Jump to content

Need a moment? Chew it over with TWIX. [How would Scapegoat change the Meta?]


Recommended Posts

Plasma control could become more popular and people would have to run things to get rid of it?

 

Do you think Plasma Control would be able to stop Tele-DaD and Lightsworn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plasma Control will become a viable deck.

 

That's about it.

 

(Unless Plasma Control = D-END).

 

Do you mean D-END of Tele-DaD and Lightsworn being the best decks in the Meta?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plasma Control will become a viable deck.

 

That's about it.

 

(Unless Plasma Control = D-END).

 

Do you mean D-END of Tele-DaD and Lightsworn being the best decks in the Meta?

 

I think He meant Destiny End Dragoon decks becoming viable.

 

Thanks for ruining my attempt at humor.

 

I don't think there would be a problem if Scapegoat was unlimited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... except for all those idiots screamin'' date=' "NOES! THE GAMEZZZZZZ BECOME BORINGZZZZ!"

[/quote']

 

You could just tech Mad Archfiend in Tele-DaD decks and Scapegoat wouldn't be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... except for all those idiots screamin'' date=' "NOES! THE GAMEZZZZZZ BECOME BORINGZZZZ!"

[/quote']

 

You could just tech Mad Archfiend in Tele-DaD decks and Scapegoat wouldn't be a problem.

 

Mad Archfiend fails. These are better

 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Twin_Breaker

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Machine_Lord_%C3%9Cr

 

Machine Lord Ur is a horrible card.

 

Twin Breaker isn't that good either.

 

I think Mad Archfiend is better than both of those cards.

 

The point is Mad Archfiend could easily make Scapegoat useless for your opponent.

 

Would Scapegoat being unlimited make Plasma Control top-tier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... except for all those idiots screamin'' date=' "NOES! THE GAMEZZZZZZ BECOME BORINGZZZZ!"

[/quote']

 

You could just tech Mad Archfiend in Tele-DaD decks and Scapegoat wouldn't be a problem.

 

Mad Archfiend fails. These are better

 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Twin_Breaker

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Machine_Lord_%C3%9Cr

 

Machine Lord Ur is a horrible card.

 

Twin Breaker isn't that good either.

 

I think Mad Archfiend is better than both of those cards.

 

The point is Mad Archfiend could easily make Scapegoat useless for your opponent.

 

No one has really answered the question though. How would Scapegoat being unlimited change the Meta?

 

Wait, hang on

 

Mad Archfiend

During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. When this face-up Attack Position monster is selected as an attack target, change it to Defense Position.

 

Twin Breaker

During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. If this card attacks a Defense Position monster, this card card can attack once more in a row.

 

I fail to see how your logic that Mad Archfiend is better against Scapegoat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... except for all those idiots screamin'' date=' "NOES! THE GAMEZZZZZZ BECOME BORINGZZZZ!"

[/quote']

 

You could just tech Mad Archfiend in Tele-DaD decks and Scapegoat wouldn't be a problem.

 

Mad Archfiend fails. These are better

 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Twin_Breaker

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Machine_Lord_%C3%9Cr

 

Machine Lord Ur is a horrible card.

 

Twin Breaker isn't that good either.

 

I think Mad Archfiend is better than both of those cards.

 

The point is Mad Archfiend could easily make Scapegoat useless for your opponent.

 

No one has really answered the question though. How would Scapegoat being unlimited change the Meta?

 

Wait, hang on

 

Mad Archfiend

During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. When this face-up Attack Position monster is selected as an attack target, change it to Defense Position.

 

Twin Breaker

During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. If this card attacks a Defense Position monster, this card card can attack once more in a row.

 

I fail to see how your logic that Mad Archfiend is better against Scapegoat.

 

Mad Archfiend can take out Stratos, Laquari, and some other monsters that are used a lot in the Meta.

 

Twin Breaker only has 1600 ATK, and it can't even take out Stratos. Mad Archfiend would be a better choice because not only could it be useful against Scapegoat, it can take out some other monsters too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, Cannon soldier/Driver burn ftw. Plasma control, 12 free monsters. Almost like 6 Threatening roars. TDMG otk, Plasma Control. The sudden rise in price of Asura priest, Airknight, baboon, and Battle Mania. Swap/Mystic Box control.

 

As for meta breaking.... Is Goats even being decked/Sided lately? o.O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plasma Control wouldn't go BEATING DAD, Plasma Control would simply be incorporated into DAD.

 

Drop the Destiny heroes being run now for a set of Plasmas and a set of Dreadmasters and run 3 Scapegoat and 2 Trade-In. (Of course keep Mali)

 

And wallah, you've whipped yourself up a deck that's now ridiculous early game. (TeleDAD) and can still win Control-style victories late-game. (Plasma Control)

 

In other words, you'll have created a monster even worse then the one we have on our hands now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...