CrabHelmet Posted August 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Anyway' date=' that doesn't solve the real problem of Burn decks. So yeah, we'd need one. However, I bet that Konami would misunderstand it and make the card destroy only face-up S/Ts.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Anyway' date=' that doesn't solve the real problem of Burn decks. So yeah, we'd need one. However, I bet that Konami would misunderstand it and make the card destroy only face-up S/Ts.[/quote'] Which is why we need more members like Crab and less members like Kartexgamer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blade Knight Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 they would never do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 I thought heavy storm was the vortex-ized ersion of harpies feather duster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Anyway' date=' that doesn't solve the real problem of Burn decks. So yeah, we'd need one. However, I bet that Konami would misunderstand it and make the card destroy only face-up S/Ts.[/quote'] Which is why we need more members like Crab and less members like Kartexgamer...Point taken. +rep for you, Crab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 So much misinformation, never we mind how the GameFAQs group can't even function half as well as it used to if the TC's TC post is the quality of thought that comes out of them without my guidance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.