Sigma Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side,the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side' date='the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it[/quote'] I lol'd. "zomg dont mess wid da mods they will knock u out blud". No. The Moderator's should be fair and just, and accept opposite viewpoints to theirs. And Bloodrun, you do realise that those Screenshots have been posted at least 6 times before, don't you? Draco could have easily got them from YCM from one of those times. Moderator's should not make themselves seem self-perfect and they should accept the traits that they have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side' date='the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,[b']i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it[/b] I mean I thank you. But, thats not the kind of image that we want spreading around about the Mods. We don't do things to spite people. Or to people we hate. We simply act upon rules that are broken. No more, no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side' date='the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,[b']i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it[/b] I mean I thank you. But, thats not the kind of image that we want spreading around about the Mods. We don't do things to spite people. Or to people we hate. We simply act upon rules that are broken. No more, no less. Please point out the rule that says "Please do not give people fair and just negative reputation points", I seem to have missed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigma Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 okz,sorry Bloodrun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side' date='the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,[b']i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it[/b] I mean I thank you. But, thats not the kind of image that we want spreading around about the Mods. We don't do things to spite people. Or to people we hate. We simply act upon rules that are broken. No more, no less. Please point out the rule that says "Please do not give people fair and just negative reputation points", I seem to have missed it. alright.Proove to me that those reps shouldnt have been removed.Its not up for discussion, eitherway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I take Bloodrun's side' date='the Mods could lock forums,ban you,and other stuff,[b']i suggest you don't mess with Mods Draco,you could get banned before you know it[/b] I mean I thank you. But, thats not the kind of image that we want spreading around about the Mods. We don't do things to spite people. Or to people we hate. We simply act upon rules that are broken. No more, no less. Please point out the rule that says "Please do not give people fair and just negative reputation points", I seem to have missed it. alright.Proove to me that those reps shouldnt have been removed.Its not up for discussion, eitherway. Matt has already shown Screenshot evidence.So I don't even need to prove anything, especially not to the likes of you.It should be up for discussion; the Moderator's need to learn that they have traits, and that if they are negged, they need reasoning and proof that it shouldn't be removed. Moderator's on this forum try to make themselves seem self-perfect, when, in fact: they are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I know normal mods can't remove their own repsI neutralled Luke for changing his name too much' date=' and he simply deleted it. :X[/quote']The thing that people don't seem to grasp is that regular mods can't delete ANY reps, let alone their own >_< Also, both those pics seem to show things said by Kaze, not JoC. The only thing I see from JoC is the suggestion to spy, which was in response to Kaze's post, which validates maybe one of your 2 -reps. Either way, I don't see why you're hounding JoC about it, especially since it was nearly 3 months ago. Moderator's on this forum try to make themselves seem self-perfectlolwut? I think there's maybe 3 or 4 mods who don't have any neutral or negative reps (not counting myself). You really think we're trying to make ourselves look "self-perfect"? P.S. lrn2apostrophe ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I know normal mods can't remove their own repsI neutralled Luke for changing his name too much' date=' and he simply deleted it. :X[/quote']The thing that people don't seem to grasp is that regular mods can't delete ANY reps, let alone their own >_< Also, both those pics seem to show things said by Kaze, not JoC. The only thing I see from JoC is the suggestion to spy, which was in response to Kaze's post, which validates maybe one of your 2 -reps. Either way, I don't see why you're hounding JoC about it, especially since it was nearly 3 months ago. If you people don't get that the Mods can't remove their own reps then they don't pay attention and are obviously dumbasses. Why is is "hounding" JoC for it now and not 3 months ago? Well, go check the ban logs, I believe he didn't have the chance. And suggesting to spy on SXR for revenge is very low and pathetic, I'd neg someone for that.I know normal mods can't remove their own repsI neutralled Luke for changing his name too much' date=' and he simply deleted it. :X[/quote']The thing that people don't seem to grasp is that regular mods can't delete ANY reps, let alone their own >_< Also, both those pics seem to show things said by Kaze, not JoC. The only thing I see from JoC is the suggestion to spy, which was in response to Kaze's post, which validates maybe one of your 2 -reps. Either way, I don't see why you're hounding JoC about it, especially since it was nearly 3 months ago. Moderator's on this forum try to make themselves seem self-perfectlolwut? I think there's maybe 3 or 4 mods who don't have any neutral or negative reps (not counting myself). You really think we're trying to make ourselves look "self-perfect"? P.S. lrn2apostrophe ;) o_OWuts this? Browa's trying to use internet memes? And yes, I do believe that. Everyone has a fault/trait, and has probably had a fair neg for doing so. I could neg Bloodrun for various things right now, and vise-versa. Thing is, his would get removed 'cause "lolhe'smod" and mine probably wouldn't get removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 And suggesting to spy on SXR for revenge is very low and pathetic' date=' I'd neg someone for that. Wuts this? Browa's trying to use internet memes? And yes, I do believe that. Everyone has a fault/trait, and has probably had a fair neg for doing so. I could neg Bloodrun for various things right now, and vise-versa. Thing is, his would get removed 'cause "lolhe'smod" and mine probably wouldn't get removed.[/quote']Hence why I said "proves maybe one of the -reps". Yeah, stopping now >_> I have never ever gotten a neg (except spammy ones from Matty Lane), and I'm rather proud of that. As for you and bloody negging each other, I would have to see the reasons behind them, and if they were valid I'd leave them, even Bloody's. You should see how many times I've looked over negs and left them (even on mods) because they were appropriate. Not everyone is out to keep a perfect image, and I resent that you would include those who aren't in your reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted October 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 And suggesting to spy on SXR for revenge is very low and pathetic' date=' I'd neg someone for that. Wuts this? Browa's trying to use internet memes? And yes, I do believe that. Everyone has a fault/trait, and has probably had a fair neg for doing so. I could neg Bloodrun for various things right now, and vise-versa. Thing is, his would get removed 'cause "lolhe'smod" and mine probably wouldn't get removed.[/quote']Hence why I said "proves maybe one of the -reps". Yeah, stopping now >_> I have never ever gotten a neg (except spammy ones from Matty Lane), and I'm rather proud of that. As for you and bloody negging each other, I would have to see the reasons behind them, and if they were valid I'd leave them, even Bloody's. You should see how many times I've looked over negs and left them (even on mods) because they were appropriate. Not everyone is out to keep a perfect image, and I resent that you would include those who aren't in your reply. The shots were on Encyclopedia Dramatica. They have been there for months. Must I list every reason or will you just accept that you're imperfect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I'm not going to read your entire post, but I will say that negative reps are pointless, just like any other kind of rep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted October 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I'm not going to read your entire post' date=' but I will say that negative reps are pointless, just like any other kind of rep.[/quote'] The principle still stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.