JerryFreelance Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 All right all right... Maybe I'll make another one... Prolly not though... I'm okay with the entry.. And the only way you don't have a guarantee is if your opponent has FGD or DMK, or traps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Here is my entry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryFreelance Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Here is my entry. Whoa... That card is hell with Raiza. I like it, even though it could probably be banned fairly easily because of the abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 I figured, they got no effects like that. But it would prob. be limited cause its a tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 wolfberserker your card is rather unfair, under the circumstances that you could have 80 monsters in your graveyard and deal, in one turn, 8000 life points. Though that in itself is very particular, Konami makes cards so that their effects depend on the proportions of the opponent. Such as the amount of cards in his/her graveyard. Besides, they're not burn monsters, they're destructive monsters. And moderator, yes, you've noticed that my card is situation, but so is Zaborg in destroying a monster, or mobius in destroying spells/traps, or granmarg in destroying a face-down card, or Thestalos if your opponent has any cards in his/her hand. Mine is situational, but so are all of the Monarchs, that's why in a Monarch deck, the user has a selection of various Monarchs from which to choose. Yours, on the other hand, is a decent effect, but it doesn't very much go with the scheme of Monarchs. If you're offended, then change it, like I did twice or three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Instinct Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 [attachment=3712] Here's mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Wow instinctmeister, if that's not the most ironic thing that's happened in awhile, I don't know what is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 I think the "Shadow Monarch" is being rather overused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncheng1997 Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Wow instinctmeister' date=' if that's not the most ironic thing that's happened in awhile, I don't know what is.[/quote'] u are very picky and trying to make people feel bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 wolfberserker your card is rather unfair' date=' under the circumstances that you could have 80 monsters in your graveyard and deal, in one turn, 8000 life points. Though that in itself is very particular, Konami makes cards so that their effects depend on the proportions of the opponent. Such as the amount of cards in his/her graveyard. Besides, they're not burn monsters, they're destructive monsters. And moderator, yes, you've noticed that my card is situation, but so is Zaborg in destroying a monster, or mobius in destroying spells/traps, or granmarg in destroying a face-down card, or Thestalos if your opponent has any cards in his/her hand. Mine is situational, but so are all of the Monarchs, that's why in a Monarch deck, the user has a selection of various Monarchs from which to choose. Yours, on the other hand, is a decent effect, but it doesn't very much go with the scheme of Monarchs. If you're offended, then change it, like I did twice or three times.[/quote'] who has 80 monsters in there deck? that effect is very fair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 I happen to agree. What idiot would put 80 monsters in a deck. I say like 30 at max, maybe a few more. IDK thats just me. I play 40 card deck, but w/e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Don't agree, that isn't the point. It doesn't matter what idiot puts 80 cards in his deck, some idiots still put a lot, and the fact that it's under your control completely is unfair. Konami makes it so that it depends on the propotions of the opponent. Logically. Besides, it still isn't Monarch-like, whether or not it's fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quagmire_jr Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 No. I highly doubt wolf would put 80 cards in a deck, plus, IT's a fair effect. If ur gonna complain about a card, do it right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I did do it right. I told him that whether or not it's fair it's not monarch-like. If you're going to read what I said, read it entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red-eyes Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Here is my entry hope U like it it is a card from my new set coming up My Monarch Cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I did do it right. I told him that whether or not it's fair it's not monarch-like. If you're going to read what I said' date=' read it entirely.[/quote']Hey, stop this, NOW! it's getting annoying, you are trying to make them feel bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Don't get so emotional over nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I think it's more to lock your opponent in some fashion' date=' and normally there is a guarantee. That effect isn't monarch-worthy first of all, and I strongly believe you could have given it more effort than a practical Shrink Knock-off. It isn't torture, as I've said, it's lock. Destruction, returning and whatnot.[/quote'] Sorry to jump in, but MONARCHS EFFECTS ALWAYS GIVE YOU ADVANTAGE OR A 1 FOR 1. Halving ATK and DEF and discarding from the deck is nothing like a monarch's effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necrophia Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 You just agreed with me, so why did you quote me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naruto9169 Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I hope this contest is not finsh but heres mine just quickly i hope you like it (sorry just updating to let the card show so it has the correct file on it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 contest ends tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryFreelance Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I think it's more to lock your opponent in some fashion' date=' and normally there is a guarantee. That effect isn't monarch-worthy first of all, and I strongly believe you could have given it more effort than a practical Shrink Knock-off. It isn't torture, as I've said, it's lock. Destruction, returning and whatnot.[/quote'] Sorry to jump in, but MONARCHS EFFECTS ALWAYS GIVE YOU ADVANTAGE OR A 1 FOR 1. Halving ATK and DEF and discarding from the deck is nothing like a monarch's effect. Dammit Sartorius!!!!! Now I have to make mine over again. Maybe. I'll see. We'll see. Meh, I prolly won't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God GAK Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 My Entry:[attachment=3753] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.