Guest Star Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 [spoiler=Effect]This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When this face-down card is attacked, inflict 1000 damage to the player that attacked it. This card is extremely useful in Monarchs, or any Deck that uses Tribute Monsters. What do you think of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Extremely good but limited to one. Spirit Reaper is better and you could instead max out Arcana Force 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Kirby Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 lol i hear that they was bring out a dark marshmallon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Nice card, I have it in my deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 I also play it in my Monarch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 I would play it if I had it but in the meantime Fools are a reasonable substitute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 I would play it if I had it but in the meantime Fools are a reasonable substitute.I'll just let you borrow mine for a while:). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Spirit Reaper is better. It can be taken care of more easily but it also has a useful effect outside of it's walling ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 But Mallon is still good:). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Mallon's slight burn would only be good if it wasn't limited to one. Spirit Reaper is definately the best of the immortal monsters however it's destroyed when targeted so it does have a major weakness. Fools are better then Marshmallon in my opinion because you can run three of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 But Mallon is still really really really really really really good:). Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Mallon's slight burn would only be good if it wasn't limited to one. Spirit Reaper is definately the best of the immortal monsters however it's destroyed when targeted so it does have a major weakness. Fools are better then Marshmallon in my opinion because you can run three of them. That's bad logic. The number of possible cards being run does not effect the individual playability of that card unless it is abusable with multiple copies of itself. Marshmallon is better (in a monarch deck), though there isn't much of a difference, as 1000 burn damage isn't that big of a deal. However, The Fool was used to much success in a Counter Fairy deck that ran Nova Summoner, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Kirby Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 have you guy got this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 have you guy got this card? You can't compare beauty to a beast... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Kirby Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 nah im just saying that they both can not be destroyed by battle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 nah im just saying that they both can not be destroyed by battle And so can't cards with Mist Body...point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Mallon's slight burn would only be good if it wasn't limited to one. Spirit Reaper is definately the best of the immortal monsters however it's destroyed when targeted so it does have a major weakness. Fools are better then Marshmallon in my opinion because you can run three of them. That's bad logic. The number of possible cards being run does not effect the individual playability of that card unless it is abusable with multiple copies of itself. Marshmallon is better (in a monarch deck)' date=' though there isn't much of a difference, as 1000 burn damage isn't that big of a deal. However, The Fool was used to much success in a Counter Fairy deck that ran Nova Summoner, I believe.[/quote']I agree that an individual Marshmallon is better then a Fool but I think you would be better served to try and get many copies of the Fool then looking for Marshmallon since it's basically like having three Marshmallons without the burn element. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Then why wouldn't you just run 1 Marshmallon and 2 Fools? People tend to use just 1 Spirit Reaper and 1 Marshmallon in their decks, even now with The Fool's release. That's because they find 2 indestructible monsters to be the appropriate number for their deck. (As running too many leads to horrible draws.) I did run 1 each of The Fool, Mallon, and Reaper in my Monarch deck at one point, but I had to cut Fool for other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Seeing every one say Mallon is making me lol since my last name is Mallon. Good card, helpful in most noncompetitive decks. In competitive play I don't see it have much use out side of Monarch. Also, to those talking about Fools number, it should/will be put to 1 on the next ban list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Then why wouldn't you just run 1 Marshmallon and 2 Fools?That's exactly what I intend to do' date=' I marsh, 2 fools and a reaper. At least until I find something better to replace them with (as soon as I get Valleys they are out the window.) People tend to use just 1 Spirit Reaper and 1 Marshmallon in their decks, even now with The Fool's release. That's because they find 2 indestructible monsters to be the appropriate number for their deck. (As running too many leads to horrible draws.) I agree entirely. But if you had to choose one, it would be Fool since you can include multiples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Spirit Reaper = Hand Rape > Marshmallon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 looks yummyand cant be destroyedso its like marshmallow gum YUCK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Changing your name doesn't stop you from sucking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 I'm assuming that was directed at Master of Dark World? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 No *filler* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.