Docomodake Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 SPAM. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 What can I say to this.. .......>=| I HATE SPAM!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I had this idea once, XD. Think I'm gonna go back to it, actually. Outdated OCG, mon ami. Other than that... SpamOCG Error: Correct OCG is Special Summon 1 "Spam Token" (Fiend-Type/DARK/Level 1/ATK 0/DEF 0) to your opponent's field in Defense Position. When a Spam Token is destroyed, Special Summon 2 "Extra-Spam Tokens" (Fiend-Type/DARK/Level 1/ATK 0/DEF 0) in Defense Position to your opponent's field in Defense Position. When your opponent declares an attack, if they control a Spam Token or an Extra-Spam Token, negate the attack and destroy 1 Spam Token or Extra-Spam Token your opponent controls.Ruling Error: You can't attack your own monsters, so you'd want to say, When your opponent declares an attack, if they control a Spam Token, negate the attack and destroy 1 Spam Token your opponent controls.. Also, building on that, Spam Tokens would continually reproduce, eventually stopping your opponent's field entirely. Because there's no way to eradicate them, the card is instantly banworthy.Type Error: This card should be a Normal Trap Card. Spam Castle:Type Error: This card should be a Normal Spell Card.OCG Error: Correct OCG is Inflict 500 damage to your opponent for all Spam Tokens and Extra-Spam Tokens on the field. Spam Control! Rollout!OCG Error: Correct OCG is •Heads: Remove all Spam Tokens and Extra-Spam tokens from the field. •Tails: Destroy this card.Type Error: This card should be a Normal Spell Card. No more for now. Spam is absolutely broken, but other than that, great originality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.