Total Control (with Monarchs)

[Ultimajk]

Awesome deck. I can feel my own decks loosing as i write this lol.

[Necrophia]

Stop reading books' date=' because clearly your sarcasm is just irritating, and if anything makes me want to disagree with you more. Of course based on your first paragraph I don't see you stopping anytime soon so oh well.

 

Do you hear me arguing? Yes its extremely boring and repetitive. Deal with it. This is a deck forum. Decks are made to play the game with, and to win or have fun. If this wins for him thats all that matters. If he has fun while playing, all the better. If he posted and said "this deck is no fun :( entertain me", then go ahead and make your fixes.

 

In this kind of deck marauding is useless. If you wish to beleive otherwise, clearly I can't stop you.

 

Extermination is a spell speed one, you cannot chain it to a mirror force or a nightmare wheel(lol?). If you were trying to say that mirror force is'nt chainable to it, true but thats still just one card, and typically you'll end up ROD'd waboku ect. ect. Usually you end up wasting a card to have them trigger their effect earlier than intended.

 

And yes I am a geek, as are you for caring oh so much that someone copied a deck from a childrens card game from the internet. I can talk down to you and don't feel guilty for doing so. You are arrogant, lose your points within your own abysmal style of arguement, and you may believe that you are superior but you are quite incorrect. I've had more compelling arguements with star trainer, as atleast I can understand what exactly the point of his rambling is.

 

And I'll take my praise all at once. Thanks.

[/quote']

 

What do you mean "Stop reading books"? I'll stop as soon as you start. Then we'll be equals! I'm not sure if you have or have not noticed, but sarcasm is supposed to be irritating, and so far you've proven quite pertuberable to my sarcastic TEXT. This is barely an argument, as you're barely an opponent, especially considering this is on the internet on a Yugioh Card Maker site. Make it out as you will, but I don't stop, and won't stop.

 

Anyway, dueling is more about fun than competitiveness, but competitiveness can be fun, and with my own experiences and personal convictions on which cards I use and believe to be usable, I will give him advice, the likes of which with you seem to have an ENORMOUS problem! Oh dear, I think I'm beginning to quiver! Put up your dukes! I'm feeling insecure and I have to threaten you with false and violent pretenses!

 

Haha, anyway, enough of that, yeah Marauding's Great - Chop Chop, hurry up, move on, shall we?

 

You know, you're right about Nobleman of Extermination! I mean, Mirror Force IS only ONE card, right? But Sakuretsu makes 2, or 3! And so does Torrential. And Sometimes ROD can't be used when there are no face-up monsters on the field!

 

Anyway, aside from your OH-SO convincing argument, I have to say, I'm kinda pinning you!

 

And yes, YOU are a geek, I, on the other hand, am not. Geek is different than hobbiest. A hobbiest likes things as a hobbie, a GEEK, on the other hand, likes hobbies and takes them to a whole new stage. Anime nerds, for example, are an entirely good example. They watch naruto and immediately strive to be the 10th Hokage of the Hidden Shadow Village or whatever crap like that. It's all the same, and geeks are easily influenced.

 

Anyway, I'm seriously not convinced that you don't find me superior, because you actually do, naturally, I make other feel inferior because I condescend. And I'm absolutely sure you've had GREAT times with Star*Trainer and you two sure must be the BEST of friends! I mean, seriously! Considering this isn't an argument, rather a mocking (me mocking you) I couldn't care less about your personal details. You'd say ANYTHING to fluster me, but I'm rather inpertuberable when it comes to text. You see, I'm not a kid anymore, and my emotions are thus more stable than most others. It may take you a BIT more development and further progression through life in order to actually not get offended by text, or take it to a whole new level as some OMEGA NEVER-ENDING ARGUMENT OF DOOM.

 

You can't understand what I'm arguing about because either you'r dumb, or I'm not arguing. I cloud people's eyes and emotions with darkasm! It's dark sarcasm! BEWARE IT!

 

Soo... GIMME A BREAK - GIMME A BREAK - BREAK ME UP A PIECE O' DAT KIT KAT BAR!

 

Oh, this isn't praise kid, sorry. Did my darcasm fluster you THAT much? You must be confused!

 

Begone Knave! Haha, get it?

