~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Ok, here's my list. Please note that it only contains sets up to LOTD, so I don't want any "y noo zombecarrier roflmao noob." I may add cards from TGDS and CTC later, but for now it's just up to LoDT. Anyway, here it is, feel free to comment and suggest. Ok, here goes. I. Forbidden CardsYou cannot use these cards in your Deck, Fusion Deck or Side Deck. BLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNINGBREAKER THE MAGICAL WARRIORBUTTERFLY DAGGER - ELMACALL OF THE HAUNTEDCard of Safe Return (Too many infinite draws and cheap combos.)CHANGE OF HEARTCHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON - ENVOY OF THE ENDCHAOS SORCERERCONFISCATIONCrush Card VirusCYBER JARCYBER-STEINDARK HOLEDark Armed DragonDELINQUENT DUODestiny Hero - Disk CommanderDIMENSION FUSIONElemental Hero PrismaEXCHANGE OF THE SPIRITFIBER JARGold Sarcophagus (Screw rich people. XD)Gladiator Beast Bestiari (Kill Gyzarus. Also, I'm banning this instead of just Gyzarus because it's a Breaker in GB that can summon other GBs)Gladiator Beast Lacquer (Now Heraklinos dies.)GRACEFUL CHARITYHARPIE'S FEATHER DUSTERIMPERIAL ORDERJudgment Dragon (LS dies now.)LAST TURNLAST WILLMAGICAL SCIENTISTMAGICIAN OF FAITHMAKYURA THE DESTRUCTORMETAMORPHOSISMIRAGE OF NIGHTMAREPAINFUL CHOICEPOT OF GREEDOverload FusionRAIGEKIRING OF DESTRUCTIONSINISTER SERPENTSNATCH STEALTHE FORCEFUL SENTRYTHOUSAND-EYES RESTRICTTIME SEALTreeborn FrogTRIBE-INFECTING VIRUSTSUKUYOMIVICTORY DRAGONWITCH OF THE BLACK FORESTYATA-GARASU NEW! - Card of Safe Return, Crush Card Virus, Dark Armed Dragon, Destiny Hero - Disk Commander, Elemental Hero Prisma, Gladiator Beast Bestiari, Gladiator Beast Lacquer, Gold Sarcophagus, Judgment Dragon, Treeborn Frog. II. Limited CardsYou can ONLY use one of the following cards in the Deck, Fusion Deck & Side Deck combined. Allure of Darkness (Draw power is a big problem.)D.D.R. - Different Dimension ReincarnationD. D. WARRIOR LADYADVANCED RITUAL ARTBRAIN CONTROLCaius the Shadow MonarchCARD DESTRUCTIONCARD TROOPERCEASEFIRECHAIN STRIKECyber Valley (Got to be the most versatile card there is.)DARK MAGICIAN OF CHAOSDestiny Draw (Die draw Die!)Destiny Hero - Dasher (We all needed this.)DIMENSION FUSIONELEMENTAL HERO STRATOSEXODIA THE FORBIDDEN ONEFISSUREFUTURE FUSIONGIANT TRUNADEGladiator Beast Murmillo (Cheap)Grandmaster of the Six SamuraiGRAVITY BINDGreat Shogun ShienGREEN BABOON, DEFENDER OF THE FORESTHEAVY STORMLEFT ARM OF THE FORBIDDEN ONELEFT LEG OF THE FORBIDDEN ONELEVEL LIMIT - AREA BLIMITER REMOVALKuraz the Light Monarch (Too versatile, too many options, too many combos; Appropriate etc. ><)MAGIC CYLINDERMARSHMALLONMEGAMORPHMIND CRUSHMIRROR FORCEMONSTER REBORNMORPHING JARMYSTICAL SPACE TYPHOONNEO-SPACIAN GRAND MOLENIGHT ASSAILANTNOBLEMAN OF CROSSOUTOJAMA TRIOPREMATURE BURIALRAIZA THE STORM MONARCHRETURN FROM THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONRIGHT ARM OF THE FORBIDDEN ONERIGHT LEG OF THE FORBIDDEN ONESANGANSCAPEGOATSMASHING GROUNDSNIPE HUNTERSolar Recharge (Mwahahaha)SPIRIT REAPERSWORDS OF REVEALING LIGHTTest TigerTHE TRANSMIGRATION PROPHECYTORRENTIAL TRIBUTETrade-In (Yay!)TRAP DUSTSHOOTTREEBORN FROGTWIN-HEADED BEHEMOTHULTIMATE OFFERINGUNITED WE STANDWALL OF REVEALING LIGHT NEW! - Allure of Darkness, Caius the Shadow Monarch, Cyber Valley, D.D.R. - Different Dimension Reincarnation, Destiny Draw, Destiny Hero Dasher, Gladiator Beast Murmillo, Grandmaster of the Six Samurai, Great Shogun Shien Kuraz the Light Monarch Solar Recharge, Test Tiger, Trade-In, Solar Recharge III. Semi-Limited CardsYou can ONLY use two of the following cards in the Deck, Fusion Deck & Side Deck combined. BOOK OF MOONCYBER DRAGONDESTINY HERO - MALICIOUSFOOLISH BURIALGravekeeper's SpyLIGHT AND DARKNESS DRAGONMAGE POWERMAGICAL STONE EXCAVATIONMASK OF DARKNESSNECROFACEREINFORCEMENT OF THE ARMYROYAL DECREE NEW! - Gravekeeper's Spy Please comment and suggest. ^_^ Thinking about doing something to DDR, any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 No card needs to be Semi-Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 No card is semi-limited except for Konami's Semi-Limited cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 That's not the point. Their is no card that is good at 2.Only 0, 1, or 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 That's ot the point. Their is not card that is good at 2.Only 0' date=' 1, or 3.