Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Limit AF 0 - The Fool. Combined with something like Curse of Fiend' date=' it's industroctable.

[/quote']

 

 

so?? enemy controler over him and you are forced to tribute next turn... it's very pointless to limit a ard that don't give real advantage...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest PikaPerson01

Atem's list is alright. This is an inferior list that could stand to look more similar to his. How is that not "on-topic"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could' date=' but then I would have to re limit the Limbs of Exodia. I'll think about it.

[/quote']

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

wow, how do you think the actual ban-list was made? just throwing in a bunch of cards to limit?

so in other words you DO have to "think about" what cards need to be banned or limited...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could' date=' but then I would have to re limit the Limbs of Exodia. I'll think about it.

[/quote']

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

wow, how do you think the actual ban-list was made?

 

By Konami examining the decklists of the decks that win the most, and then thinking about what they should do about said decks.

 

You're an idiot if you think that your post does anything but support what I said earlier.

 

I'll explain through dissecting the rest of your post.

 

just throwing in a bunch of cards to limit?

 

No. All lists think about their choices.

 

so in other words you DO have to "think about" what cards need to be banned or limited...

 

Yes.

 

NOWHERE in my original post did I say that he was misguided for the action of thinking in and of itself.

 

Here's the post' date=' for posterity:

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

If you had appreciable amounts of reading comprehension at your disposal, you'd realize why your reply to my post... is inane and useless.

 

The post OBVIOUSLY means only one thing. It means that "[The TC has] no business making a list, because [he] _________."

 

There's only ONE correct solution for this little fill-in-the-blank problem.

 

The correct solution is not "had to think".

 

The correct solution is "had to think about the Exodia matter".

 

He has no business making a list, simply because it's notoriously obvious that it is illogical to reconsider Limiting 4 cards that do no harm to the game, for the sake of Deprohibiting and Relimiting 1 card that can be seen as harmful.

 

Rethinking something wherein he already had the right answer... is stupid. That's why he has no business making lists; he took a perfectly logical conclusion and tossed it out the window.

 

Why the **** did SOS Haruhi bump this crap?

 

It's a lulz factory. Don't question it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could' date=' but then I would have to re limit the Limbs of Exodia. I'll think about it.

[/quote']

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

wow, how do you think the actual ban-list was made?

 

By Konami examining the decklists of the decks that win the most, and then thinking about what they should do about said decks.

 

You're an idiot if you think that your post does anything but support what I said earlier.

 

I'll explain through dissecting the rest of your post.

 

just throwing in a bunch of cards to limit?

 

No. All lists think about their choices.

 

so in other words you DO have to "think about" what cards need to be banned or limited...

 

Yes.

 

NOWHERE in my original post did I say that he was misguided for the action of thinking in and of itself.

 

Here's the post' date=' for posterity:

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

If you had appreciable amounts of reading comprehension at your disposal, you'd realize why your reply to my post... is inane and useless.

 

The post OBVIOUSLY means only one thing. It means that "[The TC has] no business making a list, because [he] _________."

 

There's only ONE correct solution for this little fill-in-the-blank problem.

 

The correct solution is not "had to think".

 

The correct solution is "had to think about the Exodia matter".

 

He has no business making a list, simply because it's notoriously obvious that it is illogical to reconsider Limiting 4 cards that do no harm to the game, for the sake of Deprohibiting and Relimiting 1 card that can be seen as harmful.

 

Rethinking something wherein he already had the right answer... is stupid. That's why he has no business making lists; he took a perfectly logical conclusion and tossed it out the window.

 

Why the **** did SOS Haruhi bump this crap?

 

It's a lulz factory. Don't question it.

 

wow kid... you were wrong, and then you go splicing up my sentences to prove that you were somehow right!?

 

no one is perfect

stop going around and acting like it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could' date=' but then I would have to re limit the Limbs of Exodia. I'll think about it.

[/quote']

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

wow, how do you think the actual ban-list was made?

 

By Konami examining the decklists of the decks that win the most, and then thinking about what they should do about said decks.

 

You're an idiot if you think that your post does anything but support what I said earlier.

 

I'll explain through dissecting the rest of your post.

 

just throwing in a bunch of cards to limit?

 

No. All lists think about their choices.

 

so in other words you DO have to "think about" what cards need to be banned or limited...

 

Yes.