[chaoserver]

You state opinion. A mentally impaired clown whom only pleasures come from relations with a cow can think he's superior and wise compared to a man who has worked his way through college, and has a job that pays a million dollars a year. Im saying sto preading books because you say that research states sarcasm is persuasive, when all it does is persuade others to dislike you.

 

Sure dueling may be more about fun to you, but some people get fun out of winning. Sure you might enjoy losing every march, exterminating their ROD's the blow up in your face. Sure you may enjoy playing a marauding captain and having their cyber dragon and hydroggedon kill you next turn, have fun with that.

 

You clearly are insecure as you use sarcasm, to make your points seem so obvious, and others seem so frail, but Im afraid in my eyes you fail. I do and always will have a problem with arrogance. And yes, I too am guilty of this, but more righteously than yourself.

 

Edit: Christ you added more crap? I may strive to be the tenth Hokage but it's only because I believe it! And seeing as your sentences are perpetual sarcasm, you should be used to recognizing it in others writing.

 

I am not an opponent as this quarrel is over and I have won. Believe what you will in your deluded mind state but Im sure the general populus of the site will agree, though no doubt it will not sway your arrogance.

[darkguy00000]

What do you mean "Stop reading books"? I'll stop as soon as you start. Then we'll be equals! I'm not sure if you have or have not noticed' date=' but sarcasm is supposed to be irritating, and so far you've proven quite pertuberable to my sarcastic TEXT. This is barely an argument, as you're barely an opponent, especially considering this is on the internet on a Yugioh Card Maker site. Make it out as you will, but I don't stop, and won't stop.

 

[i']I take this as a message meaning you ARE spamming and will continue to do so, unabashed, in future times. More flaming, too.[/i]

 

Anyway, dueling is more about fun than competitiveness, but competitiveness can be fun, and with my own experiences and personal convictions on which cards I use and believe to be usable, I will give him advice, the likes of which with you seem to have an ENORMOUS problem! Oh dear, I think I'm beginning to quiver! Put up your dukes! I'm feeling insecure and I have to threaten you with false and violent pretenses!

 

Haha, anyway, enough of that, yeah Marauding's Great - Chop Chop, hurry up, move on, shall we?

 

Are you even listening to us, or supplying the conversation from somewhere inside the twisted, obviously traumatized mind of yours? We give you reasons and yet you ignore us and keep returning to a point I've nullified before.

 

You know, you're right about Nobleman of Extermination! I mean, Mirror Force IS only ONE card, right? But Sakuretsu makes 2, or 3! And so does Torrential. And Sometimes ROD can't be used when there are no face-up monsters on the field!

 

Anyway, aside from your OH-SO convincing argument, I have to say, I'm kinda pinning you!

 

And yes, YOU are a geek, I, on the other hand, am not. Geek is different than hobbiest. A hobbiest likes things as a hobbie, a GEEK, on the other hand, likes hobbies and takes them to a whole new stage. Anime nerds, for example, are an entirely good example. They watch naruto and immediately strive to be the 10th Hokage of the Hidden Shadow Village or whatever crap like that. It's all the same, and geeks are easily influenced.

 

 

Oh, man. This little paragraph is dying to be compared to religious fanatics. Nerds who wish to be the 10th Hokage KNOW that it doesn't exist, it's called "pretending" and you need this thing called an "imagination".

 

Anyway, I'm seriously not convinced that you don't find me superior, because you actually do, naturally, I make other feel inferior because I condescend. And I'm absolutely sure you've had GREAT times with Star*Trainer and you two sure must be the BEST of friends! I mean, seriously! Considering this isn't an argument, rather a mocking (me mocking you) I couldn't care less about your personal details. You'd say ANYTHING to fluster me, but I'm rather inpertuberable when it comes to text. You see, I'm not a kid anymore, and my emotions are thus more stable than most others. It may take you a BIT more development and further progression through life in order to actually not get offended by text, or take it to a whole new level as some OMEGA NEVER-ENDING ARGUMENT OF DOOM.

 

You can't understand what I'm arguing about because either you'r dumb, or I'm not arguing. I cloud people's eyes and emotions with darkasm! It's dark sarcasm! BEWARE IT!

 

Soo... GIMME A BREAK - GIMME A BREAK - BREAK ME UP A PIECE O' DAT KIT KAT BAR!

 

Oh, this isn't praise kid, sorry. Did my darcasm fluster you THAT much? You must be confused!

 

Begone Knave! Haha, get it?

