bury the year Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Shiba Warrior TaroBeast-Warrior/Tuner/EARTH/Level 2/ATK 800/DEF 600This card cannot be destroyed by battle. (Damage calculation is applied normally.) When a card on the field is destroyed by battle or is destroyed by a card effect, return this face-up card to its owner's hand. Most adorable tuner. EVAR. (Check on Manjyome Thunder for the pic.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Already spotted this, nothing special :PIf it was a beast, Rescue'd get a LV2 tuner...guess not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Actually, this is kinda what I wished for to make Barbaros Ur working...I like it, but nothing better than Carrier, Airbellum or Krebons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 being a beast-warrior makes this much less playable than if it was a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 being a beast-warrior makes this much less playable than if it was a beast. Being a Spellcaster makes Night End's Sorcerer much less playable than if it was a Zombie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Why do people always want cards to be more popular types? They make cards like this to add support to different Types and enable people to make different decks, not to fit into the metagame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Why do people always want cards to be more popular types? They make cards like this to add support to different Types and enable people to make different decks' date=' not to fit into the metagame.[/quote'] True dat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 finally...someone sees my philosophy.i try to build decks the way i want,not the way competition wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted November 27, 2008 Report Share Posted November 27, 2008 okay card. will never use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 being a beast-warrior makes this much less playable than if it was a beast. Being a Spellcaster makes Night End's Sorcerer much less playable than if it was a Zombie. No, it doesn't. As a Zombie, it would always be outclassed by Carrier; as a Spellcaster, it has niche use with Apprentice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? And, anyway, this might be the first Reaper-esque card that's actually banworthy. At least in mine book. Whaddya think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? And' date=' anyway, this might be the first Reaper-esque card that's actually banworthy. At least in mine book. Whaddya think?[/quote'] thats what i thought but then i remembered skill drain. its tuner + invincibility + self returnable with a dash of skill drain proff added to the mix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? ... What? I hit it with my Axe Raider. It survives. Next turn you set Koumori Dragon. Axe Raider runs it over. Taro bounces itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? ... What? I hit it with my Axe Raider. It survives. Next turn you set Koumori Dragon. Axe Raider runs it over. Taro bounces itself. lol' date=' someone is running Axe Raider and Koumori Dragon. [Level 3 bastards, i have 150 posts.'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? ... What? I hit it with my Axe Raider. It survives. Next turn you set Koumori Dragon. Axe Raider runs it over. Taro bounces itself. lol' date=' someone is running Axe Raider and Koumori Dragon.[/quote'] You missed the point. As usual. [Level 3 b****es' date= i have 150 posts.] Yes, and they were all terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When a card on the field is destroyed by battle lolwut? ... What? I hit it with my Axe Raider. It survives. Next turn you set Koumori Dragon. Axe Raider runs it over. Taro bounces itself. lol' date=' someone is running Axe Raider and Koumori Dragon.[/quote'] You missed the point. As usual. [Level 3 b****es' date= i have 150 posts.] Yes, and they were all terrible. just doing my job, oh great crab helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.