Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Chimeratech_Fortress_Dragon Remember the good old days, when I once offered a rep to anyone who could give me a good reason to not run this card in 3s in every deck you owned? Ah, good times... Anyway, now that Cyber Dragon is Limited, and the Machine Aggro deck as a viable option is dead, it's lost some of its charm, but it could still find its way into some decks, provided your Extra Deck had the room. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 A card that makes running an entire type a liability at the cost of a normal summon. A card the decimates an opponents field... as a cost. Banned on any good list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 punishes the opponent for summoning cydra and a machine, should be banned. it creates instant advantage if your opponent has 2 or more machines on the field ( if 1 of them is cydra) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 Wow. If this card gets made, someone will make an OTK based on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 Really good card, but should be banned if the US ever gets it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 people would run this in their extra decks just to use cydra against the person who played it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Viable tech against those who (still) run Machines, with its lolatk qualities... other than that, it stinks. Outside your opponent playing Machines, I could fare better playing Tyranno Infinity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainsaw20x6 Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 you dont have an opponent that uses machines, just DNA Surgery, make all monsters machines, perhaps play a scapegoat too, to add another 4000 atk, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Ban Chimeratech Fortress Dragon? Try locking it up in a 1st class security cage run by the craphole U.S. government. Also, I love the art. ~Shade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Not as deadly as when Cyber Dragon was at 2 or 3. I love the art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Why do people insist on saying it's "not as deadly"? Did it's text changed during the time before the September 1st banlist, and the time after? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Bad players don't understand how bad Gyazarus is for the meta. xD ~Shade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Bad players don't understand how bad Gyazarus is for the meta. xD ~Shade Really bad players don't understnad how bad Emergency Teleport is for the meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Just cause you don't have them doesn't it doesn't give you a right to criticize players who do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Just cause you don't have them doesn't it doesn't give you a right to criticize players who do. ZOMG unlimit Crush Card! Clearly tilting the game into the hands of the rich players is what we really need to do. Let's give the top-five spenders extra Gold Sarcophagus' while we're at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 That's not what I meant. People aren't stupid for playing and owning the cards, they're stupid for the cheap methods they use to get the cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 I think CCV is incredibly bad for the game but i'd run it if I had it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 I think CCV is incredibly bad for the game but i'd run it if I had it.Me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Meta? What meta, seeing as Cyber Dragon itslef is broken beyond belief? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Meta? What meta' date=' seeing as Cyber Dragon itslef is broken beyond belief?[/quote'] It's bad because, unless you wish to ban Proto-Cyber Dragon, Machine Type decks are dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporal Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Why do people insist on saying it's "not as deadly"? Did it's text changed during the time before the September 1st banlist' date=' and the time after?[/quote'] Because Cydra is limited maybe?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 no reason to not run it imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted October 10, 2008 Report Share Posted October 10, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Meta? What meta' date=' seeing as Cyber Dragon itslef is broken beyond belief?[/quote'] It's bad because, unless you wish to ban Proto-Cyber Dragon, Machine Type decks are dead. Irrelevant. 'Tis just useful tech against Machines, turning whatever conjurings they've contrived into a lolatk monster. Gosh, what's wrong with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted October 10, 2008 Report Share Posted October 10, 2008 Bad players dont understand how this card is bad for the meta Meta? What meta' date=' seeing as Cyber Dragon itslef is broken beyond belief?[/quote'] It's bad because, unless you wish to ban Proto-Cyber Dragon, Machine Type decks are dead. Irrelevant. 'Tis just useful tech against Machines, turning whatever conjurings they've contrived into a lolatk monster. Gosh, what's wrong with that?let me explain it for you. you summon a bunch of little guys, preferably machines, but i can make do with anything as long as i have DNA surgery on the field (hopefully face down and cydra. on my turn I play cydra (or you did which is even better) and i send them all YOUR monsters away for a 4000+ beatstick. and then I heavy storm you.and then just to go for the overkill, i play a bunch of little guys as well FoTK. does that explain why well enough, or are you still lost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.