Dad Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Personally I'm undecided about this one: Raiza with a cost? How abusable/usable is it? What's your opinion? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VainZiler Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 It's an easy to counter card with three effects that can be used to either players advantage, (Activating a spell, discarding a card, sending a monster to the deck) so it's a rather fair card in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 This should go in TCG, No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 didnt we already have this discussion?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 This belongs in the TCG section ~Clariex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 This should go in TCG' date=' No?[/quote'] Zomg, I haz quoted myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Yes, and you have also spammed! ~Clariex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Yes' date=' and you have also spammed! ~Clariex[/color'] Shhhh, they don't know that! Meh, I'll report the thread to get it moved. Because I'm that cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Somebody was at a board meeting when this card happened, this is the conversation: Person 1: Okay so we could make like this dragon card that has the effect I just explainedBoss: Not a bad idea john...Hey Bill what's your idea?Person 2: zzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzZZZzzzBoss: Bill it's your turn to discuss your idea!!!!Person 2: ZZZZzzzZZZZ- Huh...what?Boss: What's your idea for a card?person 2: Umm.... We could make a card based off the game "Life"...and call it "Back to square one..."Boss: It sounds stupid....BUT IT JUST MIGHT WORK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRoyale Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 Phoenix Wing Wind Blast owns this.because it can force your opponent to waste destruction effect targets to kill it.Plus, it can target spell/traps, which is MUCH deadlier, IMO.Makes for much more of a dead draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 I already made this thread. >_< Yesterday. Anyway, I think that t might be interesting to try out with the popularity of PWWB and the way this things faster and un-Jinzo/Decree/MST-able. Yes' date=' and you have also spammed! ~Clariex[/quote'] So have you, to a larger degree than KA Flame. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 its substituteable till you get better like PWWB. It can have deadly effects though, like if your opponent just pulled out plasma and you put it back on top of there deck, epic lol. Or if someone pulls out like BEUD or DMK or FGD put it back. Ehh card is ehh.Raiza with a cost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 It's faster than Phoenix Wing Wind Blast, which has already been established as a good card. It's inability to target S/T is actually a pretty big deal, though it becomes less important if you live somewhere where chainable S/T are the rage. (I do.) PWWB also has the advantage of being able to wait until it gets hit by a piece of your opponent's S/T removal before chaining to spin something. Overall, fair card is fair, though PWWB is superior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 It's faster than Phoenix Wing Wind Blast' date=' which has already been established as a good card. It's inability to target S/T is actually a pretty big deal, though it becomes [b']less important if you live somewhere where chainable S/T are the rage[/b]. (I do.) PWWB also has the advantage of being able to wait until it gets hit by a piece of your opponent's S/T removal before chaining to spin something. Overall, fair card is fair, though PWWB is superior. They're the rage pretty much everywhere, making S/T targeting useless, if you target a chainable with PWWB you -2 for no reason, which is never good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted July 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 I already made this thread. >_< Yesterday. Anyway' date=' I think that t might be interesting to try out with the popularity of PWWB and the way this things faster and un-Jinzo/Decree/MST-able. [/quote'] My apologies Doom Wraith. I knew nothing about a similar thread. If it pleases the mods, this can be locked or deleted. Again, I apologize. ~Ken-chan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 It's faster than Phoenix Wing Wind Blast' date=' which has already been established as a good card. It's inability to target S/T is actually a pretty big deal, though it becomes [b']less important if you live somewhere where chainable S/T are the rage[/b]. (I do.) PWWB also has the advantage of being able to wait until it gets hit by a piece of your opponent's S/T removal before chaining to spin something. Overall, fair card is fair, though PWWB is superior. They're the rage pretty much everywhere, making S/T targeting useless, if you target a chainable with PWWB you -2 for no reason, which is never good. True dat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.