Jump to content

Another try of "My weird deck"(it still sucks)


jolle01

Recommended Posts

I've tried to do a deck once before and it did really suck and it gt so much cards in it, now i try again. Plz rate and comment.

 

Total 45 cards.

1 star monsters(3):

red eyes b. chick x2

charcoal inpachi x1

 

3 star monsters(4):

armed dragon lv3 x3

raging flame sprite x1

 

4 star monsters(10):

luster dragon x3

skilled dark magician x2

skilled white magician x1

v-tiger jet x1

w-wing catapult x1

double coston x1

gearfried the iron knight x1

 

5 star monsters(3):

armed dragon lv5 x3

 

7 star monsters(4):

red eyes b. dragon x1

dark magician x1

buster blader x1

gearfried the swordmaster x1

 

9 star monsters(1):

red eyes darkness dragon x1

 

spell/magic cards(10):

swords of revealing light x2

swords of concealing light x1

monster reborn x1

heavy storm x1

mystic space typhoon x1

dian keto the cure master x1

necklace of command x1

polymerization x1

release restraint x1

 

trap cards(10):

torrential tribute x1

trap jammer x1

dust tornado x1

solemn wishes x1

enchanted javelin x1

threatening roar x1

shift x1

magical hats x1

magic cylinder x1

covering fire x1

__________________

fusion deck(3):

five headed dragon x1

dark paladin x1

vw-tiger catapult x1

 

side deck(15):

slifer the sky dragon x1

obelisk the tormentor x1

winged dragon of ra x1

blue eyes w. dragon x1

(a weird chines card) x1

the fiend megacyber x3

goblin attack force x1

shadowslayer x1

winged kuriboh x1

horn of the unicorn x1

malevolent nuzzler x3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colonel Sanders says that this deck sucks monkey balls.

I know' date=' notice "(it still sucks)". I dont got so good cards, how should i get more good cards?[hr']

Colonel Sanders says that this deck sucks monkey balls.

I know' date=' notice "(it still sucks)". I dont got so good cards, how should i get more good cards?

[/quote']

I traded it with a stupid friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total 45 cards.

1 star monsters(3):

red eyes b. chick -2 (helps get out bad card)

charcoal inpachi -1 (Vanilla, attacks are uncommon now)

 

3 star monsters(4):

armed dragon lv3 -3 (too slow)

raging flame sprite -1 (not likely to last long)

 

4 star monsters(10):

luster dragon -1 (vanilla)

skilled dark magician -1 (helps get out useless card)

skilled white magician -1 (helps get out useless card)

v-tiger jet -1 (vanilla)

w-wing catapult -1 (unions are slow)

double coston -1 (tributes shouldn't be used much)

gearfried the iron knight -1 (only good with Butterfly Dagger- Elma)

 

5 star monsters(3):

armed dragon lv5 -3 (waste of space)

 

7 star monsters(4):

red eyes b. dragon -1 (Vanilla)

dark magician -1 (Vanilla)

buster blader -1 (no, only good against Dragon decks, which don't see much play)

gearfried the swordmaster -1 (waste)

 

9 star monsters(1):

red eyes darkness dragon -1 (waste of space requires you to run "Red Eyes")

 

spell/magic cards(10):

swords of revealing light -2 (likely to be destroyed)

swords of concealing light -1 (no, likely to be destroyed)

dian keto the cure master -1 (no, better cards exist)

necklace of command -1 (equips are bad)

polymerization -1 (too slow, waste of space)

release restraint -1 (waste for a 3 card combo that doesn't help much)

 

trap cards(10):

trap jammer -1 (unlikely to be usable)

dust tornado -1 (slow)

solemn wishes -1 (waste, likely to be destroyed)

enchanted javelin -1 (if you want health, use something else)

shift -1 (waste)

magical hats -1 (waste, people don't attack that much anymore)

magic cylinder -1 (good card, too slow)

covering fire -1

__________________

fusion deck(3):

five headed dragon -1 (overly hard to summon)

dark paladin -1 (waste of space)

vw-tiger catapult -1 (awful)

 

side deck(15):

slifer the sky dragon -1 (illegal)

obelisk the tormentor -1 (illegal)

winged dragon of ra -1 (illegal)

blue eyes w. dragon -1

(a weird chines card) -1

the fiend megacyber -1

goblin attack force -1

shadowslayer -1

winged kuriboh -1

horn of the unicorn -1

malevolent nuzzler -3

 

 

awful deck, sorry.

Also, about getting cards, the structure decks have some good stuff in them. get those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically one only runs red eyes if they are making an entire deck built around him and his other forms. And to be honest it doesn't looks like you have enough red eyes cards to allow such a deck to be built.

 

My name is evil gave pretty good advice. Aside from my red eyes comment I can't really say a whole lot more.