 

Bolded, underlined, quoted and italic'd for emphasis, and then I've bolded in all the bubblings of a four year-old that's found the sugar bowl while mommy was having a lie-down. I'm serious, some of this post isn't even intelligible conversation. For all your "stable emotional", you're too busy quoting advertisements and calling people whom you are arguing with geeks because they like the card game that you are arguing about NOW to realise nobody is listening to your incoherent rambling because it's simply not relevant anymore.

 

Open your damn eyes and realise you can just stop this by simply stopping your incessant yap! I've already given my reasons for why Drain and Captain don't work here, so WHAT ARE YOU STILL DOING HERE!? And as for "Oh, he can just test it?" Then fine, but I'm telling him NOT to test it on the first trial, which is obviously what this deck IS! Or did that slip your oh-so-emotionally-stable mind?

 

This is useless, and you're starting to flame and spam, and I've got quotes of both. You try being civil to people and you get this kind of stuff.

[Necrophia]

What do you mean "Stop reading books"? I'll stop as soon as you start. Then we'll be equals! I'm not sure if you have or have not noticed' date=' but sarcasm is supposed to be irritating, and so far you've proven quite pertuberable to my sarcastic TEXT. This is barely an argument, as you're barely an opponent, especially considering this is on the internet on a Yugioh Card Maker site. Make it out as you will, but I don't stop, and won't stop.

 

[i']I take this as a message meaning you ARE spamming and will continue to do so, unabashed, in future times. More flaming, too.[/i]

 

Anyway, dueling is more about fun than competitiveness, but competitiveness can be fun, and with my own experiences and personal convictions on which cards I use and believe to be usable, I will give him advice, the likes of which with you seem to have an ENORMOUS problem! Oh dear, I think I'm beginning to quiver! Put up your dukes! I'm feeling insecure and I have to threaten you with false and violent pretenses!

 

Haha, anyway, enough of that, yeah Marauding's Great - Chop Chop, hurry up, move on, shall we?

 

Are you even listening to us, or supplying the conversation from somewhere inside the twisted, obviously traumatized mind of yours? We give you reasons and yet you ignore us and keep returning to a point I've nullified before.

 

You know, you're right about Nobleman of Extermination! I mean, Mirror Force IS only ONE card, right? But Sakuretsu makes 2, or 3! And so does Torrential. And Sometimes ROD can't be used when there are no face-up monsters on the field!

 

Anyway, aside from your OH-SO convincing argument, I have to say, I'm kinda pinning you!

 

And yes, YOU are a geek, I, on the other hand, am not. Geek is different than hobbiest. A hobbiest likes things as a hobbie, a GEEK, on the other hand, likes hobbies and takes them to a whole new stage. Anime nerds, for example, are an entirely good example. They watch naruto and immediately strive to be the 10th Hokage of the Hidden Shadow Village or whatever crap like that. It's all the same, and geeks are easily influenced.

 

 

Oh, man. This little paragraph is dying to be compared to religious fanatics. Nerds who wish to be the 10th Hokage KNOW that it doesn't exist, it's called "pretending" and you need this thing called an "imagination".

 

Anyway, I'm seriously not convinced that you don't find me superior, because you actually do, naturally, I make other feel inferior because I condescend. And I'm absolutely sure you've had GREAT times with Star*Trainer and you two sure must be the BEST of friends! I mean, seriously! Considering this isn't an argument, rather a mocking (me mocking you) I couldn't care less about your personal details. You'd say ANYTHING to fluster me, but I'm rather inpertuberable when it comes to text. You see, I'm not a kid anymore, and my emotions are thus more stable than most others. It may take you a BIT more development and further progression through life in order to actually not get offended by text, or take it to a whole new level as some OMEGA NEVER-ENDING ARGUMENT OF DOOM.

 

You can't understand what I'm arguing about because either you'r dumb, or I'm not arguing. I cloud people's eyes and emotions with darkasm! It's dark sarcasm! BEWARE IT!

 

Soo... GIMME A BREAK - GIMME A BREAK - BREAK ME UP A PIECE O' DAT KIT KAT BAR!

 

Oh, this isn't praise kid, sorry. Did my darcasm fluster you THAT much? You must be confused!

 

Begone Knave! Haha, get it?

