improved deck

[kidchaor]

the last list was unreadable because my computor was being an idiot but this is going to work this time

 

main: 50 extra: 5

 

monsters: 25

 

1 noisy gnat

1 the creator

1 magna drago

1 axe raider

2 penguin soldier

1 tune warrior

1 frequency magician

1 chaos command magician

1 mask of darkness

1 des koala

1 junk synchron

1 exiled force

1 zure, knight of dark world

1 kuriboh

1 destiny hero-dasher

2 guardian sphinx

1 jutte fighter

1 gene-warped warwolf

1 copycat

1 D.D. scout plane

1 speed warrior

1 the tricky

1 spear cretin

 

trap: 12

1 miniaturize

2 birthright

1 magic cylinder

2 shadow spell

1 limit reverse

1 ceasefire

1 soul rope

1 trap hole

1 remote revenge

1 scrap-iron scarecrow

 

spell: 13

1 monster reborn

1 synchro boost

2 monster reincarnation

2 mage power

1 symbols of duty

1 level tuning

1 swords of revealing light

1 synchronized realm

1 restructor revolution

1 synchro blast wave

1 D.D. capsule

 

extra: 5

1 junk warrior

1 gaia knight, the force of earth

1 colossal fighter

1 stardust dragon

1 red dragon archfiend

 

*note* main deck original # is 51. i removed 1 mask of darkness in order to post this deck online. and no the extra deck does not count toward the limit of the deck.

[Tickle Me Emo]

okay first step, remove the vaillas.

[Zetsumei75]

Second step, scrap this deck, then build a good deck.

[Sixty]

Third step, donate to my medical bill, as my eyes are bleeding.

[Guest Star]

This Deck Fails.

 

Sorry, I was acting like Legacy of Stardust for a second there.

 

Ok, if this is the improved Deck, the original version must have been really bad.

 

The Deck is really random.

 

I don't even know what some of the cards do, but I can tell that this is not a good Deck.

 

Why are you using Axe Raider and Zure, Knight of Dark World?

[kidchaor]

' pid='1056500' dateline='1220247149']

This Deck Fails.

 

Sorry' date=' I was acting like Legacy of Stardust for a second there.

 

Ok, if this is the improved Deck, the original version must have been really bad.

 

The Deck is really random.

 

I don't even know what some of the cards do, but I can tell that this is not a good Deck.

 

Why are you using Axe Raider and Zure, Knight of Dark World?

[/quote']

 

because it is my deck and i can do whatever i want with it.

[Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP]

Bad deck. Too much randomness

[~ Chidori-Kun]

AHH!!!

[kidchaor]

NEW RULE

 

do not talk bad about my deck because i get the idea that your are just here to scam people to making them feel bad about their deck. so from now on no badtalking about my deck!

[JesusofChaos™]

Warning: Backseat Moderating, YOU ARE NOT A MOD

[kidchaor]

Warning: Backseat Moderating' date=' YOU ARE NOT A MOD

[/quote']

 

i am only mad because people always riicule my deck and always saying that my deck sucks so that's why i made this rule up to prevent further embarrassment that was caused by people who make a mockery of my deck. it is only to prevent even more pain and suffering. i enjoy this site and i hate to leave because people talk badly about my deck, about my card creations, and my abilities as a duelist.

[snake101]

man i wish i could reach through the computer and smack you up side the head. anyway now that i got that out of the way explain how you plan on winning with this deck

[Zetsumei75]

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that, when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.

 

Hooray for the rule basically saying we can say anything we want about the deck!

 

Now to help you out a bit. This deck is too random to be competitive, pick a theme and build a deck around it. If you're on a budget, go with Gadgets or Batteryman.

[kidchaor]

this deck is used in the purpose of bringing out synchro monsters. while my guardian sphinx emties the field of my opponents monsters and my creator reserecting monsters i can focus on summoning my big synchros like red dragon archfiend and stardust dragon and destroy my opponent with barrages of attacks and with stardust's ability if my opponent uses trap hole or divine wrath i can sacrifice stardust to keep my sphinx and creator safe while i empty out his field of monsters and wage a direct assault on his life points and win the game.

---

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that' date=' when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.

 

Hooray for the rule basically saying we can say anything we want about the deck!

 

Now to help you out a bit. This deck is too random to be competitive, pick a theme and build a deck around it. If you're on a budget, go with Gadgets or Batteryman.

[/quote']

 

i did not say anything about not accepting constructive criticism or suggestions. i said i do not want any bad talk about my deck or my abilities as a duelist.

 

one more thing i do not have the cards to make a themed deck. i have too many missing cards and a deck is supose to tell people who you are.

