklord' date=' when they have very similar effects, but Levia requires Umi/ALO as a cost, and Darklord simply requires a DARK monster, which is significantly easier to draw into than Umi/ALO.

 

Levia shouldn't be banned before Darklord =/= "splashability is the only factor when considering the banworthiness of a card".

[/quote']

 

did I ever say it was the only factor? to me that just seems like your assumptions.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

No, and that's completely unrelated to what I just said. You said Tea was "acting as if splashibility was the only factor in determining banworthiness", so I said that Tea was merely pointing out that Darklord was better than Levia, and Levia shouldn't be banned before it as Omega was implying.

[Lemniscate]

No' date=' and that's completely unrelated to what I just said. You said Tea was "acting as if splashibility was the only factor in determining banworthiness", so I said that Tea was merely pointing out that Darklord was better than Levia, and Levia shouldn't be banned before it as Omega was implying.

[/quote']

 

let's compare:

What you say I said, "Tea was acting as if splashibility was the only factor in determining banworthiness"

What I actually said, "How is splashability even related to this?"

So how can you attack me for something I never said.

I also never said to ban Levia before Zerato, and, if you notice, neither did Omega.

If you are going to make assumptions, then have something to back them up besides more assumptions.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

For what I said you said, here it is.

 

 

1) Yes' date=' but he was acting as if it was the only factor

 

[/quote']

 

 

Please keep track of what you say, or at the very least check your other posts. T_T

 

For what I said Omega said, here it is.

 

 

Levia Dragon - Daedalus turns Umi into an atom bomb. Neo Ocean Dragon Lord upgrades that Atom Bomb. They haven't been banned yet. Levia Dragon would f*** this.

 

This implies that Levia is more useful than Zerato, and as such Levia was more banworthy than it.

[「tea.leaf」]

I lol'd.

 

HarbingerEvil = New EHA/Old Roxas