BDKMRV Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Doesn't need to be banned. Can be destroyed easily if you have the right cards.Oh and Dragon Capture Jar FTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Now... imagine if the "once per turn" part didn't exist.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDKMRV Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Total pwnage that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Oh and Dragon Capture Jar FTW You can't be serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDKMRV Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 For the dragons that you can special summon due to its effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 DCJ is a bad card. >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Just because a few broken cards exist for a given Type doesn't mean that the Type as a whole is anything to write home about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 This card is not ban worthy. It is instantly limit worthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. That's the spirit, buddy! Let's combine! FINAL... FUSION!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted September 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 DCJ is a bad card. >.> Actually, I used to use one in my old Dragon deck. Let me guess, you're thinking "FTW!? What was he thinking?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 DCJ is a bad card. >.> Actually' date=' I used to use one in my old Dragon deck. Let me guess, you're thinking "FTW!? What was he thinking?"[/quote'] No, "FTW" was not the acronym that popped into my head. There is nothing "For The Win" about running Dragon Capture Jar in *any* deck. This card is not ban worthy. It is instantly limit worthy. LOL DECENT THEEM SUPART LIMIT NAO NAO NAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted September 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 DCJ is a bad card. >.> Actually' date=' I used to use one in my old Dragon deck. Let me guess, you're thinking "FTW!? What was he thinking?"[/quote'] No, "FTW" was not the acronym that popped into my head. There is nothing "For The Win" about running Dragon Capture Jar in *any* deck. lol, oops. It was supposed to say "WTF". But, it has actually helped me win several duels. My opponent would attack a Dragon of mine, barely being able to kill it, then I would use DCJ and Unity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 DCJ is a bad card. >.> Actually' date=' I used to use one in my old Dragon deck. Let me guess, you're thinking "FTW!? What was he thinking?"[/quote'] No, "FTW" was not the acronym that popped into my head. There is nothing "For The Win" about running Dragon Capture Jar in *any* deck. lol, oops. It was supposed to say "WTF". But, it has actually helped me win several duels. My opponent would attack a Dragon of mine, barely being able to kill it, then I would use DCJ and Unity. This is a terrible strategy. Rather than rely on a 3+ card combo that relies on you having multiple monsters on the field and whose only effect is to negate an attack and inflict Life Point damage, you may as well use Magic Cylinder or Shrink. At least those wouldn't leave you unable to declare an attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Treeborn Frog is also WATER. Look how much stronger it managed to make Aquas, eh? And I suppose Red Archfiend Dragon is now Pyro support on the grounds that it's FIRE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Treeborn Frog is also WATER. Look how much stronger it managed to make Aquas, eh? And I suppose Red Archfiend Dragon is now Pyro support on the grounds that it's FIRE? Red Archfiend Dragon is DARK, IIRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Treeborn Frog is also WATER. Look how much stronger it managed to make Aquas, eh? And I suppose Red Archfiend Dragon is now Pyro support on the grounds that it's FIRE? Red Archfiend Dragon is DARK, IIRC. Well, Black Rose Dragon is FIRE. I don't see him helping out Pyro's either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Treeborn Frog is also WATER. Look how much stronger it managed to make Aquas, eh? And I suppose Red Archfiend Dragon is now Pyro support on the grounds that it's FIRE? Red Archfiend Dragon is DARK, IIRC. Well, Black Rose Dragon is FIRE. I don't see him helping out Pyro's either. But it supported Plants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I think it should be banned. It's verey easy to summon and the effect is wicked but to powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 I think it should be banned. It's verey easy to summon and the effect is wicked but to powerful. It will not get banned. Just because it is God in Dragon form, it doesnt mean it will get banned. And everyone else who uses counterability as an argument for banning or Limiting a given card is bad at the game. Counterablility doesnt affect banworthiness. It could by all means affect the effectiveness of the card(s) but it will not change the fact of banworthiness. This card aint banworthy. Maybe if it could say, get a copy of itself out and so on. That may be a good cause for banning or Limiting it but that's not the case now is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Balanced support for a poor type. If it was dealing with Machines or Zombies or Warriors' date=' then we might have something for banning it (but only a little something). As it stands, REDRUM is nothing more then God in Dragon form, and nothing less than good themed support.[/quote'] The meta says hi. The meta says Im not a dragon buy some glasses DAD and JD aren't Dragons? Just because a handful of good cards of a specific Type exist doesn't mean that that Type is good - especially if those cards aren't designed to interact with said Type. Fiber Jar is Plant.Sinister Serpent is Reptile.Tribe-Infecting Virus is Aqua. That doesn't mean that Plants, Reptiles, and Aquas are good Types. What about Crossroads of Chaos? Also, Aquas will probably get stronger since it seems the Fifth D is Water. Treeborn Frog is also WATER. Look how much stronger it managed to make Aquas, eh? And I suppose Red Archfiend Dragon is now Pyro support on the grounds that it's FIRE? Red Archfiend Dragon is DARK, IIRC. Well, Black Rose Dragon is FIRE. I don't see him helping out Pyro's either. But it supported Plants. Black rose is good outside of plants, as DAD is good outside dragon decks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predator_1 Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 This card is like the "The Creator" but only 1 tribute and the ability to summon from hand too.....Overpowered, it should be "...only Special Summoned by Tributing 3 Dragon-Type monster....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 This card is like the "The Creator" but only 1 tribute and the ability to summon from hand too.....Overpowered' date=' it should be "...only Special Summoned by Tributing 3 Dragon-Type monster....."[/quote'] Weak... The Creator has it's Incarnate who can be searched with RotA and can bring back any monster in the grave while REDMD can only revive dragons so it's kinda fair he has to discard one for it's effect. They both can be sp summon if they are RFG (which is easier in the OCG with arms hole->ddr). Almost the same for the dark creator so i won't bother talking about him. Swarming big monsters is impressive but it doesn't win games unless they have good effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexh Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 i,m not sure it might be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.