[/quote'] I don't quite understand the way you worded that. Your grammar is somewhat confusing. :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 The only Gladiator Beast that should even be considered for banning is Gyzarus, and Limiting a card that can't combo with itself and is searchable by every other monster in its deck - LOLWUT. Also, you've randomly banned Prisma and Limited Test Tiger. Is it your goal to commit genocide against the Gladiator Beasts? The random D-Hero, Monarch, and Six Samurai Limits are hilariously bad, as are the Draw Limits. What makes Cyber Valley so Limit-worthy? Also, you kept Dark Armed Dragon legal. Instant fail. Oh, by the way, killing Judgment Dragoon doesn't kill LS. It just removes the brokenness from LS. That's ot the point. Their is not card that is good at 2.Only 0' date=' 1, or 3.[/quote'] I don't quite understand the way you worded that. Your grammar is somewhat confusing. :? He means you should have taken all of the currently Semi-Limited cards and moved them to a new position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 That's not the point. Their is no card that is good at 2.Only 0' date=' 1, or 3.[/quote'] I don't quite understand the way you worded that. Your grammar is somewhat confusing. :?Forgot the "n" and added a "t". My bad. If you still don't get it no card should be Semi-Limited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Also, why is Crush Card Virus limited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 The only Gladiator Beast that should even be considered for banning is Gyzarus' date=' and Limiting a card that can't combo with itself and is searchable by every other monster in its deck - LOLWUT. Also, you've randomly banned Prisma and Limited Test Tiger. Is it your goal to commit genocide against the Gladiator Beasts? The random D-Hero, Monarch, and Six Samurai Limits are hilariously bad, as are the Draw Limits. What makes Cyber Valley so Limit-worthy? Also, you kept Dark Armed Dragon legal. Instant fail.[/quote'] That's one opinion. Murmillo was limited so that you couldn't use Secutor to bring out 2 for field advantage. Bestiari was limited to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. (No pun intended) Bestiari was basically a GB Breaker which could evolve into Gyzarus. Lacquer was taken out to deal with Heraklinos. Dark Armed Dragon was limited because now that Dimension Fusion and RFtDD have been stamped on by Konami, it doesn't rival Judgment Dragon and limiting is all it needs. Dasher was the only D-Hero limited, it caused huge problems with its broken Special Summon effect, so it got limited. Monarchs were next up in line, so they were punished, Treeeborn was banned and their 2 new top guns, Kuraz and Caius were limited. Drawing was becoming a huge problem, the speed in it was terrifying, no deck should be able to draw through over half their deck first turn, drawing was punished accordingly. Disk was banned. Valley, Ddraw, Recharge, Trade-In, and ALlure were limited. I had to utterly obliterate GBs, since they were blasting all other decks to shreds as new builds were being discovered. Shogun and Grandmaster were limited to stop the swarming threat of Six Samurai which would've dominated in the meta had I not put them on here. Crush Card was kept limited because I didn't feel it was to the point of banworthy. It also takes care of Monarchs, which were becoming a problem. I feel the cards I added to the list are justified, it would be helpful if anyone could suggest something that should be on here or what to do about DDR P.S: Now that I've banned CoSR, Manticore is no longer a problem and has been unlimited. I've also limited Gravekeeper's Spy. Flame: Why not? Cards that caused trouble in 3s and aren't quite limit-worthy do exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I'll explain this nicely, which Crab and co are unable to do. Semi'ing does almost nothing to drawing ratios. If a card is semi'd, it might as well be unlimited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I'll explain this nicely' date=' which Crab and co are unable to do. Semi'ing does [b']almost[/b] nothing to drawing ratios. If a card is semi'd, it might as well be unlimited. Yes, but it does something. It cuts down the draw chance by 33.3333etc.%, which makes all the more impact since I'm cutting down on draw effects, and stops the overabuse of effects like those of Malicious, Necro Gardna, Apprentice, and Spy. Now that you mention it, I think I'll Semi Spy now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 The only Gladiator Beast that should even be considered for banning is Gyzarus' date=' and Limiting a card that can't combo with itself and is searchable by every other monster in its deck - LOLWUT. Also, you've randomly banned Prisma and Limited Test Tiger. Is it your goal to commit genocide against the Gladiator Beasts? The random D-Hero, Monarch, and Six Samurai Limits are hilariously bad, as are the Draw Limits. What makes Cyber Valley so Limit-worthy? Also, you kept Dark Armed Dragon legal. Instant fail.