Jump to content

Avarice is a sex beast with a sexy name


Cyber Altair

Recommended Posts

Very well. I'm no king at c&c, but w/e.

 

I like where the render is placed, it fits the sig and it's different from most others. There's amybe a little too much blank space near the top left, but it's still filled out with something, so that it's not completely empty. I've changed my ming from my previous post, I actually like the bottom one better because of the single colour, it gives more blending. I don't think taht the C4D in the middle (the thing that is partly blue on top) is necessary though, I think I would prefer it without.

 

Enough proper c&c for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfft Get Real.

 

There are 2 types of C4D's duplicated a couple of times each some on some under the render. Just look at the render and you'll find the C4D's in it adding depth and blending. Also you said it lacks everything, please point out more stuff it lacks and back it up, don't just say "bad lighting" cause that leaves no space for a decent discussion about it >.>

 

Hope, get an opinion. Taking a horrible one out of people doesn't help. Also your already in a level were you can't get worse, trust me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wtf is with the name

 

=( I have gotten anything for my CnC in your last tag. \

 

Anyways.

 

-You got some beast flow going on, IMO. The c4ds were really picked out well.

-Depth is okay. Better than most. =/

-Blending is nice. Good use of c4ds with that.

-I see how you did lighting, I think. (C4ds AGAIN, XD)

-My problem with this tag is mainly the left side. It seems a little empty, to be honest.

-The black background is actually working quite well with this piece. Compliments the feel of the tag.

-I personally like the second one better. Both are good, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wtf is with the name

 

GTFO and STFU.

 

wtf is with the name

 

=( I have gotten anything for my CnC in your last tag. \

 

Anyways.

 

-You got some beast flow going on' date=' IMO. The c4ds were really picked out well.

-Depth is okay. Better than most. =/

-Blending is nice. Good use of c4ds with that.

-I see how you did lighting, I think. (C4ds AGAIN, XD)

-My problem with this tag is mainly the left side. It seems a little empty, to be honest.

-The black background is actually working quite well with this piece. Compliments the feel of the tag.

-I personally like the second one better. Both are good, though.

[/quote']

 

<3 u =D

 

Expect your gift soon =3 I loved how you pointed out the basics and how they were done, next time make sure to also point out the dislikes ok =)

 

personally' date=' I don't think the whole thing fits together very well. it looks very synthetic and that isn't really a plus for me. I liked your old sig better.

 

what dimensions is it? it seems a little too wide.

[/quote']

 

My usual dimension, it's not too wide. It's just that YCM uses 350x125 which is bullshit size imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, no prob with blending. You nailed it ^_^

 

The bottom, as JG said, looks to have WAY more blending cuz of the colors.

 

On the lighting, I can see it, it works ^_^

 

The placing is nice, too ^_^ it distinguishes the render from the others

 

Your focal seems to have no problem, as my attention is drawn to it ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...