Jump to content

Card Discussion: Marshmellon


Recommended Posts

reaper >>>>>>>> This

 

Also

Marshmallon has it's Glasses' date='though.Spirit Reaper has nothing:/

[/quote']

 

Ojama's have Ojamagic, Ojamuscle, Ojama Delta Hurricane, Ojama King and Ojama Knight.

 

Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End only has Primal Seed

 

Therefore

 

Ojama Yellow >>>>> Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End

 

i dont think Crab can top that! +rep for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spirit Reaper > This

 

Dont get me wrong, Marshmellon is a good card, but Spirit Reaper is just better that Marshmellon, and Crab stated all reasons.

 

Marshmallon has it's Glasses' date='though.Spirit Reaper has nothing:/

[/quote']

 

OBJECTION!

 

Spirit Reaper has Common Zombie/DARK Support! And that Nightmare Horse guy (<- Mehish by the way) to make Reaper on the Nightmare, which is better.

 

Marshmellon has few LIGHT supports and stupid little glasses.

 

Even without support Spirit Reaper is better! Spirit Reaper FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards, while ignoring everything else. Watch, in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

 

Fine. What if he was a WIND Sea Serpent? Would he still be as good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

 

Fine. What if he was a WIND Sea Serpent? Would he still be as good?

 

He would not be as good as he currently is; however, he would still be better than Marshmallon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

 

Fine. What if he was a WIND Sea Serpent? Would he still be as good?

 

He would not be as good as he currently is; however, he would still be better than Marshmallon.

 

Talk about racism. :P

 

Sea Serpents, Fishes, Reptiles, Rocks, Pyros, Aquas, Beasts (maybe), Beast-Warriors, Winged Beasts, Fairies, and possibly Psychics in the future need more support.

 

Konami is racist against the above and are for Dragons (tho' they're awesome), Zombies, Warriors, and Fiends.

 

Say anything I might have missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

 

Fine. What if he was a WIND Sea Serpent? Would he still be as good?

 

He would not be as good as he currently is; however, he would still be better than Marshmallon.

 

Talk about racism. :P

 

Sea Serpents, Fishes, Reptiles, Rocks, Pyros, Aquas, Beasts (maybe), Beast-Warriors, Winged Beasts, Fairies, and possibly Psychics in the future need more support.

 

Konami is racist against the above and are for Dragons (tho' they're awesome), Zombies, Warriors, and Fiends.

 

Say anything I might have missed.

 

I was not being racist. They just have the least support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went crazy and super juiced DARK cards' date=' while ignoring everything else.

[/quote']

 

My post spent twenty-two sentences explaining why Spirit Reaper was superior to Marshmallon. Of those twenty-two sentences, only four even mentioned either card's Type or Attribute.

 

Watch' date=' in a few metas, about 5 booster packs away, Marshmallon will be better than Spirit Reaper. And, I will bring this thread back.

[/quote']

 

You do that.

 

We'll wait.

 

Fine. What if he was a WIND Sea Serpent? Would he still be as good?

 

He would not be as good as he currently is; however, he would still be better than Marshmallon.

 

Talk about racism. :P

 

Sea Serpents, Fishes, Reptiles, Rocks, Pyros, Aquas, Beasts (maybe), Beast-Warriors, Winged Beasts, Fairies, and possibly Psychics in the future need more support.

 

Konami is racist against the above and are for Dragons (tho' they're awesome), Zombies, Warriors, and Fiends.

 

Say anything I might have missed.

 

I was not being racist. They just have the least support.

 

I already know you're not trying to be racist. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a large factor for Spirit Reaper's playability is his Attribute and Type as someone said. I mean, the positive effects is something you'll rarely do, and if you plan on attacking directly a beat stick is more sufficient than -1 card at the cost of lots of LP when your opponent attacks back. And the neg effect is annoying.

 

Marshmallon is good for burns(dur), but besides that pretty bland.