[/quote'] That's one opinion. Murmillo was limited so that you couldn't use Secutor to bring out 2 for field advantage. Bestiari was limited to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. (No pun intended) Bestiari was basically a GB Breaker which could evolve into Gyzarus. Lacquer was taken out to deal with Heraklinos. I know next to nothing about GB, so I could be making bad assumptions. If Secutor isn't on the field you don't get the effect, and since he only has 400 ATK odds are he will not be on the field after he attacks. 90% of Spell and Traps that are used are chain able making Bestiari's effect limited in use, especially since you need to have a GB attack to use his effect in the first place. Heraklinos is fine at 3, so Lacquer is fine at 3.Dark Armed Dragon was limited because now that Dimension Fusion and RFtDD have been stamped on by Konami, it doesn't rival Judgment Dragon and limiting is all it needs.So your saying that dropping a 2800 ATK beatstck on to the field that kills 3 cards shouldn't be banned?Dasher was the only D-Hero limited, it caused huge problems with its broken Special Summon effect, so it got limited. No it doesn't. My friend uses Dasher in his high level swarm deck and has never been a problem.Monarchs were next up in line, so they were punished, Treeeborn was banned and their 2 new top guns, Kuraz and Caius were limited.Monarchs shouldn't be limited in.Drawing was becoming a huge problem, the speed in it was terrifying, no deck should be able to draw through over half their deck first turn, drawing was punished accordingly. Disk was banned. Valley, Ddraw, Recharge, Trade-In, and ALlure were limited. So why not limit Accumulated Fortune? Also Allure should be banned, while the rest only work in their own decks.I had to utterly obliterate GBs, since they were blasting all other decks to shreds as new builds were being discovered.Their a good deck type and so should do wellShogun and Grandmaster were limited to stop the swarming threat of Six Samurai which would've dominated in the meta had I not put them on here.They would have dominated because the list isn't goodCrush Card was kept limited because I didn't feel it was to the point of banworthy. It also takes care of Monarchs, which were becoming a problem.lol noI feel the cards I added to the list are justified, it would be helpful if anyone could suggest something that should be on here or what to do about DDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 1st bold: I disagree about Heraklinos being fine, and Secutor can still attack defense position monsters without any problems FYI. 2nd bold: Well, it's watered down a lot and Judgment Dragon is still better, compare DAD to Chaos Emperor. With D-Fusion banned and RFtDD limited, it's really not as much of a problem. 3rd bold: Not for him, maybe for his opponent. 4th bold: Raiza already has, and Caius and Kuraz are neck in neck with Raiza. 5th bold: Just because GBs are good type and do well, brokenly well, doesn't mean they shouldn't be banned. 6th bold: That's one opinion. I still felt they should be taken out. 7th bold: You're gonna have to say more than just "lol no" if you want me to change my mind about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I'll explain this nicely' date=' which Crab and co are unable to do. Semi'ing does [b']almost[/b] nothing to drawing ratios. If a card is semi'd, it might as well be unlimited. Yes, but it does something. It cuts down the draw chance by 33.3333etc.%, which makes all the more impact since I'm cutting down on draw effects, and stops the overabuse of effects like those of Malicious, Necro Gardna, Apprentice, and Spy. Now that you mention it, I think I'll Semi Spy now. >.<Malicious is still abused.Necro Gardna is still abused.Apprentice is still abused.If Gigaplant were Semi'd, it would still be abused.Gravekeeper's Spy is still abused.Semi'ing does nothing to abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 1st bold: I disagree about Heraklinos being fine' date=' and Secutor can still attack defense position monsters without any problems FYI.