ShinobiDark72 Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Hot artwork is hot, the effect is decent for Spellcaster decks as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Lol, beatstick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Lol' date=' beatstick.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 I like the art.Could be better, meh at beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 THIS...IS...MY...BEATSTICK!!!!!! Crap card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Lol' date=' beatstick.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 like the pic,never expect TCG to do thatgood for spellcaster beatdown decks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 lolatk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzaman Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Seems to establish that nice card art = mediocre effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Void Old Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Seems to establish that nice card art = mediocre effects. Usually. Felgrand was a major example. But there are some out there with nice art and effects, DAD has a nice picture, Stardust does too. But yeah, a lot of good cards have terribad pictures, like Goyo Guardian and Zombie Carrier. This card is a waste of a Rare slot in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzaman Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Seems to establish that nice card art = mediocre effects. Usually. Felgrand was a major example. But there are some out there with nice art and effects' date=' DAD has a nice picture, Stardust does too. But yeah, a lot of good cards have terribad pictures, like Goyo Guardian and Zombie Carrier. This card is a waste of a Rare slot in my opinion.[/quote']I agree about Goyo, but Carrier actually looks cute once you stare at it in your hand for long enough.It looks like it's smiling at you, and offering to carry your bag. And imo, Stardust's head looks like a squid :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 lolsquid I would use this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 lolatk So I take it Burn is the way to go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 It would suck if you get about 10 spell counters on it and have them use Magic Cylinder though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted August 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 ^ Who uses Magic Cylinder outside of Burn again?, and when was Burn playable this format? Also, it may be a lolbeatstick, but its a hotlolbeatstick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 I use Magic Cylinder in almost every deck. It's a very good offensive defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 It would suck if you get about 10 spell counters on it and have them use Magic Cylinder though. ^ And what makes you think a beat stick the game will last twenty turns? (lolfinalcountdown) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Uhhh...most games do. Don't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 ^ Where have you been for this meta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 What's a meta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 LOL card. LOL Magic Cylinder. Magic Cylinder is terrible and not Chainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Seriously, what's a meta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Seriously' date=' what's a meta?[/quote'] Metagame is the way the game is currently played in a given area. Specifically' date=' when players talk about the metagame (or 'meta', for short), they talk about which decks and strategies are the most dominant in their area of play; for instance, a Chaos Control metagame has a heavier-than-normal influx of Chaos Control Decks being played. Metagames are generally dictated by a number of factors, primarily the popularity of certain decks or strategies at the time, the cards that are available in that area, and the current state of the Semi-Limited/Limited/Forbidden lists (If the area plays by the Traditional or Advanced Format). [/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Oh, okay. Thank you. I would have to say that volcanic decks are the meta here. They're kind of cheap. The only thing I have that can beat them is my CB's. Anyways, I'll keep that in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.