Guest Star Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 The title is untrue. Now then, my question is, do you think a card's rarity should affect its place on the ban list? I don't think it should. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 You lying son of a- No, a broken card is broken. No matter how rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 No, look at Snipe Hunter. What was it a common? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Rarity shouldn't be a factor... but look at JD and DAD. Both at 3. Both secret rare. Both broken (DAD is less now...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Off course not. That's all I can say here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Obviously it should. A player willing to put more into the game should have a better chance of winning, especially when prizes are on the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 What if that player is poor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Skilled Players should win games skill=/=rich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 What if that player is poor? Me, being a prime example? I believe not. That would just make Yu-Gi-Oh! even MORE of a rich-man's game than it already is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Prizes are for the rich. Fools. THIS IS CAPITALISM! Investing is key. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Static, I don't agree with you on that :(. I believe prizes should belong to those who deserve them, and to those who build solid and original decks, and not to all those cheap ass players who use DAD/JD/Glad Beasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 i see statics views but nope its not quite right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Prizes are for the rich. Fools. THIS IS CAPITALISM! Investing is key. No persons are more frequently wrong' date=' than those who will not admit they are wrong.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 last will... nuff said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 last will... nuff said... I mentioned that in the other thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 oh... then... chaos sorcerer, nuff said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 TIME SEAL. Have you all forgotten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest setojim Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 dark hole COME ON GUYS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Monster Rebor- oh wait.. P.S. GB Decks are relativley cheap to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 this is obvious:no... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 ]The title is untrue. Now then' date=' my question is, do you think a card's rarity should affect its place on the ban list? I don't think it should. Discuss.[/quote'] Dude, are you just regurgitating everything all us Gamefaqs people said about... 5 months ago!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Rarity should not effect a cards place on the banlist. Unfortunately Konami doesn't think so and keeps CCV and Gold Sarc limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 ]The title is untrue. Now then' date=' my question is, do you think a card's rarity should affect its place on the ban list? I don't think it should. Discuss.[/quote'] Dude, are you just regurgitating everything all us Gamefaqs people said about... 5 months ago!? Yes I would know, I taught the lot of you GF kids all of the stuff he's regurgitating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Rarity SHOULDN'T effect its spot. HOWEVER rarity DOES because konami and UDE are money hungry bastards. excuse my french. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 No. No way. Never. There are some rare cards are really bad. I can give examples but I couldnt care less. Anyway the bad ones dont deserve a place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.