Flame Dragon Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Good card. Best at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Good card. Extremely Broken at 3.Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Good card. Extremely Broken at 3.Fixed.Mind to say how it's broken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 22, 2008 Report Share Posted August 22, 2008 Good at 3, bad at any other number. Basically, RotA-esque, only the said Level 4 monster is Special Summoned instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2008 Good card. Extremely Broken at 3.Fixed.Mind to say how it's broken? We will start of simple -Easy Flood, even if they are only 800 Atk.-Minus Dead Cards for field advantage, especially now that we have a 4 drop cyber dragon.-No matter how you look at it, its a 0 or 1 for 1, UNLESS you use ojamagic, and than you get a +3. Some Combos -Ojamagic + Snipe Hunter, as i stated earlier, Mini Luck sac DAD.-Perfect Card for Exodia FTK (lol, could possibly make this deck top of tier 2.)-Gawd in Gigaplant OTK-Gawd in Magical explosion-Sacred crane becoming the new Disk commander. (Dont see it? o.O)-Monarch Food-Great Stratos engine-DDT And back to the basics -Searchable-Allureable-Spellcaster support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2008 ^I view broken as Cards that can create a huge advantage in very little play. Is it everyones view? Probably not. Also about using ban worthy cards, If there aren't banned, no matter how much they should be, they can still be used. I won't stop using them in examples just because they should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 22, 2008 Report Share Posted August 22, 2008 Good card. Extremely Broken at 3.Fixed.Mind to say how it's broken? We will start of simple -Easy Flood' date=' even if they are only 800 Atk.-Minus Dead Cards for field advantage, especially now that we have a 4 drop cyber dragon.-No matter how you look at it, its a 0 or 1 for 1, UNLESS you use ojamagic, and than you get a +3. Some Combos -Ojamagic + Snipe Hunter, as i stated earlier, Mini Luck sac DAD.-Perfect Card for Exodia FTK (lol, could possibly make this deck top of tier 2.)-Gawd in Gigaplant OTK-Gawd in Magical explosion-Sacred crane becoming the new Disk commander. (Dont see it? o.O)-Monarch Food-Great Stratos engine-DDT And back to the basics -Searchable-Allureable-Spellcaster support[/quote'] You don't seem to understand what the word "broken" means. Also, stop using banworthy cards in your arguments. Half the combos you listed involve banworthy cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Was great when I got to use it in video games especially this weird deck I made involving it, diamond dude and all the field nuking effects with weird cost I had...it will just destroy in many decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 ^I view broken as Cards that can create a huge advantage in very little play. This isn't written clearly enough for me to tell what you're saying. "in very little play"? Try again. Also about using ban worthy cards' date=' If there aren't banned, no matter how much they should be, they can still be used. I won't stop using them in examples just because they should be banned.[/quote'] There's a term for this style of argument. It's called "idiot logic". If card A is ridiculously abusable with card B, and card B deserves to be banned, then that does not imply that card A is broken. On a good list, DDT does not exist, since several of its key elements, such as Dimension Fusion and DMoC, do not exist. Therefore, nobody cares how abusable Prisma is in DDT, because DDT should not exist in the first place on a decent list. And arguing about where a card belongs on a sucky list is a waste of time, because if we admit that the list is sucky we may as well roll a four-sided die and subtract one from the result to determine how many copies in which to allow the card. Idiot Logic also dictates that both Gearfried the Iron Knight AND Butterfly Dagger - Elma should be banned, because either one is abusable with the other in a broken way. Granted, the difference between this example and examples like DDT is that Butterfly Dagger - Elma is already banned on Konami's list, but if you honestly think that Konami's list has any relevance whatsoever to banlist discussion, then you're too bloody sucky at this game for it to be worthy continuing this conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Well seeing how it is already 2 per deck, and wishes were made that it should be 3 per deck is pointless. As you guys always say, There is no card Good at 3 and bad at 2. I was simply stating how i feel about the card and the advantages it can create to game plays involving little to no play. A free 4 drop is a free 4 drop. It makes for cheap, banable advantages. It also creates the, "Ban this because this can support it" argument. Sooner or later it will be deemed broken, or problematic, just like snipe hunter was. My idea of broken, in simpler terms, is cards that creates advantages without skill. This card does just that. Perfect example of this card is the Diamond Dude example. With this card filling your deck with powerful spells you hope to gain the effect of like ODH and Final Destiny, would actually have a use. They no longer become, Dead Draws, but more Diamond Dude power, or even Poc power, to try again. This entire deck even without Dmoc or Dimension Fusion could still be self sustaining. This game is simply to easy to be "bad at" Isn't it just simpler to say, "I don't agree with your logic?" Or mabey. "I see things in another light." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringer Of The Apocalypse Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Want, must have now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.