 

Oh! one last thing I just remembered, try to keep you deck size as close to the 40 card minimum as possible. This lets you draw your decks best cards more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you like Red-Eyes a lot' date=' you can make a Red-Eyes Deck.

Then it becomes viable.

Your choice.

[/quote']

 

It is still possible to build a half decent Red-Eyes Deck but it requires spending even more money than on 3 Zombie World or 3 Dark Emperor Structure Decks. Allure of Darkness is the main culperit. Without Allure of Darkness, you have Hand Destruction and Dark World Dealings to work with for draw power. Those 2 arent ideal outside of Turbo or OTK Decks because of the -1 hand advantage both those cards create and Red-Eyes is hardly an OTK strategy without Dimension Fusion legal in Advanced Play. You could use Return from the Different Dimension but compared to Dimension Fusion, it is no where near as reliable. D.D.R. doesnt give you the ATK power needed to OTK for a Red-Eyes Deck either. Apart from Five-Headed Dragon, there are no monsters in a TCG Red-Eyes Deck that can be Special Summoned to cause game winning damage. 5000 + 2400 =/= 8000. A way of getting the needed damage is to throw in Dark Armed Dragon but then it becomes a five-card OTK. D.D.R. counts as 2 cards because of the cost involved in activating it.

 

This all proves there is no cheap (money-wise) and consistent Red-Eyes OTK available in the TCG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

magical hats -1 (waste' date=' people don't attack that much anymore)

magic cylinder -1 (good card, too slow)

covering fire -1

[/quote']

 

my comment is to the cards above and to nothing and to noone other than my name is evil

why would you comment on magic cylinder as being to slow and not commenting on the fact that covering fire is A)slower B) requires 2 monsters on your side which magic cylinder does not and C)state that since "people don't attack any more" that it is a good card and again say nothing about covering fire, now what about Mirror Force? it is just as slow as magic cylinder and again requires people to attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

magical hats -1 (waste' date=' people don't attack that much anymore)

magic cylinder -1 (good card, too slow)

covering fire -1

[/quote']

 

my comment is to the cards above and to nothing and to noone other than my name is evil

why would you comment on magic cylinder as being to slow and not commenting on the fact that covering fire is A)slower B) requires 2 monsters on your side which magic cylinder does not and C)state that since "people don't attack any more" that it is a good card and again say nothing about covering fire, now what about Mirror Force? it is just as slow as magic cylinder and again requires people to attack

 

i didn't choose to write that Covering Fire was slow because I assumed by that point people would have gotten the point.

Also, Mirror Force IS to slow to be used effectively, that's why it isn't run much anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tell me' date=' are you playing against people running D.A.D, JD and Lightsworn? Or playing in tournaments?

[/quote']

No, I just playing against my friends.

 

But 3 "Dark Emperor" or 3 "Zombie World" costs money like hell' date=' and my parents never let me do that.

[/quote']

 

Save up for them then. It may take a while but it will be worth it.

I got money enough to buy them, but my parents dont want me to buy anymore cards.

 

If you like Red-Eyes a lot' date=' you can make a Red-Eyes Deck.

Then it becomes viable.

Your choice.

[/quote']

I dont really like Red-Eyes, I wondered if I'm going to do a "Dragon Buster" deck.


Its illegal. Read the ban list and youll find it. I officially label this Deck illegal and terrible. As for the Structure Decks' date=' none of the ones you mentioned are good. Get 3 Dark Emperor or 3 Zombie World Structure Decks. Those are the only Structure Decks you can really generate a semi-viable Deck.

[/quote']

 

Wich should i take then? 3 Zombie Worlds or 3 Dark Emperor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tell me' date=' are you playing against people running D.A.D, JD and Lightsworn? Or playing in tournaments?

[/quote']

No, I just playing against my friends.

 

But 3 "Dark Emperor" or 3 "Zombie World" costs money like hell' date=' and my parents never let me do that.

[/quote']

 

Save up for them then. It may take a while but it will be worth it.

I got money enough to buy them, but my parents dont want me to buy anymore cards.

 

that sucks.

 

If you like Red-Eyes a lot' date=' you can make a Red-Eyes Deck.

Then it becomes viable.

Your choice.

[/quote']

I dont really like Red-Eyes, I wondered if I'm going to do a "Dragon Buster" deck.


 

so what, use Buster Blader as a win-condition? I would say try something more consistent.

 

Its illegal. Read the ban list and youll find it. I officially label this Deck illegal and terrible. As for the Structure Decks' date=' none of the ones you mentioned are good. Get 3 Dark Emperor or 3 Zombie World Structure Decks. Those are the only Structure Decks you can really generate a semi-viable Deck.

[/quote']

 

Wich should i take then? 3 Zombie Worlds or 3 Dark Emperor?

 

Zombie World has more Draw Power, Zombies seem so lack it.

Also, maybe try to get several Allure of Darkess cards. They will seriously help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...