legolover09 Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I remember the other one and how it stoped. Well i'm starting another one. Copied from old one: ~The Rules~ Each week, on Monday, I shall post 3 different themes - your job, as entrants (you will have to renew your entry each week with the starting of a new contest), is to select one of the three available themes and model a deck around it. Each theme will have a difficulty level, Easy, Medium, and Hard. These levels are to identify how hard it is to make a working deck around said theme. For example, a deck modeled around DAD would be a very easy theme, while a deck modeled around Shapesnatch would be very difficult. All entries must be in by Friday of each week, where judging will then occur and a winner will be decided upon on Saturday. Sunday shall be a break period. Anyone who wants to assist in judging may feel free to step forward and offer their assistance each week, but I will only take on one judge (adding to myself) per week, and I will only accept competent players as judges. ~The Judging~ The Judging will be solely based on the skill that went into the deck. Entrants who opted for a more difficult Deck Theme will be awarded more points than those who chose an easier theme, but only if the deck they submitted showed genuine thought and stuck to the theme! If someone went with the Shapesnatch theme and gave me a Macro Monarch deck that included 1 Shapesnatch, it would be disqualified for not even attempting to stick to the theme. Bear this important tidbit in mind - the Judging is NOT based on how GOOD the deck is, or how often it can win. The Judging is based on how well-thought the deck was. As long as you clearly tried to make a deck that could win, you will get points, so don't think the only way to win is by making a deck that can't lose. After all, I can't honestly expect a Shapesnatch deck to win very often, right? But you can sure as hell try. And that's what is considered. Judging will be: Creativeness: 10 pnts PossibleEffectiveness: 10 pnts PossibleEffort: 10 Pnts PossibleDifficulty: 5~15 pnt Bonus. ~The Rewards~ Each week, the winning Deck will receive 2 Reps and 50 Points. It's a small reward, but this is a weekly thing. Now then, with those rules out of the way, here are this week's themes! ~The Themes~ Esay: build a Lightsworn Deck with at least 1 of every lightsworn from light of destruction. Medium: Build a deck around Stardust Dragon. (it's medium because it's brand newish) Hard: build a deck around kuriboh and winged kuriboh (any lvl). you may have 3 different monsters with up to three of each with over 1000 attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I'll go with the furr balls 152 winged kuriboh lv103 grinder golem 1 sangan (this is almost a kuriboh)3 mask of darkness3 winged kuriboh3 kuriboh 83 the flute of summoning kuriboh2 allure of darkness1 monster reborn1 level limit area b1 swords of revealing light 171 torrential tribute1 gravity bind1 crush card virus1 ojama trio1 magic cylinder3 metal reflect slime3 threatning roar3 reckless greed3 solemn judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 For the "hard" category, does the deck need to be built around both Kuriboh and Winged Kuriboh, or will building it around one of them be sufficient? I'll enter if it's the latter. Also, I interpret the last restriction to say that I can have no more than 3 different monsters whose ATK exceeds 1000, although I can have as many copies of those different monsters as would normally be permitted. Am I correct in this interpretation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legolover09 Posted August 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 it's the later only need one to be acepted to your later question you are correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.