[Benraino]

i did not say anything about not accepting constructive criticism or suggestions. i said i do not want any bad talk about my deck or my abilities as a duelist.

 

Oh, hi there conradiction.

 

By the way, you can buy most Batterymen stuff pretty cheaply, because most of it is commons. It is a great budget deck.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Holy pile of random Batman!

 

If I may quote myself:

 

"Why are you running ? You're aware Gene Warped Warwolf has more attack, right? And when Gene Warped Warwolf starts looking like a good idea in your deck, you know you ****ed up somewhere."

[kidchaor]

This Deck sucks horribly like you.

 

(I'm trying to get banned so I have to spam.)

 

if you are trying to be banned can you do it outside my thread. i do not appreciate it if someone who wants to get banned and decuded to do it on my thread.

[Tekken Ham]

I'm the nicer member on Gaia, so I'll try and help here too.

 

You're profile says that you are 17, good. That means you should be mature enough to understand me. FYI, I'm 14, so immature comments will look really stupid.

 

because it is my deck and i can do whatever i want with it.

 

He asked why you were running bad monsters. Sure it's your deck' date=' but to make it better you can take out those monsters and put in better ones to fit your theme or improve your win rate. This was constructive criticism and you retorted rudely. Star tried to help, and you were rude and hostile.

 

NEW RULE

 

do not talk bad about my deck because i get the idea that your are just here to scam people to making them feel bad about their deck. so from now on no badtalking about my deck!

 

This is bad, you are minimodding and breaking a rule by making up your own rule. There were harsh comments that weren't really criticism, but they didn't pass the criteria for flaming in this forum, so this is uncalled for and against the rules. Only in Clubs, Shops, or RPs are you allowed to make rules for your thread, but even then, the main board rules override them at times.

 

Warning: Backseat Moderating' date=' YOU ARE NOT A MOD

[/quote']

 

i am only mad because people always riicule my deck and always saying that my deck sucks so that's why i made this rule up to prevent further embarrassment that was caused by people who make a mockery of my deck. it is only to prevent even more pain and suffering. i enjoy this site and i hate to leave because people talk badly about my deck, about my card creations, and my abilities as a duelist.

 

Maybe if you made a not-so-random deck with a theme people wouldn't be hostile. This forum is against scrubs who spam with decks like this. And this is like spam so we might come off as a tad hostile and pretty mean, but we're so used to spammy scrubs that post decks like this that it's second nature. This forum is very open to new and innovative ideas even if some of them don't work, but we don't like random, theme less decks.

 

You broke a rule and a mod reprimanded you so JoC had perfect justification, but you retorted because people "riiculed" your deck because it seems like spam and it is our second nature.

 

Ugh, big quote, I'll type in the quote to save space and me some trouble.

this deck is used in the purpose of bringing out synchro monsters. while my guardian sphinx emties the field of my opponents monsters and my creator reserecting monsters i can focus on summoning my big synchros like red dragon archfiend and stardust dragon and destroy my opponent with barrages of attacks and with stardust's ability if my opponent uses trap hole or divine wrath i can sacrifice stardust to keep my sphinx and creator safe while i empty out his field of monsters and wage a direct assault on his life points and win the game.

 

So basically' date=' you're using an inconsistent Synchro beatdown. In order to make a good deck you need consistency and more stuff and blah blah blah. I don't want to explain how to make a good deck. However, I have an article by Benraino on how to construct a good deck. PM me if you want it. You're deck is random and theme less because it is inconsistent and the theme isn't really a theme. You are explaining the Win Condition. The theme is stuff such as GB, DaD, LS, Monarchs, Batterys, Heroes, Little City, Big City, Synchro, Tele-Sync, etc.[/b']

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that' date=' when you post your d eck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.

 

Hooray for the rule basically saying we can say anything we want about the deck!

 

Now to help you out a bit. This deck is too random to be competitive, pick a theme and build a deck around it. If you're on a budget, go with Gadgets or Batteryman.

[/quote']

 

i did not say anything about not accepting constructive criticism or suggestions. i said i do not want any bad talk about my deck or my abilities as a duelist.

 

However you could not accept the criticism given by Star. And you can't control the minds of people. Stalin tried, and even though it was a good system, he utterly failed due to human nature. So, suck up the tough comments and ignore them, unless they are flaming. If they are, report them using the beautiful "Report" button at the bottom of the offending post.

 

one more thing i do not have the cards to make a themed deck. i have too many missing cards and a deck is supose to tell people who you are.

Ugh, too much anime? A themed deck does not need many cards, just the ones needed for the deck. And a deck isn't "supose" to tell someone about you. It should be used for competitions and winning by using a good or innovative strategy.

