Void Old Posted August 5, 2008 Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 It's a lesser Trap Dustshoot and a Cold Wave built into 1 card, could be decent in LS and beatdowns due to its minor versatility. What are your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 5, 2008 Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 Trap Dustshoot is far superior in the first role, due to its ability to pick and choose. Also, the first effect doesn't actually get rid of anything, it's more like a PWWB than a Dustshoot. The second effect is decent though, I'd say this could easily see play in the place of Cold Wave, as IMO it's better, since it only applies to the opponent's turn, and the ideal time to play it is the beginning of the duel anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Void Old Posted August 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 Yeah. Lesser Trap Dustshoot effect is just a little bonus, the 2nd effect is the main reason for using it. Although I could see the 1st effect being better in certain situations where you're trying to develop a hand advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Only good in the first turn. To me it looks like a situational Time Seal and Cold Wave in the form of a Trap Card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 This card is actually not bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Cold Wave / Time Seal put together into one card? Pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axiom_Nor Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 Man, this is actually kinda sweet... I may side deck this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 This card is actually not bad Because your opponent will always have exactly four cards in their hand, right? Could be good with Brionac. :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 Hm... Maybe with Kuraz. I wouldn't use this card else where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axiom_Nor Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 This card is actually not bad Because your opponent will always have exactly four cards in their hand' date=' right? Could be good with Brionac. :3[/quote'] oh... damn, i thought it was 4 or more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 This card is actually not bad Because your opponent will always have exactly four cards in their hand' date=' right? Could be good with Brionac. :3[/quote'] you can activate in the draw phase, before s/he has a chance to change it from four. makes it a most annoying card. computers that have do it all the time to me, but then computers are cheep asses, and stupid, not waiting for the right moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 This card is actually not bad Because your opponent will always have exactly four cards in their hand' date=' right? Could be good with Brionac. :3[/quote'] oh... damn, i thought it was 4 or more... i thought the same thing until that was pointed out. it is good, but extremely situational. it isnt very often that you can have this card and your opponent has four cards.. if it is, good for you! i would say maybe side deck, but this isnt Main Deck material.. not in my opinion. -Kale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 Not bad. Was actually looking at this yesterday and thinking of how to use it...Not bad if you dustshoot and chain this, you can slow them down early in the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 WTF THIS CARD IS F****** AMAZING WHY HAS THIS NOT SEEN PLAY WHAT THE HELL WHO HAS LESS THN 4 CARDS IN HAND OMG I MUST GET 3 OF THEESE :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 WTF THIS CARD IS F****** AMAZING WHY HAS THIS NOT SEEN PLAY WHAT THE HELL WHO HAS LESS THN 4 CARDS IN HAND OMG I MUST GET 3 OF THEESE :| It has to be exactly 4 Toni, as tea.leaf pointed out. Still not bad, but that's the reason it hasn't seen more play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 ooh wait exactly 4 ¬_¬ righ tokay good card is good :L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Too situational. Useful in the first few turns, stinks in the late game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Maybe add some of these in Monarch decks, and manipulate your opponent's hand by descreasing it with Thestalos, and increasing it with Kuraz. It's too bad it only can be used when your opponent has 4 cards, but it's pretty good in the first few turns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Situational as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 This card is actually not bad Because your opponent will always have exactly four cards in their hand' date=' right? Could be good with Brionac. :3[/quote'] you can activate in the draw phase, before s/he has a chance to change it from four. makes it a most annoying card. computers that have do it all the time to me, but then computers are cheep asses, and stupid, not waiting for the right moment. i thought there was a rule that a turn officially starts AFTER the normal draw had been done. Isn't that why people still had one turn after exchange of spirit went off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.