[b']In order to use his effect you must discard cards, plus monster effects still kill him. Ok, but monster are only played in defense if the player is losing meaning you should be able to destory any defense monster with ease, since you in turn would be winning[/b] 2nd bold: Well, it's watered down a lot and Judgment Dragon is still better, compare DAD to Chaos Emperor. With D-Fusion banned and RFtDD limited, it's really not as much of a problem.No it isn't, and if you want to compare, Emperor is better than Judgment, so Judgment should be at 1 too. Pro tip, don't compare a broken card to a more broken card to say it isn't broken3rd bold: Not for him, maybe for his opponent.I guess I should have added "for me".4th bold: Raiza already has, and Caius and Kuraz are neck in neck with Raiza.Raiza shouldn't be at 15th bold: Just because GBs are good type and do well, brokenly well, doesn't mean they shouldn't be banned.How do they do "brokenly well?" From what I've read they only ever done well.6th bold: That's one opinion. I still felt they should be taken out.If it's your opinion I'm not going to try to make you change it since you don't seem to want to.7th bold: You're gonna have to say more than just "lol no" if you want me to change my mind about it.A card that prevents your opponent form using any monster with more than 1400 ATK for 3 turns is broken. It's that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 They do brokenly well because they're dominating the metas. Have you seen herak in action? The fact that it works in your opponent's turn too makes iti cheap. It's basically a really easy to summon Horus which has the added feature of destroying traps at the cost of having to discard to negate. Then maybe your friend isn't using Dasher properly. Raiza should be at one because of it's lock and presence and devestation to trib monsters. Monster form of PWWb without discard. Judgment shouldn't be at 1 because it nukes the field and does 3000 damage, it's practically a CED and its very existence is a disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 1st bold: I disagree about Heraklinos being fine' date=' and Secutor can still attack defense position monsters without any problems FYI.[b']In order to use his effect you must discard cards, plus monster effects still kill him. Ok, but monster are only played in defense if the player is losing meaning you should be able to destory any defense monster with ease, since you in turn would be winning[/b] Well, I agree somewhat here. Heraklinos can stay banned should Doom Wraith desire it, but Secutor shouldn't be.2nd bold: Well, it's watered down a lot and Judgment Dragon is still better, compare DAD to Chaos Emperor. With D-Fusion banned and RFtDD limited, it's really not as much of a problem.No it isn't, and if you want to compare, Emperor is better than Judgment, so Judgment should be at 1 too. Pro tip, don't compare a broken card to a more broken card to say it isn't brokenJD and DAD stay at the same ban level, the same way CED and BLS-EOTE do.3rd bold: Not for him, maybe for his opponent.I guess I should have added "for me".I see Doom's point here. A strict banlist should keep it out.4th bold: Raiza already has, and Caius and Kuraz are neck in neck with Raiza.Raiza shouldn't be at 1This is the first time I agree wholeheartedly with Doom.5th bold: Just because GBs are good type and do well, brokenly well, doesn't mean they shouldn't be banned.How do they do "brokenly well?" From what I've read they only ever done well.Doom hates GBs; that much is obvious. If Doom hates GBs, he has every right to keep them off the list.6th bold: That's one opinion. I still felt they should be taken out.If it's your opinion I'm not going to try to make you change it since you don't seem to want to.Neither do you.7th bold: You're gonna have to say more than just "lol no" if you want me to change my mind about it.A card that prevents your opponent form using any monster with more than 1400 ATK for 3 turns is broken. It's that simple.I HATE CCV. BAN IT FOREVER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I never banned Secutor. Since everyone approves of banning CCV and DAD, DAD and CCV are now banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 YAY DEATH OF CCV! DEATH TO CCV FOREVER! Remember in YGO:PoL when Deck Devastation Virus made you lose 30 cards in 3 turns? It would be a lol if DDV really worked like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 That would utterly pwn Lightsworn XD I don't hate GBs, I just personally don't think a theme that makes half the current meta decks should be ignored. I'm thinking of limiting D.D.R. and Reasoning. All in favor say Aye. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 They do brokenly well because they're dominating the metas. Have you seen herak in action? The fact that it works in your opponent's turn too makes iti cheap. It's basically a really easy to summon Horus which has the added feature of destroying traps at the cost of having to discard to negate.They have never "dominated the meta". Only done well. No' date=' but I know the fact that he doesn't stop monster effects is what keeps him from being good enough from being banned.