 

Bolded, underlined, quoted and italic'd for emphasis, and then I've bolded in all the bubblings of a four year-old that's found the sugar bowl while mommy was having a lie-down. I'm serious, some of this post isn't even intelligible conversation. For all your "stable emotional", you're too busy quoting advertisements and calling people whom you are arguing with geeks because they like the card game that you are arguing about NOW to realise nobody is listening to your incoherent rambling because it's simply not relevant anymore.

 

Open your damn eyes and realise you can just stop this by simply stopping your incessant yap! I've already given my reasons for why Drain and Captain don't work here, so WHAT ARE YOU STILL DOING HERE!? And as for "Oh, he can just test it?" Then fine, but I'm telling him NOT to test it on the first trial, which is obviously what this deck IS! Or did that slip your oh-so-emotionally-stable mind?

 

This is useless, and you're starting to flame and spam, and I've got quotes of both. You try being civil to people and you get this kind of stuff.

 

Oh no! I think. . . I think I'm having a HEART ATTACK FROM ALL OF THE TRAUMA THAT I'VE HAD TO ENDURE OMG HELP! I think I'm seriously in need of some laser eye surgery, apparently my eyes need opening. I'm a 4-year-old, you caught me, and I love sugar.

 

Now, spamming is one thing, but flaming? I've not directly insulted anyone as of yet, which actually what the geeky term "flaming" refers to. And as far as I'm concerned, if I'm spamming, you're both as well, so let's skip to the bulk shall we kids?

 

Now, calling me a 4-year-old is rather directly insulting me and my inferiority complex over here! You know so much about my past "traumas" that I'm actually quite scared and I'm sweating behind my monitor which I have to shade down because when its too bright it reminds me of. . . of. . . oh I better not say!

 

I'm not ignoring anything that doesn't need to be ignored, I'm ignoring everything opinionated, because an argument is comprised of actual fact, and both of you are sending to me emotional dribble. I apologize again if my traumaticly affected and offensive text causes you any more harm. Your eyes must be so distraught!

 

I quote advertisements? How many? Oh. . . 1! That needs to be pluralized alright. Well, that's QUITE a prominent grammatical error if you ask me! I think having a little fun once in awhile couldn't hurt, or SHOULDN'T hurt anyway. It seems like the more I say the more you get offended. Dear me, I had better stop!

 

And my "rambling" isn't incoherent, it's actually quite coherent. You'd say ANYTHING to make it look like I'm confused and you're COMPLETELY aware of everything. Well, it's not that. . . It's somewhat the other way around. I've broken down both of your arguments and I've analyzed them. Now, you're the types of people where I can't just argue head-on, that isn't fun! It isn't tactful or strategic! Apparantly you're confusing me with someone else. You couldn't be more insecure. Especially because you're both attacking me.

 

You just DON'T listen! I SAID Gimme a break!

 

Now, what you see as relevant, and what I see as relevant are coming from two alternate and completely different perceptions. I see most of your conversation as emotional and opinionated (inaccurately) and I see most of mine apathetic and opinionated (accurately) because you see boys, you're not so hard to read, letting your anime emotions bleed through the monitor, while I, on the other hand, HAVE TRAUMATIC PROBLEMS THE LIKES OF WHICH CANNOT BE AMENDED WITH SIMPLE CONVERSATION.

 

Apparently if I had a traumatic mental condition, or had experienced a trauma in the past, you wouldn't so much as dare speak a word of negativity to me. If you would, why, that would be crass. Psychology would denote that everything your saying comes from a biased and spiteful point of view. The fact that you had so much time to gather your thoughts and focus on my style of text makes you think "Oh my gosh! I MUST be winning now because i said that shes incoherent lol!" No. You're actually mistaken, or attempting to mislead me. It's not working. You're so insecure that you have to make up things which you cannot prove. You have to protect yourself in huge redundant and vapid paragraphs embellished in fluff and lies that should help you move on with life and this argument. Does it mean THAT much to you?

 

Don't involve your ego so much that you think because you've finished your rantings that I'm to conclude. It isn't as easy as that. This isn't yap, again, you're drooling with repition. Nothing slipped my emotionally traumatized mind. He can test it. What the heck is up with "trials"? Is THAT how competitive everyone's becoming. Wow, wake up and smell the fun, the metagame is cold.

 

I don't know when you tried approaching me in a civil manner, considering you're always affronting me each time you do it. Seriously now, unless you can imput more tact than to repeatedly say that my argument is dribble, than you have to stop. You're trying to end it with a pitifully coated last-ditch effort. I'm very aware of what I'm seeing, I see it A LOT.

