tekkaman01 Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 What are your thoughts on this card?Discuss. Be careful what you say, you never know who will read this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 The MST version of Giant Trunade. I'm gonna back away slowly and watch players get humiliated from a safe distance because honestly, I don't see it and I can't wait to see what "it" is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxas80 Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 I can really only think of one time this card would be useful (and it's not that likely): Say your opponent's field looks like this: -Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV8 -Jinzo -Amplifier (obviously equipped to Jinzo) -Mask of Restrict -Ground Collapse (activated prior to Horus' summoning so its not negated) If your opponent also used Ojama Trio, you'd be pretty much screwed since now you can't summon, and you can't use Spell or Traps. If, by sheer coincidence, you had Spiritualism, a Lava Golem, and an MST/Heavy Storm in your hand, you could use Spiritualism (since it can't be negated) to return Mask of Restrict to your opponent's hand, then bring out Lava Golem by tributing your opponent's Jinzo and Horus, and activate an MST/Heavy Storm to get rid of Ground Collapse, thus breaking a nearly perfect lock (although I suppose you now have to deal with Lava Golem, but...) So... other than that, I don't know why you wouldn't just use MST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 I can really only think of one time this card would be useful (and it's not that likely): Say your opponent's field looks like this: -Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV8 -Jinzo -Amplifier (obviously equipped to Jinzo) -Mask of Restrict -Ground Collapse (activated prior to Horus' summoning so its not negated) If your opponent also used Ojama Trio' date=' you'd be pretty much screwed since now you can't summon, and you can't use Spell or Traps. If, by sheer coincidence, you had Spiritualism, a Lava Golem, and an MST/Heavy Storm in your hand, you could use Spiritualism (since it can't be negated) to return Mask of Restrict to your opponent's hand, then bring out Lava Golem by tributing your opponent's Jinzo and Horus, and activate an MST/Heavy Storm to get rid of Ground Collapse, thus breaking a nearly perfect lock (although I suppose you now have to deal with Lava Golem, but...) So... other than [i']that[/i], I don't know why you wouldn't just use MST. Oh yeah, that isn't situational as hell. Second, I'd just wait for one or two of the tokens to die, and then normal summon. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Bad card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Bad card is bad. NEXT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 The only use this card has is against Destiny Board, which sucks anyway. Other than that, this card is pretty useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 This card isnt as bad as people put it out to be. It can not be negated at all and if it were quickplay, im willing to bet if it would be played alot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 lol from text: Return 1 Magic Card English Edition cards are called spells lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 That's only because they hadn't changed it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 I know its retarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 before they were spells, they were magic's. This is proof of the golden days... aww lets all just reminisce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 before they were spells' date=' they were magic's. This is proof of the golden days... aww lets all just reminisce.[/quote'] The Golden Age where decks were all different from each other...no monarchs...*sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 So what's the trap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekkaman01 Posted July 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 The trap is that it is an ok card for OTK decks sense it can't be negated at best. I just got bored and wanted to see if someone was going to start an argument about how great it "secretly" is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 huh? For otk purposes, why not just Heavy, cold wave, or trunade? It makes for just better otk support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekkaman01 Posted July 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 So your telling me that a card that cannot be stopped is not o.k. in an OTK deck? I run it in my Demise OTK that isn't the greatest anymore do to lack of ARA, however if my opponent only has one face down waboku or threatening roar they cannot chain to my activation because that would negate the effect, and the effect cannot be negated. I didn't say great, I didn't even say good, I just said o.k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 ^Mabey the part of my previous post where i said This card isnt as bad as people put it out to be. It can not be negated at all and if it were quickplay, im willing to bet if it would be played alot more. would have led me to AGREE with you, but still... you have to admit its just not better than the other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 So your telling me that a card that cannot be stopped is not o.k. in an OTK deck? I run it in my Demise OTK that isn't the greatest anymore do to lack of ARA' date=' however if my opponent only has one face down waboku or threatening roar they cannot chain to my activation because that would negate the effect, and the effect cannot be negated. I didn't say great, I didn't even say good, I just said o.k.[/quote'] wrong wrong wrong... the fact that this card is not negated it means that you can't use solemn or magic jammer on it, NOT that you can't chain the targeted card... lack of target =/= negated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.