 

But w/e the funk Marshmallon's type is, and LIGHT will never overcome Zombie's back from the graveness and protection, and DARK's twenty various, and OP'd, uses. (Your Reaper can easily be CCV'd when he runs into danger and allure'd when not needed and the such. Marshmallon can....um...use Honest?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a large factor for Spirit Reaper's playability is his Attribute and Type as someone said. I mean' date=' the positive effects is something you'll rarely do, and if you plan on attacking directly a beat stick is more sufficient than -1 card at the cost of lots of LP when your opponent attacks back. And the neg effect is annoying.

 

Marshmallon is good for burns(dur), but besides that pretty bland.

 

But w/e the f*** Marshmallon's type is, and LIGHT will never overcome Zombie's back from the graveness and protection, and DARK's twenty various, and OP'd, uses. (Your Reaper can easily be CCV'd when he runs into danger and allure'd when not needed and the such. Marshmallon can....um...use Honest?)

[/quote']

 

The only reason Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went overboard with DARK cards, while ignoring the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a large factor for Spirit Reaper's playability is his Attribute and Type as someone said. I mean' date=' the positive effects is something you'll rarely do, and if you plan on attacking directly a beat stick is more sufficient than -1 card at the cost of lots of LP when your opponent attacks back. And the neg effect is annoying.

 

Marshmallon is good for burns(dur), but besides that pretty bland.

 

But w/e the f*** Marshmallon's type is, and LIGHT will never overcome Zombie's back from the graveness and protection, and DARK's twenty various, and OP'd, uses. (Your Reaper can easily be CCV'd when he runs into danger and allure'd when not needed and the such. Marshmallon can....um...use Honest?)

[/quote']

 

The only reason Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went overboard with DARK cards, while ignoring the rest.

 

Would you care to refute paragraphs 2 and 3 of my long post, or are you just going to stick your fingers in your ears?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a large factor for Spirit Reaper's playability is his Attribute and Type as someone said. I mean' date=' the positive effects is something you'll rarely do, and if you plan on attacking directly a beat stick is more sufficient than -1 card at the cost of lots of LP when your opponent attacks back. And the neg effect is annoying.

 

Marshmallon is good for burns(dur), but besides that pretty bland.

 

But w/e the f*** Marshmallon's type is, and LIGHT will never overcome Zombie's back from the graveness and protection, and DARK's twenty various, and OP'd, uses. (Your Reaper can easily be CCV'd when he runs into danger and allure'd when not needed and the such. Marshmallon can....um...use Honest?)

[/quote']

 

The only reason Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went overboard with DARK cards, while ignoring the rest.

 

Would you care to refute paragraphs 2 and 3 of my long post, or are you just going to stick your fingers in your ears?

 

Probably. But, let's see you make a good deck using a Spirit Reaper that has no DARK support. He would be lower than Marshmallon if his type got changed to a WIND Sea Serpent. No matter how much you disagree, it's true. If he were those types, Marshmallon would go into decks LONG before him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a large factor for Spirit Reaper's playability is his Attribute and Type as someone said. I mean' date=' the positive effects is something you'll rarely do, and if you plan on attacking directly a beat stick is more sufficient than -1 card at the cost of lots of LP when your opponent attacks back. And the neg effect is annoying.

 

Marshmallon is good for burns(dur), but besides that pretty bland.

 

But w/e the f*** Marshmallon's type is, and LIGHT will never overcome Zombie's back from the graveness and protection, and DARK's twenty various, and OP'd, uses. (Your Reaper can easily be CCV'd when he runs into danger and allure'd when not needed and the such. Marshmallon can....um...use Honest?)

[/quote']

 

The only reason Spirit Reaper is better is because Konami went overboard with DARK cards, while ignoring the rest.

 

Would you care to refute paragraphs 2 and 3 of my long post, or are you just going to stick your fingers in your ears?

 

Probably. But, let's see you make a good deck using a Spirit Reaper that has no DARK support. He would be lower than Marshmallon if his type got changed to a WIND Sea Serpent. No matter how much you disagree, it's true. If he were those types, Marshmallon would go into decks LONG before him.

 

Without his DARK/Zombie support, Spirit Reaper would not be used in the current meta, and Marshmallon still would not be used either. Again, Ookazi is superior to Sparks, but neither are used; similarly, a WIND/Sea Serpent version of Spirit Reaper is superior to Marshmallon, but neither would be used in this meta.

 

Again, paragraphs two and three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...