 

NOWHERE in my original post did I say that he was misguided for the action of thinking in and of itself.

 

Here's the post' date=' for posterity:

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

If you had appreciable amounts of reading comprehension at your disposal, you'd realize why your reply to my post... is inane and useless.

 

The post OBVIOUSLY means only one thing. It means that "[The TC has] no business making a list, because [he] _________."

 

There's only ONE correct solution for this little fill-in-the-blank problem.

 

The correct solution is not "had to think".

 

The correct solution is "had to think about the Exodia matter".

 

He has no business making a list, simply because it's notoriously obvious that it is illogical to reconsider Limiting 4 cards that do no harm to the game, for the sake of Deprohibiting and Relimiting 1 card that can be seen as harmful.

 

Rethinking something wherein he already had the right answer... is stupid. That's why he has no business making lists; he took a perfectly logical conclusion and tossed it out the window.

 

Why the **** did SOS Haruhi bump this crap?

 

It's a lulz factory. Don't question it.

 

wow kid... you were wrong' date='[/quote']

 

Prove it.

 

Protip: you won't be able to. It's because I was - and still am - right.

 

and then you go splicing up my sentences to prove that you were somehow right!?

 

You describe something that is impossible to do. This is because you describe the performance of a contradiction.

 

no one is perfect

 

I never said or implied that anyone ever was' date=' nor did I do anything else to bring "people acting perfect" into this topic.

 

You're so emotional about this that you're jumping to stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think. It'd best serve you to cool off before you reply.

 

stop going around and acting like it...

 

See, that's similar to what I meant when I said that you're so emotional about this that you're jumping to stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think.

 

Of course, the difference here is that instead of making stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think, you're making them about how I'm acting or not acting.

 

Go cool off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could' date=' but then I would have to re limit the Limbs of Exodia. I'll think about it.

[/quote']

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

wow, how do you think the actual ban-list was made?

 

By Konami examining the decklists of the decks that win the most, and then thinking about what they should do about said decks.

 

You're an idiot if you think that your post does anything but support what I said earlier.

 

I'll explain through dissecting the rest of your post.

 

just throwing in a bunch of cards to limit?

 

No. All lists think about their choices.

 

so in other words you DO have to "think about" what cards need to be banned or limited...

 

Yes.

 

NOWHERE in my original post did I say that he was misguided for the action of thinking in and of itself.

 

Here's the post' date=' for posterity:

 

Having to "think about" the Exodia matter... shows that you have no business making a list.

 

If you had appreciable amounts of reading comprehension at your disposal, you'd realize why your reply to my post... is inane and useless.

 

The post OBVIOUSLY means only one thing. It means that "[The TC has] no business making a list, because [he] _________."

 

There's only ONE correct solution for this little fill-in-the-blank problem.

 

The correct solution is not "had to think".

 

The correct solution is "had to think about the Exodia matter".

 

He has no business making a list, simply because it's notoriously obvious that it is illogical to reconsider Limiting 4 cards that do no harm to the game, for the sake of Deprohibiting and Relimiting 1 card that can be seen as harmful.

 

Rethinking something wherein he already had the right answer... is stupid. That's why he has no business making lists; he took a perfectly logical conclusion and tossed it out the window.

 

Why the **** did SOS Haruhi bump this crap?

 

It's a lulz factory. Don't question it.

 

wow kid... you were wrong' date='[/quote']

 

Prove it.

 

Protip: you won't be able to. It's because I was - and still am - right.

 

and then you go splicing up my sentences to prove that you were somehow right!?

 

You describe something that is impossible to do. This is because you describe the performance of a contradiction.

 

no one is perfect

 

I never said or implied that anyone ever was' date=' nor did I do anything else to bring "people acting perfect" into this topic.

 

You're so emotional about this that you're jumping to stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think. It'd best serve you to cool off before you reply.

 

stop going around and acting like it...

 

See, that's similar to what I meant when I said that you're so emotional about this that you're jumping to stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think.

 

Of course, the difference here is that instead of making stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think, you're making them about how I'm acting or not acting.

 

Go cool off.

 

oh my gosh kid

take into account your own words "you're jumping to stupid conclusions about what I do or don't think. It'd best serve you to cool off before you reply."

I was cooled off... dont jump to the conclusion that I was not

 

and as for the ban list thing

you only proved my point further above... way up there ^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...