Jump to content

Metal Gear Solid 4 or Call of Duty [World at War]?


RestLess-BoTics

Metal Gear Solid 4 or Call of Duty [World at War]?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Metal Gear Solid 4 or Call of Duty [World at War]?

    • Metal Gear Solid 4.
    • Call of Duty [World at War].
    • They're both horrible video games.


Recommended Posts

.... =O

 

ITT: Misguided people.

 

Besides, they aren't even comparable - they're different genres.

 

Still, if I only had money for one of them, Metal Gear Solid 4 hands down. One of the top 3 games for the PS3 (the console I own) out there as of now.

Besides, I don't think World at War is even the best of its genre right now. Resistance 2 > CoD4 > CoD WaW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruby. Cod WAW is the same on all consoles. There is no subway level that would ruin the game. The shack is supposed to be closed in so you can't get out. Unless you do what I do and glitch!

 

My desicion is COD WAW. And Blackwind so their different genres. The question was which one would you choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people need to wake up.

 

MGS 4 was on of the best games of last year. It got second in Gamefaqs 08 poll. WaW didn't even win Multi-Platform.

 

Also how are you compairing the 2? MGS4 is a single player game, WaW is Multi-player. Their two very different things and can't, and shouldn't, even be compaired. Also why is WaW so popular? All it is is a crappier version of 4.

 

Don't say because it's new or because my friends are playing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people need to wake up.

 

MGS 4 was on of the best games of last year. It got second in Gamefaqs 08 poll. WaW didn't even win Multi-Platform.

 

Also how are you compairing the 2? MGS4 is a single player game' date=' WaW is Multi-player. Their two very different things and can't, and shouldn't, even be compaired. Also why is WaW so popular? All it is is a crappier version of 4.

 

Don't say because it's new or because my friends are playing it.

[/quote']

 

it's not new, but at the very least WaW chose new maps and scenes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people need to wake up.

 

MGS 4 was on of the best games of last year. It got second in Gamefaqs 08 poll. WaW didn't even win Multi-Platform.

 

Also how are you compairing the 2? MGS4 is a single player game' date=' WaW is Multi-player. Their two very different things and can't, and shouldn't, even be compaired. Also why is WaW so popular? All it is is a crappier version of 4.

 

Don't say because it's new or because my friends are playing it.

[/quote']

 

it's not new, but at the very least WaW chose new maps and scenes

It's only 2 months old. It's new.

 

That is a decent reason, but that doesn't make it a better game right? What I don't get is that from what I've seen every one make WaW out to be a better game when it isn't.

 

hands down Call of Duty World at War love this game

You've never played MGS4 so how can you say?

 

O, that is a good point. How many people have only played one of them?

 

Unless you've played both or neither, but know a lot about both if so, you can't say since you won't give an objective view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say MGS 4. I loved the single player campaign, and have gone on to beat it multiple times. I'm not a big fan of the online, even though it is well put together. (Aside from the extra registration BS) I just find it too slow paced for my liking. Only reason I bought W@W was because 4 was so good. The single player is terrible in comparison. I couldn't like the characters, no matter how hard I tried to. By the end of CoD4, I was like D:. World at War's online is good, but it's still not as good as CoD 4's. I dislike the idea of tanks, the spawning system is terrible, and it's littered with glitches. There were no real upgrades from CoD4 and it just feels like a WW2 expansion for CoD4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...