 

Now, you, the other one.

 

"You state opinion. A mentally impaired clown whom only pleasures come from relations with a cow can think he's superior and wise compared to a man who has worked his way through college, and has a job that pays a million dollars a year. Im saying sto preading books because you say that research states sarcasm is persuasive, when all it does is persuade others to dislike you."

 

Of course I state an opinion, that's why this ISN'T an argument. Although my opinions actually matter, since I think before I speak. Now, I'm going to let that misplaced "whom" slip, but I only hope you didn't mean that. And no, I didn't research anything about sarcasm, I've experienced by using it. It's persuading you, apparently. I can read it through your emotions.

 

"Sure dueling may be more about fun to you, but some people get fun out of winning. Sure you might enjoy losing every march, exterminating their ROD's the blow up in your face. Sure you may enjoy playing a marauding captain and having their cyber dragon and hydroggedon kill you next turn, have fun with that."

 

I get fun out of winning, that's a very obvious aspect of what's fun. Winning to me, involves winning with creativity, not by copying. Monarch Decks imitate one another. And stop being situational, it isn't helping you convince me that Marauding Captain isn't useful for summoning Terrorking to the field.

 

"You clearly are insecure as you use sarcasm, to make your points seem so obvious, and others seem so frail, but Im afraid in my eyes you fail. I do and always will have a problem with arrogance. And yes, I too am guilty of this, but more righteously than yourself."

 

No, actually, there are two reasons why people use sarcasm. One, the person is insecure. Two, the person likes the tone of it. I'm the latter type, unfortunately for your argument. In your eyes, I'm frail? But in your eyes all you can detect from me is my text. You're guilty of frailness which you just admitted, while I'm unable to be pertubed by text. Sorry.

 

"Edit: Christ you added more crap? I may strive to be the tenth Hokage but it's only because I believe it! And seeing as your sentences are perpetual sarcasm, you should be used to recognizing it in others writing."

 

Wow. I think I'll ignore that for your sake. My perpetual sarcasm is really working. You're using exlcamation points to state your emotions.

 

"I am not an opponent as this quarrel is over and I have won. Believe what you will in your deluded mind state but Im sure the general populus of the site will agree, though no doubt it will not sway your arrogance."

 

Oh no, you've done the ultimate gesture of insecurity. You've admitted to winning something that you know you clearly haven't. Oh man that's embarrassing. I think I'll save that. I don't see how you've won anything when clearly I've shaken you and you haven't shaken me at all. You know, we both know, that you haven't won, as the more you complain about your opponent's tactics, the more you're admitting defeat and exposing your emotions. My mind is absolutely deluded, that's why I'm smart? Oh wait, no I CAN'T be smart because I've LOST.

 

Here's a law: When there is One intelligent person on an internet site, and there are multiple idiots, the idiots will attack the intelligent person.

 

This law goes for basically anywhere and everywhere. Unfortunately, I'm the intelligent person in this case. There's no other way of going about this.

 

I think you're both drowning in self-righteousness.

[HORUS]

Necrophia: I DONT CARE THAT ITS NOT ORIGINAL OR THAT IT IS OVERUSED. SHUT UP. WHY ARE YOU STILL ARGUING?

 

if you post anything in this topic after this post, i will report you to Frunk.

 

 

 

ultimajk. :lol: your decks losing was funny.

 

havent seen you in a while either.

[HORUS]

Here's a law: When there is One intelligent person on an internet site' date=' and there are multiple idiots, the idiots will attack the intelligent person.

[/quote']

 

i think Chaos is probably the intelligent person. i mean, he's 27 years old. why are you arguing with chaos? youre not getting anywhere and you sure arent going to win. ive read your posts and they are childish and inconclusive, while chaos' are sensible and witty. just stop.

[Necrophia]

Good for you. You mean, by childish, sarcastic and offensive, because that's how I argue. It isn't childish, you're saying that to cover up what it really is. Inconclusive? Right. What is his? Conclusive? Are you just throwing out words? Throw in Abysmal and snide and irrevelant too.

 

Age isn't going to convince me that someone is smarter than me. You're just nagging because you know he's less harsh a critic than I am. Well, you really need to grow up and get over your petty and childish emotions, because like you're best friend here, they're bleeding through your text.

