Deity Mitsu Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 Awesome.I'm entering every time :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogger Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 Hmmm....you're not the only one DM.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deity Mitsu Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 Hehehe I know I'm not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSB Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 I'd be in. Making cards is so much fun! But lets hope we all don't get sued for copy write infringement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted August 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 Since this thread has become so popular, I'm going to try to update every second day, rather than wait a week. So, once I get through a few more entries, I'll start having a contest or two to see what card I will add next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 Since this thread has become so popular' date=' I'm going to try to update every second day, rather than wait a week. So, once I get through a few more entries, I'll start having a contest or two to see what card I will add next.[/quote'] don't you think a sec is too much I think you meant by day :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 That card would be banned/limited.His 2nd efect is Multi-Trigger, so he CAN be flipped face-down in your opponents turn, making it capable of eating 2 monsters before I could kill it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted August 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 What makes the effect Multi-Trigger? Also, even if it is, it's not how the effect was intended to be used when it was made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gungeransu Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 I see what he's saying. The effect is sort of misleading. Most cards, like Moai Interceptor Cannons, say "Once per turn, during your Main Phase...", but this one just says "Once per turn...". I'm not sure if that's Multi-trigger, though. Nothing really triggers the second effect, just the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 It IS Multi-Trigger.Or else, it must have been "during your Main-Phase", what gungeransu said. P.S. In order to find the best card of the week, you must also check links on people's signatures.... (hint, hint)..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted August 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 It IS Multi-Trigger.Or else' date=' it must have been "during your Main-Phase", what gungeransu said. P.S. In order to find the best card of the week, you must also check links on people's signatures.... (hint, hint).....[/quote']It does not need to specify "during your Main Phase". It's implied its effect is spell speed 1 and can only activate during your Main Phase. The only way it could be considered to be Spell Speed 2 is if it said: "You can activatet his effect during either player's turn", like Strike Ninja or D.D. Crow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deity Mitsu Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 I am the card maker.Old Master,that is not how I intended the card to be played.God Kaze is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenBray Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 GK, any ideas about your next card review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kallan Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 The card is almost broken, but since the wording and grammar hardly have a mistake, I have to give it a 9.5/10. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted August 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 The next card review will be today. I;m working on the article now. Like I said, a week is WAY to long to wait with all that talent out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenBray Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 The card is almost broken After looking at it, this card starts to act like the Spirit card Tsukuyomi. But why do you think it's almost borken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 I am the card maker.Old Master' date='that is not how I intended the card to be played.God Kaze is correct.[/quote'] Fine.But I should edit it, and add "during your Main Phase" to the card;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted August 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 New article posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giga Bowser X Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 Hmmm.... Now that's an interesting card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenBray Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 With no offence intended, but regardless of whether of not it is banned, no serious tournament level player would use this card because of the overall dependency on the opponent. But, the effect is still very interesting and the combo possibilites with this card could make it a potent weapon outside of tournament play, but in tournament play, only by tricking your opponent into attacking it could this card be used effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSB Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 Really, not even usable in battle. God! How did this get COTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 Great I honored to have won the point of the card is to play a weak monster then your opponent attacks! then cyber man destroys it I thought it was great. I think if your opponent now knows he wont attack any more so I don't think it would be banned but, who am I to argue. Just stating my opinion :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deity Mitsu Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 I thought it was a good card,especially if you want to stall your opponent until you can get a stronger monster on the field.This could be used quite effectively in a stall deck.I think its a cool card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwhale Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 This could also work well if you have a card to force your opponent to attack & that card with the shield that makes it so you can only attack a specific monster I think somthing magnatism can't remember :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogger Posted August 23, 2007 Report Share Posted August 23, 2007 As if we need more good machine monsters.... Although the dependancy on opponent kinda goes against it. Lightning Vortex laughs at this card. This is a good card, but I wouldn't run it in 3's. I wonder if we should make a list of all the would-be-if-real banned/limited/semi-limited cards. That would be interesting...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.