 

 

And Star was being a scrub to get banned because he's too stupid to ask for it.

 

I hope you read this and don't skip this or I will become hostile, as I tried to help you understand everybody's comments.

[kidchaor]

I'm the nicer member on Gaia' date=' so I'll try and help here too.

 

You're profile says that you are 17, good. That means you should be mature enough to understand me. FYI, I'm 14, so immature comments will look really stupid.

 

because it is my deck and i can do whatever i want with it.

 

He asked why you were running bad monsters. Sure it's your deck, but to make it better you can take out those monsters and put in better ones to fit your theme or improve your win rate. This was constructive criticism and you retorted rudely. Star tried to help, and you were rude and hostile.

 

NEW RULE

 

do not talk bad about my deck because i get the idea that your are just here to scam people to making them feel bad about their deck. so from now on no badtalking about my deck!

 

This is bad' date=' you are minimodding and breaking a rule by making up your own rule. There were harsh comments that weren't really criticism, but they didn't pass the criteria for flaming in this forum, so this is uncalled for and against the rules. Only in Clubs, Shops, or RPs are you allowed to make rules for your thread, but even then, the main board rules override them at times.

 

Warning: Backseat Moderating' date=' YOU ARE NOT A MOD

[/quote']

 

i am only mad because people always riicule my deck and always saying that my deck sucks so that's why i made this rule up to prevent further embarrassment that was caused by people who make a mockery of my deck. it is only to prevent even more pain and suffering. i enjoy this site and i hate to leave because people talk badly about my deck, about my card creations, and my abilities as a duelist.

 

Maybe if you made a not-so-random deck with a theme people wouldn't be hostile. This forum is against scrubs who spam with decks like this. And this is like spam so we might come off as a tad hostile and pretty mean, but we're so used to spammy scrubs that post decks like this that it's second nature. This forum is very open to new and innovative ideas even if some of them don't work, but we don't like random, theme less decks.

 

You broke a rule and a mod reprimanded you so JoC had perfect justification, but you retorted because people "riiculed" your deck because it seems like spam and it is our second nature.

 

Ugh, big quote, I'll type in the quote to save space and me some trouble.

this deck is used in the purpose of bringing out synchro monsters. while my guardian sphinx emties the field of my opponents monsters and my creator reserecting monsters i can focus on summoning my big synchros like red dragon archfiend and stardust dragon and destroy my opponent with barrages of attacks and with stardust's ability if my opponent uses trap hole or divine wrath i can sacrifice stardust to keep my sphinx and creator safe while i empty out his field of monsters and wage a direct assault on his life points and win the game.

 

So basically' date=' you're using an inconsistent Synchro beatdown. In order to make a good deck you need consistency and more stuff and blah blah blah. I don't want to explain how to make a good deck. However, I have an article by Benraino on how to construct a good deck. PM me if you want it. You're deck is random and theme less because it is inconsistent and the theme isn't really a theme. You are explaining the Win Condition. The theme is stuff such as GB, DaD, LS, Monarchs, Batterys, Heroes, Little City, Big City, Synchro, Tele-Sync, etc.[/b']

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that' date=' when you post your d eck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.

 

Hooray for the rule basically saying we can say anything we want about the deck!

 

Now to help you out a bit. This deck is too random to be competitive, pick a theme and build a deck around it. If you're on a budget, go with Gadgets or Batteryman.

[/quote']

 

i did not say anything about not accepting constructive criticism or suggestions. i said i do not want any bad talk about my deck or my abilities as a duelist.

 

However you could not accept the criticism given by Star. And you can't control the minds of people. Stalin tried, and even though it was a good system, he utterly failed due to human nature. So, suck up the tough comments and ignore them, unless they are flaming. If they are, report them using the beautiful "Report" button at the bottom of the offending post.

 

one more thing i do not have the cards to make a themed deck. i have too many missing cards and a deck is supose to tell people who you are.

Ugh, too much anime? A themed deck does not need many cards, just the ones needed for the deck. And a deck isn't "supose" to tell someone about you. It should be used for competitions and winning by using a good or innovative strategy.

 

 

And Star was being a scrub to get banned because he's too stupid to ask for it.

 

I hope you read this and don't skip this or I will become hostile, as I tried to help you understand everybody's comments.

 

i only got a few things to say.

1 your wrong a deck always say what kind of duelist you are.

2 the deck is not random. i set everything up not by them but by strategy.

3 i don't have to follow the themes of decks. like i said it's my deck not anybody else's.

and finally a good duelist does not make a deck that mimics someone from the show. dimitri tried that but all it ended was defeat. i like this deck and i don't like people saying that it is horrible or random.