HORUS Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Machine Aggro MONSTERS: 171 Jinzo2 Cyber Dragon3 Kycoo the Ghost Destryoer3 Blue Thunder T-453 Cyber Phoenix1 Sangan1 Card Trooper1 Morphing Jar1 Spirit Reaper SPELLS: 193 My Body as a Shield3 Shrink2 Enemy Controller1 Brain Control1 Monster Reborn1 Premature Burial1 Heavy Storm1 MST1 Lightning Vortex1 Smashing Ground1 Hammer Shot1 Fissure1 Pot of Avarice1 Limiter Removal1 Swords of Revealing Light TRAPS: 42 Bottomless Trap Hole1 Mirror Force1 Torrential Tribute SIDE DECK (not final) 1 Drillroid1 Nobleman of Crossout3 Light-Imprisoning Mirror3 Shadow-Imprisoning Mirror3 Royal Oppression3 Pulling the Rug1 Royal Decree I don't have Solemn Judgment, Dark Bribe, Dimensional Prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Bottomless instead of Saku maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 I was thinking of that, but I'll have to test both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benraino Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Bottomless over Sakurestsu. Fissure over Hammer Shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Sakurestu Armor was run in threes before, now it's pointless. Especially now that Dimensional Prison does the same thing, but better. That way, it can't become food for DAD or JD, ect. Edit: Oh yeah, I forgot Zombies too. Dimensional Prison beats Sakurestu Armor in nearly every way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Bottomless beats both D-Prison and Saku. D-Prison and Saku are both not chainable and are both food for JD or DAD. Bottomless can kill both despite the fact they can still destroy something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Solemn > D-Prison, Saku, and Bottomless. Looks like a good deck. Could be annoying I bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Solemn > Bottomless > D-Prison' date=' Saku Looks like a good deck. Could be annoying I bet.[/quote'] Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Needs overload fusion. ~sasukechidori58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Needs overload fusion. ~sasukechidori58I don't see any fusions. Do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Sorry, Then add that and a chimeratech in. ~sasukechidori58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Bottomless Trap Hole is not chainable because you cannot chain to a summon. Still, Bottomless is better and I will add it. I might add an Overload fusion and test that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 ' pid='977939' dateline='1218900652']Bottomless Trap Hole is not chainable because you cannot chain to a summon. Lolwut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 ' pid='977939' dateline='1218900652']Bottomless Trap Hole is not chainable because you cannot chain to a summon. Lolwut? I'm pretty sure that's on the official site. A summon has no spell speed. I could be hugely mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 You are right you can't chain BTH to a summon but you can chain it to both DAD or JD's effect when they are used in response to their summon (aka when you opponent ask priority) if they don't use their player priority then you can activate your BTH in response to the summon of a monster. (wordings in YGO are important : a response is different then chaining to, just like discard and send are not the same and many more example exist to confuse all of us) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Well you can't chain BTH to DAD or JD's effect, but you can activate it in response. It's not a chain. A response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 No they form a chain it's just that the timing for the activation of BTH is right (the monster was sp summoned). If you were saying that you can't chain BTH when JD (or DAD) is already on the field and activate is effect then you're right, but i'm talking about the situation when the monster is sp summon and the player uses his player priority to activate the effect of JD/DAD then you chain BTH to the effect only because the timing is right (its like a combo of chain/response in that situation, see it like you chain to the effect and respond to the summon at the same time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Android is correct, JD is summoned with priority, you chain BTH to the effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Okay. Does that mean I am correct that you can't chain to a summon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Everything that Android said is correct, you do not chain to a summon you respond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.