~Shore Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 what do you think of the fake types in custom cards. I was neutral to them in the beginning, but now they're really starting to annoy me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I don't like them, but some sub-types are really good, that's different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I mostly agree with Envoy of Infinity. Sub-types can be okay, but whole new types can be a little ugh. They don't bother me too much though. Especially since I haven't looked at custom cards in forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuigiFan#1 Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 meh, i use em, but i don't let em bother me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 Sub-Types are only good if you have enough for a deck or strong ATK/DEF wise. As for fake types, I don't really care. I guess I am neutral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I use (Official Type) / (Fake Type) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 what do you think of the fake types in custom cards. I was neutral to them in the beginning' date=' but now they're really starting to annoy me[/quote'] i argee with you 150% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I like the new sub-types people make, as some have alot of thought but into them. But the fake types are too damn annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 They aren't really unrealistic since Konami introduced the new type of Psychic, I only find them annoying when they're just a synonym to a pre-existing type, like when someone makes a Swordmaster when there's Warrior, or Wizard when there's Spellcaster, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted December 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 They aren't really unrealistic since Konami introduced the new type of Psychic' date=' I only find them annoying when they're just a synonym to a pre-existing type, like when someone makes a Swordmaster when there's Warrior, or Wizard when there's Spellcaster, etc.[/quote']yeah exactly, that REALLY bothers me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I use (Official Type) / (Fake Type) That's what a sub type is called. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I got someone in one of my contests who made some cards with the type "Dark-Divine." I just thought... Why? What was the point? why not just make it one of the types he has to choose from? He could of had Winged-Beast, Beast Warrior, Psychic any would be fine but "Dark-Divine" uhh... I figure just let them do what they want but I still don't get why they'd do it. I vote the second one down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Ranger Gold Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 I think there fine unless like what Dark Edo Phoenix said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raelen Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Fake types are a big no-no. Anyone in one of my card contests will get an automatic lose if he/she uses a fake type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 I find fake types rather annoying. Especially if they are like that of existing types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 I used to use completley fake types, like "Girl" and "Movie" and whatnot, but now, I normally use "Angel" [Japanese version of Fairy] or use an exsisting type and make my own sub-type. They don't annoy me, I think of them as creative-ness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ғαlşє 0ρρяєşşịợи Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 I don't really care.. I find it kind of fun to use them.. Like in my Legend of Zelda set.. its just fun to use types like, Hylian or w/e.. Also, starwars is a good one - Jedi, SIth etc... They aren't really unrealistic since Konami introduced the new type of Psychic' date=' I only find them annoying when they're just a synonym to a pre-existing type, like when someone makes a Swordmaster when there's Warrior, or Wizard when there's Spellcaster, etc.[/quote']that bugs me though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 This is lulz....mah new card: Monstar Type: God / Lulz / Mudkipz / Thunder / Pikachu Effect: You win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Fake Types are good if they are well thought out, but simple things like Ninja for Naruto cards are just annoying. The Crimson One,Miranda-chan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 People, you take Fake-Types WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too seriously <. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Fake types should not be made under any condition. Sure, Konami made Psychics, but that was ONCE. ONCE. Half-on-topic: If you make a new Property, make sure that it actually is different from other Properties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.