Jump to content

See how long you can keep the thread alive... (prizes awarded to winners)

Willieh

By Willieh
in Games

Recommended Posts

Yasu Newbie

Yasu

Posted
Posted

There have been several Pokémon CDs that have been released in North America, most of them in conjunction with the theatrical releases of the first three Pokémon films. These releases were commonplace until late 2001. On March 27, 2007, a tenth anniversary CD was released containing 18 tracks from the English dub; this was the first English-language release in over five years. Soundtracks of the Pokemon feature films have been released in Japan each year in conjunction with the theatrical releases.

Year Title

Jun\

* Simple English

* Slovenčina

* Slovenščina

* Suomi

* Svenska

* Tagalog

* ไทย

* Türkçe

* 中文

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 691
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yasu Newbie

Yasu

Posted
Posted

ere never released outside of Japan.[7] Afterwards, a further enhanced remake titled Pokémon Yellow: Special Pikachu Edition was released to partially take advantage of the color palette of the Game Boy Color, as well as to feature more elements from the popular Pokémon anime. This first generation of games introduced the original 151 species of Pokémon (in National Pokédex order, encompassing all Pokémon from Bulbasaur to Mew), as well as the basic game concepts of capturing, training, battling, and trading Pokémon with both computer and human players. These versions of the games take place within the fictional Kanto region, though the name "Kanto" was not used until the second generati

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neiko Newbie

Neiko

Posted
Posted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica, no article in Wikipedia undergoes formal peer-review process and changes to articles are made available immediately. No article is owned by its creator or any other editor, or is vetted by any recognized authority. Except for few vandalism-prone pages that can be edited only by administrators, every article may be edited anonymously or with a user account, while only registered users may create a new article. Consequently, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content.[35] Wikipedia also does not censor itself, and it contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive or pornographic.[36] For instance, in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of Muhammad's depictions in its English edition, citing this policy. The presence of politically sensitive materials in Wikipedia had also led China to block the access to parts of the site.[37]

 

Content in Wikipedia, however, is subject to the laws (in particular copyright law) in Florida, United States, where Wikipedia servers are hosted, and several editorial policies and guidelines that are intended to reinforce the notion that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and thus is worthy of inclusion. A topic is deemed encyclopedic if it is "notable"[38] in the Wikipedia jargon; i.e., if it has received significant coverage in secondary reliable sources (i.e., mainstream media or major academic journals) that are independent of the subject of the topic. Second, Wikipedia must expose knowledge that is already established and recognized.[39] In other words, it must not present, for instance, new information or original works. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to reliable sources.[40] Within the Wikipedia community, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers are left themselves to check the truthfulness of what appears in the articles and to make their own interpretations.[41] Finally, Wikipedia does not take a side.[42] All opinions and viewpoints, if attributable to external sources, must enjoy appropriate share of coverage within an article.[43] Wikipedia editors, as a community, write and revise those policies and guidelines[44] and enforce them by deleting and modifying article materials failing to meet them, though there exists no mechanism to guarantee the adherence. (See also Deletionism and inclusionism[45][46])

 

 

Editors keep track of changes to articles by checking the difference between two revisions of a page, displayed here in red.Contributors, registered or not, can take advantage of features available in the software that empowers Wikipedia. The "History" page attached to each article contains every single past revision of the article, though a revision with libelous content, criminal threats or copyright infringements may be removed afterwards.[47][48] The feature makes it easy to compare old and new versions, undo changes that an editor consider undesirable, or restore lost content. The "Discussion" pages associated with each article are used to coordinate work among multiple editors.[49] A regular contributor often maintain a "watchlist" of articles of interest to him, so that he can easily keep tabs on all recent changes to those articles. Computer programs called bots have been used widely to remove vandalism as soon as it was made,[17] or start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.

 

The open nature of the editing model has been central to any form of criticism on Wikipedia. For example, at any point, a reader of an article cannot be certain, without consulting its "history" page, whether or not the article she is reading has been vandalized. Critics argue that non-expert editing undermines quality. Because contributors usually submit edits, rewriting small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Historian Roy Rosenzweig noted: "Overall, writing is the Achilles' heel of Wikipedia. Committees rarely write well, and Wikipedia entries often have a choppy quality that results from the stringing together of sentences or paragraphs written by different people."[50] All of these led to the question of the reliability of Wikipedia as a source of accurate information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yasu Newbie

Yasu

Posted
Posted

472 "Dawn of a New Era!"

"Pochama versus Subomie! Hikari's First Battle!!" (ポッチャマ対スボミー!ヒカリ初バトル!! Potchama tai Subomī! Hikari hatsu Batoru!!) October 5, 2006 June 7, 2007

Ash and Dawn have started traveling together but they are already having problems getting along with each other. Wanting to get Ash to acknowledge her power, she challenges Pokémon minstrel Nando to a battle. The two later find out that Nando is undecided about whether to challenge Gyms or Contests, causing Ash and Dawn to try and persuade him to challenge their preferred competitions.

473 "Gettin' Twiggy with It!"

"Naetle! I'll Get You!" (ナエトル！ゲットだぜ！ Naetoru! Getto da ze!) October 19, 2006 June 11, 2007

Ash knocks down Team Rocket's hot-air balloon, who had captured Pikachu, with Starly. A wild Turtwig saves Pikachu from the balloon which had fallen into a distant lake. However, Turtwig starts getting defensive for Pikachu and won't let any human near it. Turtwig soon realizes that Ash is his friend instead of Team Rocket so when Ash and the others accompany Turtwig with his friend Claire, Turtwig wants to be with Ash more and more, especially after Ash saves them fro

lolololol

y: Erina Nakayama (drama CD), Aya Endo (anime), Karen Strassman (English)

Miyuki is a young lady from a wealthy family who is beautiful, smart, and well-mannered. She always uses extremely polite Japanese, even when talking with her closest friends. She was the class president for her grade level in her first year, at the same time that she became good friends with Kagami. Now Miyuki is in the same class as Konata and Tsukasa, and is nicknamed "Yuki-chan" by Tsukasa. Miyuki's classmates often rely on her for help with their studies, and she is often shown giving impromptu but highly-detailed, encyclopedic definitions or explanations on diverse and obscure matters.

 

She is described as a stereotypically friendly meganekko, or glasses-wearing girl. She is scared of contacts, and of putting them in her eyes, thus why she wears glasses. Her vision is less than 20/200,

* Playing LS Moe Drill*

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yasu Newbie

Yasu

Posted
Posted

Traditionally, insanity or madness is the behaviour whereby a person flouts societal norms and may become a danger to himself and others. Greek tragedies and Shakespeare often refer to madness in this sense. Psychologically, it is a general, popular and legal term defining behaviour influenced by mental instability. In modern usage, it is most commonly encountered as an informal, unscientific term, or in the narrow legal context of the insanity defense. In the medical profession the term is now avoided in favour of more specific diagnoses of mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.[1] When discussing mental illness in general terms, "psychopathology" is also considered a preferred descriptor.[2]

Contents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...