NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatt Mann Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 Multiply it's original DEF by 100! Other than that....tad powerful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan und Jamie Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 You tell us that it has a normal attack (2000) and then instead of saying its defence is 8, you tell us its attack is 8... other than that, good card :) ~Allan8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 What an interesting card. It's special because it came from a dream; that tends to happen to me a lot as well. This card doesn't seem overpowering to me. It does require 1 Tribute to summon and it only really gets overpowering later in the Duel. Nice image. The 8 DEF is a tad strange, but it works since it was part of the dream. I'm giving this card a 8/10. Nice card and idea. I wonder what future dreams will hold... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=aTaLiG= Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 nice... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 Very weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 I like the 8 DEF points, its something new. The card itself isn't bad. 7.2/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomiCar Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 I'l give you 9/10. Because of 8 DEF points... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 This is not a bad card, but Spell Card and Graveyard need to be capitalized. The name and picture seem rather weird to me, but since they are supposed to be based on a dream, I suppose it's okay.There is not much to say about such cards in general, but I hope your dreamscape will pop out some other rather unusual cards in the future^.^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aemilius Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 Interesting.. like it!!! 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 DELETED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Change 8 to 1800, good pic and effect. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caon Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 cool man the only thing i find strange is the 8 defence? I know it's a dream card but still other than that it's an awesome card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexeaus Posted July 21, 2008 Report Share Posted July 21, 2008 i like the pic oddcard but it's a new idea so 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.