The official petition to I.P ban Tiger/King Of Dogs as of 25/12/08

[2sick4u]

Firstly, no, this isn't a joke. Nor is it a suggestion out of personal angst towards King Of Dogs. What this is in it's entirety, however, is nothing short of an honest suggestion to help this forum out. I believe that merely I.P banning King Of Dogs is the easiest, least flame filled option to support King of Dogs's announced departure from the site. And, if King Of Dogs is true to his word, he would have no logical reasoning behind not supporting this thread, nor to commence striking against it.

 

Let's look at the Pro's and Con's of an I.P ban on said member first:

 

Pro's

-No more flaming of a 'STOP BEING A _____' nature.

-No more 'What if ____ was back?' 'Where did all those _____ go?' threads.

-If he changes his mind, which evidence and his actual age would say he's prone to do, he'd have no hold on YCM anymore. No "I'm back.. But.. Just barely this time." to return to.

-A significantly lowered total amount of both "LawlDrama' and "YCMISSERIOUSBUSINESS.'

 

Con's

-Leaving/Return thread may be subjected to inactivity.

-I may be Neg. Rep'd for doing so.

-Tiger won't be able to lie anymore.

 

 

Okay, I'll admit, I was struggling for con's. However, my perspective remains just as valid as it was in the topic title. King Of Dogs should, by all logical rights, be faced with the option of leaving for the said time with an I.P ban for verification of one such leave, or go the other way and humbly admit that he was faking the entire course of action.

 

It's pretty basic, guys. You I.P ban him for the overall benefit of the Forum.

 

An I.P ban will kill the flaming associated with Tiger's leave, will kill the speculation of his continued deceit of his word, will effectively kill all future flaming if Tiger were to return, would kill all future flaming if Tiger were predictably leave from that return and so on.

 

This is so that King Of Dogs's gay little leave can finally be done with.

 

We on the same page? Sweet. Let's petition. Oh, right, it's official because I say so. =p.

 

 

 

[align=center]Supporters/Petition Signers:

2sick4u.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nay-Sayers[/align]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. Yes, just so you know, I'm making YCM serious business to try and stop it from being serious DRAMA business.

 

Contradiction is temporary in retrospect to what it accomplishes. =D.

 

Tl;Dr?

 

Basically, this guy has to stfu or gtfo.

[Catman25]

First of all, what's I.P? I guess his leaving is causing a lot of unwanted drama and flaming...

[2sick4u]

^I.P banning is essentially 'GTFO AND StayTFO" my forum in the form of a Administration option.

 

It basically prevents your specific computer from entering the site at all.

 

And, yeah. The only reason I'm actually bothering with this is because of how the 'Tiger' cycle just keeps on repeating and repeating.

 

Plus, the guy can't make up his own mind. As such, he should be forced to.

[monkeyman2092]

Hey, KOD is not like that!! you're post is a comeplete lie!! Sure he leaves for a bunch of times, but it's because some people mistreat him!! Put me down as resister or whatever the freak you have for people against banning KOD!! He's the nicest person I've met.

[Bloodrun]

While we cannot Ban someone because someone else wants them banned, (and placing it as, 'helping the forum' doesn't work).

 

We can however, ban someone if they ask us to, or if they do something to permit it.

 

Also, in reference to the asking to be banned, before anyone gets all "oh, so now you guys change your mind? :?"

A requested ban, is permanent. i.e. Perma Ban.