 

What you think, that your "friend" is the intelligent person, is based on an unsubstantiated and utterly biased opinion of an offended little boy. I'm arging with chaos because he's arguing with me, smart one, read up.

 

He isn't witty at all. Haha, wow. Do you know what WIT is, or is that another term you like to throw out in order to inflate yours or someone else's ego. I'll actually consider what you're saying when you're aware of what you're saying, because as of right now, it's not making much sense.

 

He hasn't come up with any witty remark, darkguy over there is trying is brains out and you're settling for chaos server? I have fun with him, it puts a big smile on my darcastic face!

 

There is a difference between a valid and actually sensible argument, where someone actually debates using sensibility and/or validity. This argument was not valid, therefore all I have to do is make everyone feel sad, and guess what? IT WORKED!

 

Now, if all you men are done getting your panties tied in a knot, I have music to make!

[HORUS]

stop posting here. i have already reported you to Frunk.

[Necrophia]

Oh. OOPS! I'm scurred!

[chaoserver]

Here's a law: When there is One intelligent person on an internet site' date=' and there are multiple idiots, the idiots will attack the intelligent person.

[/quote']

 

i think Chaos is probably the intelligent person. i mean, he's 27 years old. why are you arguing with chaos? youre not getting anywhere and you sure arent going to win. ive read your posts and they are childish and inconclusive, while chaos' are sensible and witty. just stop.

 

Welllll actually Im 16 XD.

 

To avoid further spam in your thread Im not going to respond to necro's other posts :shock:

[Necrophia]

You mean to further avoid my sarcasm.

 

Gotcha!

 

Yugioh! I love Yugioh!

[HORUS]

Welllll actually Im 16 XD.

 

 

you werent supposed to say that dude! :lol:

 

necrophia, we're trying to avoid your existence.

 

do not make another post in this thread, no matter what the post says.

 

i have already reported you to Frunk. if you continue, YCMaker will follow.

[Purple Dinosaur]

You totally need to include Raiza, Granmarg and Zaborg...Those Monarchs have the best effects...But it's good that you have Mobius and thestalos...I like the idea of that deck and the cards in it!!! Good Job!

[HORUS]

thanks. i have actually done some updating in the past few days, so i will make changes on the list soon.

[Frunk]

YCMaker will not need to follow, I've permantly banned many a user, Necrophia, and should you continue to post in this thread when you have been requested not to by the thread maker, then you, my friend, will have taken away the last inch of my patience.

[Sartorius]

Here's the current Monarch Order:

 

(The Best by FAR) Raiza > Thestalos > Mobius > Zaborg > Granmarg (The Worst by FAR)

 

Zaborg is overrated with Raiza in the format.

 

Run 3 Raiza and 3 Thestalos, and maybe 1 mobius and you should be fine.

[HORUS]

Thaaaaaank you Frunk.

 

 

yeah i am updating my deck as we speak. just remember though that its only temporary until i get the cards on the list that i need (ive been using proxies). so it will be a lot different. but its still massively awesome.

 

i dont and wont have Raiza. around where i live, Raizas are scarce, and everyone wants them. so dont be surprised if i dont have one on the list. :(

[Sartorius]

Zaborgs can replace raizas for now, but Thestalos is mandetory.

[Thunderhorse 16]

Its ok but hardly a monarch deck. You have only got 2 monarchs.

 

Add:

[x3] Raiza

[x2] Thestalos

[x1] Mobius or [x1] Zaborg

 

[x1] Brain Control

[x1] Soul Exchange

[x1] Pot of Avarice

 

Take out:

 

[x1] Monster reincarnation

[x1] Fissure

[x1] Ha Des

[x1] Granmarg

 

Good Luck

[Static]

This isn't a monarch deck, its a deck with two monarch's in it that lacks a theme. There should be Raizas x3 Mobius x2 and Thestalos x3. Get troopers for bazoo.

[HORUS]

i know. its not complete yet. i still need Mobius and another Thestalos.

[HORUS]

i made some edits and updated to the new list in preparation.

 

this deck (without Breaker and MOF, and with Snatch Steal and Fissure, though i didnt use them) got me to the finals of my local tournament. i rarely lose with this deck.

[HORUS]

Bump. :(

 

c'mon guys, i need some help.

[the Snakey Wolf Lord]

9/10