Thomas Wolf Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 This sucks! Maybe cause I don't have him. But Light and Darkness Dragon is too good to have three. He's too easy to summon and hard to take out. I mean, I know you can chain but still, it's cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 The topic creator hasn't played Yu-Gi-Oh! during the past seven months, and doesn't understand proper banlist construction theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 When you compare it to DAD and JD, it's nothing.(kinda)Still a pain to face, but if it beats you every time because you can't stop it, you're a bad player >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Wolf Posted September 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 The topic creator hasn't played Yu-Gi-Oh! during the past seven months' date=' and doesn't understand proper banlist construction theory.[/quote'] Dude, I am not trying to insult you. But you really piss me off when you talk like you're supprioir to me, cause you're not. I understand that have to take cards off the list. I can still complain about it. It's not my fault I just noticed he's off.' pid='1084326' dateline='1220762673']When you compare it to DAD and JD' date=' it's nothing.(kinda)Still a pain to face, but if it beats you every time because you can't stop it, you're a bad player >>[/quote'] It aint that he beats me every time. It's only when they come one right after another that I can't seem to come back. That's why I'm complaining about three. But yeah, I see what you're saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 If you honestly think that LADD is going to break the meta in this format, then you haven't played in the past seven months. If you honestly think that LADD should remain at 2, then you don't understand proper banlist construction theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Wolf Posted September 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 If you honestly think that LADD is going to break the meta in this format' date=' then you haven't played in the past seven months. If you honestly think that LADD should remain at 2, then you don't understand proper banlist construction theory.[/quote'] Look, I'm not trying to get into a debate. My whole point was, I don't like LADD being at three, than you come on and tell me what I know and what I don't know and it pisses me off the way you're saying things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Look' date=' I'm not trying to get into a debate. My whole point was, I don't like LADD being at three, than you come on and tell me what I know and what I don't know and it pisses me off the way you're saying things.[/quote'] Obviously, you must have some reason for not liking LaDD at 3. Please, for the benefit of the classroom, tell us all why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Lets face it LaDD is a bad anti-meta card. If you cannot kill it then you should just lrn2play. It is a decent card but hardly banwothy. On a side note however: LaDD nearly kills by Yubel deck, slowing it down and putting all my Yubel in trouble tremendously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Oh please. LaDD is fine at 3. I dont see what the big deal is. It can get run over by plenty of things and I'm not using the whole counterablility as balance thing but regardless it's still pretty balanced. You cant Special Summon it and you give up your Normal Summon just to play it and you basically give up your card effect using privileges. Im actually thinking of using it as PoC food to help in OTK's. It shuts down chainable cards and well basically anything. I'm gonna try this out and see how it works. It also takes skill to use properly and its one of those cards that cant go in just any deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 It makes my friends and I, who have about 9 of them, a lot of money when they go from being $2 to being $8-10 :D [/sar] Don't see why it should have ever been at two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 This sucks! Maybe cause I don't have him. But Light and Darkness Dragon is too good to have three. He's too easy to summon and hard to take out. I mean' date=' I know you can chain but still, it's cheap.[/quote'] Stopped reading there. Anyone who says LADD is as easy to summon as, say, BLS-EotE, deserves to be laughed at and quartered. + No, I'm not goin' to say, "hung up"... + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Give us a reason why LADD shouldn't be at 3 or don't post at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 The topic creator hasn't played Yu-Gi-Oh! during the past seven months' date=' and doesn't understand proper banlist construction theory.[/quote'] Dude, I am not trying to insult you. But you really piss me off when you talk like you're supprioir to me, cause you're not. As long as this is the TCG section, he is. You trying to claim that LaDD is too good to have at 3, too easy to summon and cheap proves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Considering that he's a two-tribute monster that can't be Special Summoned, the only harder monsters to summon would be Wicked Gods or certain Nomi/Semi-Nomi monsters like Gate Guardian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.