Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Yes yes, I'm aware of turn advantage, but if you know you can live through it, it's not as though it's something totally terrible. =/ I'm the type to analyze and analyze some more, weighing pros and cons and what not, but sometimes it just gets to the point where I'm just gonna go with it because over-thinking things gets annoying. If I'm giving them one free attack by switching in, oh well. It's better than leaving Stealth Rocks on the field. If I lose a Pokemon, oh well, if it did its job before fainting I can be happy with that.Bear in mind, though, that I only worry about Stealth Rocks if an important pokemon in my party is weak to it. I see no sense in avoiding Flying types like the plague just because Stealth Rock has been added to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 In a Garchomp metagame, turn advantage is everything. If your opponent has even 1 turn advantage, they have time to set up a Swords Dance. A Swords Dance Yache Garchomp with 252 attack EVs, will OHKO everything in the game that doesn't 4x resist it or is immune to it with Earthquake (true fact), and is impossible to take down without at least 2 hits (unless you have over 427 special attack and use Ice Beam, or 398 special attack and use Blizzard). So, if you give your opponent +1 turn advantage, you have basically given them a chance to kill two of your Pokemon in exchange for one of theirs, and that is at the best. At the worst (say, in Sandstorm, and Sand Veil kicks in at the wrong time), you have lost the entire match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 So by your logic....am I 10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Maybe. Depends how cynical I'm feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 =/ Again, over-thinking things like that takes fun away from the game. Those may be true facts, but not everything always works out perfectly. Taking down Garchomp is a lot easier than most people think it is, even after setup. I know as much because I have done it on several occasions. My bottom line is that I like to have fun when I play Pokemon. And I'm not having fun if I start fretting over a few number advantages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Maybe. Depends how cynical I'm feeling. But I has pics Am I 14 again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Aeon: Ah, but I play to win. Advantage is everything. Also, I see you haven't faced Yache Chomp yet. You can't OHKO it without taking damage unless you a) kill it on the switch (and even then, you need 398+ spec. attack, 334+ speed, and Blizzard), or b) get a critical hit. On the other hand, once Swords Danced, it OHKOs everything in OU except Bronzong, Celebi, Cresselia, and Gliscor. There is a reason Garchomp is being tested for Ubers. Clariex: if you admit you are 14, it's probably alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I'm the world's oldest looking 10 year old =DÂ Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 -.- I don't need High Special Attack to OHKO it. I have faced Yache chomp, and yes, I cans till OHKO it or THKO without Losing the Pokemon in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 But that's impossible, as the Yache Berry prevents that from happening. EDIT: Oh, without losing a Pokemon? Nah, you've just had a bad opponent, mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 -_- You know, there is such a thing as obscure strategies. Just because you've never heard of it, doesn't mean it can't happen. It is quite possible. And trust me, I've had some bad opponents, but this was no bad opponent. I just happen to be a very good opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 What move did you make, then? In order to 2HKO without being damaged, you'd need a Pokemon with a decent sp. atk and Ice Beam, who is faster than Garchomp, and has a resistance to Earthquake, meaning you can bring it in on the switch. Trouble is, that Pokemon doesn't exist. Closest you get is HP Ice Azelf, or Sceptile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I never said the Pokemon didn't take damage. I said it didn't die. I can THKO without the user dieing, and I can OHKO, but the user will most likely die immediately afterward. Either way, it gets rid of the Garchomp problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Yep. If you OHKO, that's one of your Pokemon lost, plus the one Garchomp has already killed, and if you have to 2HKO, the Chomp will just switch. Either way, you lose team advantage/turn advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 The chomp will not be able to switch away from the THKO, as it has Persuit to finish the job. The OHKO will likely be killed after it kills Garchomp, true, but Garchomp will not have already killed something before hand. I'm smarter than that. If my opponent is going to use Garchomp, I'm not going to allow it kill anything of mine unless it becomes necessary. Advantage me. Garchomp is acting on my terms, and my opponent doesn't know it till it's too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Chomp will always kill something in the right hands. Also, Pursuiting a YacheChomp? In order to do enough damage through Yache so that Pursuit can kill it, you must be using a Weavile (stabbed Ice Beam, and stabbed Pursuit). Which automatically shows how bad your opponent is. If they have a Yachechomp, they'll switch out the minute they see a Weavile. Plus, it could be a ScarfChomp, in which case you now have one dead Weavile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Nope, not Weavile. -_- Something else. And the thing is, I'm not going to tell you what, as it eliminates the element of surprise assuming I ever battle you. I understand that given your cynical nature, you will take that to assume that I'm making this up, but I don't really care about that. I do not use Weavile, and my Pursuit user is more than capable of killing Garchomp on the second hit, and will not itself die. It's actually a relatively simple strategy. But I'll leave it to you to keep guessing what it is. Unless of coarse you battle me outright, in which case you can see for yourself what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 List of fully evolved, non-Uber, non-Weavile Pokemon which learn a) Ice Beam, and b) Pursuit. 359: Absol 206: Dunsparce 477: Dusknoir 419: Floatzel 409: Rampardos 20: Raticate 143: Snorlax 128: Tauros 335: Zangoose 31: Nidoqueen 334: Altaria 279: Peliper It will need to be faster than Swords Dance Chomp, and able to survive at least one hit, or slower than Swords Dance Chomp, and able to survive two hits. It is impossible to survive two hits from a properly EV'd Swords Dance Garchomp unless you resist Dragon AND Ground. This applies to Skarmory and Bronzong only. 419: Floatzel (assuming Rain Dance) It's a Floatzel. If it isn't a Floatzel, I stand by my point - your opponent wasn't very good, as they haven't EV'd their YacheChomp properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Apparently this is now a Pokémon discussion club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 -_- It is not a Floatzel. I never said I was using Ice Beam. EDIT: o_O My God, Clair is right. This has gotten out of hand. T-T I should feel ashamed of myself for going so off-topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Alright, a list of Pursuit Pokemon, excluding all the ones mentioned. 142: Aerodactyl 15: Beedrill 85: Dodrio 22: Fearow 214: Heracross 107: Hitmonchan 237: Hitmontop 430: Honchkrow 376: Metagross 254: Sceptile 212: Scizor 227: Skarmory 442: Spiritomb 454: Toxicroak 197: Umbreon 416: Vespiquen 469: Yanmega  Again, they have to be faster than Chomp. 142: Aerodactyl 254: Sceptile 469: Yanmega  They can also all survive a switch-in. Any of the above three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 =/ Nope. Dude, you're just not getting it. ^_^ Starts with an "R". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Rampardos, Raticate, or Rhyperior? None of those are faster than Chomp, and all will be faster if the Chomp has an SD and ecent EVs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 You were close with that last one. And it doesn't need to be faster. The idea is actually to be slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I hate you, no really I do. >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.