[/b']Then maybe your friend isn't using Dasher properly. How can you not use Dasher properly? Raiza should be at one because of it's lock and presence and devestation to trib monsters. Monster form of PWWb without discard. But the main cards use to bring out any Monarch are banned so they are harder to get outJudgment shouldn't be at 1 because it nukes the field and does 3000 damage, it's practically a CED and its very existence is a disgrace.DAD shouldn't be at one since he gives you a 2800 ATK point monster who can kill at least 3 cards the second he comes out. CCV and DAD are gone. Good. DDR should be at 1. Reasoning, I think, should be at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 They do brokenly well because they're dominating the metas. Have you seen herak in action? The fact that it works in your opponent's turn too makes iti cheap. It's basically a really easy to summon Horus which has the added feature of destroying traps at the cost of having to discard to negate.they have never "dominated the meta". Only done well. No' date=' but I know the fact that he doesn't neget monster effects is what keeps him from being good enough from being banned.[/b']Doom hates GBs the same way I hate Cyber Dragons, so I respect this hatred. Leave a loather at peace, Flame.Then maybe your friend isn't using Dasher properly. How can you not use Dasher properly? By being a n00b. There's a lot of them on YCM.Raiza should be at one because of it's lock and presence and devestation to trib monsters. Monster form of PWWb without discard. But the main cards use to bring out any Monarch are banned so they are harder to get outAnd? I personally limit Kuraz, Caius, and Raiza (the latter due to Transmigration Break).Judgment shouldn't be at 1 because it nukes the field and does 3000 damage, it's practically a CED and its very existence is a disgrace.DAD shouldn't be at one since he gives you a 2800 ATK point monster who can kill at least 3 cards the second he comes out.The thing is, JD destroys all monsters, while DAD gives you much more strategic precision. They're equal to each other, and should meet each other on the banlist. I say aye to DDR and nay to Reasoning (FOR NOW). In related news, LET'S ALL DANCE ON THE ASHES OF CCV!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 1. They have dominated the meta, at US nationals 6 GB decks top 16'd and Chris Bowling won with GBs. For more information: http://www.metagame.com/yugioh.aspx?tabid=33&ArticleId=9762 It's not that I hate GB it's just that I can't ignore decks which destroy the meta. 2. How can you not use Dasher properly? You can select non-Dasher targets when you use Foolish or Armageddon Knight or you can not use his Special Summon effect at the right time. 3. Treeborn is banned. That doesn't stop monarchs, click on the link I posted and look at the first deck. It's a monarch deck without Treeborn by Adam Corn. 4. I just banned DAD >_> In other news, D.D.R. is now limited. Now, what should be done about Phoenix Wing Wind Blast? I'm thinkin' limit, all in favor say aye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 1. They have dominated the meta' date=' at US nationals 6 GB decks top 16'd and Chris Bowling won with GBs. For more information: http://www.metagame.com/yugioh.aspx?tabid=33&ArticleId=9762 It's not that I hate GB it's just that I can't ignore decks which destroy the meta. [b']DAD did just as well. IMO they aren't destorying the meta, just doing well.[/b]2. How can you not use Dasher properly? You can select non-Dasher targets when you use Foolish or Armageddon Knight or you can not use his Special Summon effect at the right time. Friend doesn't have Foolish or Armageddon, and he does use the effect when he needs it.3. Treeborn is banned. That doesn't stop monarchs, click on the link I posted and look at the first deck. It's a monarch deck without Treeborn by Adam Corn.With out Treeborn, Monarchs are still good, but won't control the meta as they did before.4. I just banned DAD >_>I saw that after I postedIn other news, D.D.R. is now limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Bold 1: They won't now that DAD's banned. Bold 2: Then your friend needs to get Foolish and Armageddon Bold 3: They could've quite easily if Raiza, Kuraz, and Caius were run-in-3-able. Bold 4: Good, so now we don't have to worry about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.