Red Ryu Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 In other news' date=' ban Royal Impregnable Fortress.[/quote'] Why ban it? It's the best thing to stop Dark Armed Dragon Decks. I've got an even better idea for stopping Dark Armed Dragon decks. It's a cunning plan that requires a great shift in general game strategy, but it is truly brilliant in its simplicity of execution. I call it "banning Dark Armed Dragon". I don't have time to explain the details, however. While it is, legal, we should have options to fight it. However, Fotress shouldn't be one of them due tot he loops. But until that day comes' date=' RIF should remain legal.[/quote'] Because of the infinite loops like with Quillbolt Hedgehog, it shouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 But until that day comes' date=' RIF should remain legal.[/quote'] Because of the infinite loops like with Quillbolt Hedgehog, it shouldn't. Like I said, ban it with DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 In other news' date=' ban Royal Impregnable Fortress.[/quote'] Why ban it? It's the best thing to stop Dark Armed Dragon Decks. I've got an even better idea for stopping Dark Armed Dragon decks. It's a cunning plan that requires a great shift in general game strategy, but it is truly brilliant in its simplicity of execution. I call it "banning Dark Armed Dragon". I don't have time to explain the details, however. But until that day comes, RIF should remain legal. You people have a tendency to use logic of the following structure: "We should do X to Card A instead of doing Z to Card A because, even though we want Y done to Card B, Y hasn't been done to Card B, and until Y is done to Card B it would be better to do X to Card A than to do Z to Card A?" This is false logic. If we have the ability to do X to Card A, then we have the ability to do Y to Card B. If we don't have the ability to do Y to Card B, then we don't have the ability to do X or Z to Card A anyhow - in fact, we don't have the ability to do anything. And, frankly, actually considering that such circumstances would result in any meaningful discussion is laughable, as the only option is Konami's format, since we can't make any changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 In other news' date=' ban Royal Impregnable Fortress.[/quote'] Why ban it? It's the best thing to stop Dark Armed Dragon Decks. I've got an even better idea for stopping Dark Armed Dragon decks. It's a cunning plan that requires a great shift in general game strategy, but it is truly brilliant in its simplicity of execution. I call it "banning Dark Armed Dragon". I don't have time to explain the details, however. But until that day comes, RIF should remain legal. You people have a tendency to use logic of the following structure: "We should do X to Card A instead of doing Z to Card A because, even though we want Y done to Card B, Y hasn't been done to Card B, and until Y is done to Card B it would be better to do X to Card A than to do Z to Card A?" This is false logic. If we have the ability to do X to Card A, then we have the ability to do Y to Card B. If we don't have the ability to do Y to Card B, then we don't have the ability to do X or Z to Card A anyhow - in fact, we don't have the ability to do anything. And, frankly, actually considering that such circumstances would result in any meaningful discussion is laughable, as the only option is Konami's format, since we can't make any changes. I....guess I understand, but RIF ruins DAD and strengthens Zombie. Yes, I believe it should be Banned, but it's also the best counter we got to DAD. Banning RIF would only make DAD stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 In other news' date=' ban Royal Impregnable Fortress.[/quote'] Why ban it? It's the best thing to stop Dark Armed Dragon Decks. I've got an even better idea for stopping Dark Armed Dragon decks. It's a cunning plan that requires a great shift in general game strategy, but it is truly brilliant in its simplicity of execution. I call it "banning Dark Armed Dragon". I don't have time to explain the details, however. But until that day comes, RIF should remain legal. You people have a tendency to use logic of the following structure: "We should do X to Card A instead of doing Z to Card A because, even though we want Y done to Card B, Y hasn't been done to Card B, and until Y is done to Card B it would be better to do X to Card A than to do Z to Card A?" This is false logic. If we have the ability to do X to Card A, then we have the ability to do Y to Card B. If we don't have the ability to do Y to Card B, then we don't have the ability to do X or Z to Card A anyhow - in fact, we don't have the ability to do anything. And, frankly, actually considering that such circumstances would result in any meaningful discussion is laughable, as the only option is Konami's format, since we can't make any changes. I....guess I understand, but RIF ruins DAD and strengthens Zombie. Yes, I believe it should be Banned, but it's also the best counter we got to DAD. Banning RIF would only make DAD stronger. If we have the ability to ban RIF, then we also have the ability to ban DAD, so what banning RIF would do to DAD is a moot point. If we don't have the ability to ban DAD, then we don't have the ability to ban RIF, and, n fact, we don't have the ability to make any changes to the banlist. Thus, the logical conclusion is that our best course of action is to do nothing, since our only course of action is to do nothing. However, declaring that our best action in every situation is to do nothing doesn't generate a very good discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 In other news' date=' ban Royal Impregnable Fortress.[/quote'] Why ban it? It's the best thing to stop Dark Armed Dragon Decks. I've got an even better idea for stopping Dark Armed Dragon decks. It's a cunning plan that requires a great shift in general game strategy, but it is truly brilliant in its simplicity of execution. I call it "banning Dark Armed Dragon". I don't have time to explain the details, however. But until that day comes, RIF should remain legal. You people have a tendency to use logic of the following structure: "We should do X to Card A instead of doing Z to Card A because, even though we want Y done to Card B, Y hasn't been done to Card B, and until Y is done to Card B it would be better to do X to Card A than to do Z to Card A?" This is false logic. If we have the ability to do X to Card A, then we have the ability to do Y to Card B. If we don't have the ability to do Y to Card B, then we don't have the ability to do X or Z to Card A anyhow - in fact, we don't have the ability to do anything. And, frankly, actually considering that such circumstances would result in any meaningful discussion is laughable, as the only option is Konami's format, since we can't make any changes. I....guess I understand, but RIF ruins DAD and strengthens Zombie. Yes, I believe it should be Banned, but it's also the best counter we got to DAD. Banning RIF would only make DAD stronger. If we have the ability to ban RIF, then we also have the ability to ban DAD, so what banning RIF would do to DAD is a moot point. If we don't have the ability to ban DAD, then we don't have the ability to ban RIF, and, n fact, we don't have the ability to make any changes to the banlist. Thus, the logical conclusion is that our best course of action is to do nothing, since our only course of action is to do nothing. However, declaring that our best action in every situation is to do nothing doesn't generate a very good discussion. Well, we got SDD and other cards, so I guess we can ban RIF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 true my deck got crapped up because of premature burial banning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabdueler318 Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 hay people how are yall doing? is there any one out there to show me how to update my profile and create it please thank you very much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 hay people how are yall doing? is there any one out there to show me how to update my profile and create it please thank you very much User CP(control panel) On the left side of the screen there is a section titled "edit profile". Oh and you might be posting in the wrong thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 hay people how are yall doing? is there any one out there to show me how to update my profile and create it please thank you very much Spam, but I'll be easy on you since you're new. I highly suggest you look at your rep now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.