HORUS Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Doesn't need to be banned. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I agree. Limit him to 1, like MST, but don't ban him. He isn't really as much as a threat in today's meta as he used to be a long while ago. His being a monster makes him significantly slower than MST, and Mirrors and Wraths are being sided and mained pretty frequently now, so he should come off the ban list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Free +1, punishes use of non-chainables, splashes into just about any deck in the game, kills most Level 4 or below monsters OR swings for 1/5 LP (depending on field situation). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 i disagree... is a +1 s/t removal that swings for 1600, highly splashable AND a dark monster to the service of DAD... i say burn the wi... errr, ban the spellcaster!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 =/ Meh, I wouldn't mind if it saw play again. I never even used the damn thing. Crab's got a few good points there, but it's still not as dangerous as it used to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 =/ Meh' date=' I wouldn't mind if it saw play again. I never even used the damn thing. Crab's got a few good points there, but it's still [b']not as dangerous as it used to be.[/b] so you're assuming that a broken card can become less broken?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Not assuming. Saying. I didn't say it was less broken. Just less dangerous - counter methods are more frequently seen. =/ look, I don't want this to explode into an argument. I don't have the energy for it. So do me a favor and just drop this me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 just think on this, counterability does NOT imply balance, by that logic chaos emperor dragon can be countered by solemn judgement and horn of heaven, so chaos emperor dragon deserves to be unbanned... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 just think on this' date=' counterability does NOT imply balance, by that logic chaos emperor dragon can be countered by solemn judgement and horn of heaven, so chaos emperor dragon deserves to be unbanned...[/quote'] -.- Dude, whatever you say. I don't care anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted June 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 Free +1' date=' punishes use of non-chainables, splashes into just about any deck in the game, kills most Level 4 or below monsters OR swings for 1/5 LP (depending on field situation).[/quote'] Your lists have Tribe-Infecting Virus Limited, correct? And I thought you said Mobius was bad because nobody runs non-chainables? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I got a misprint gold series back. Duplicates of one card. Breaker. -_-. The whole pack was crap. 2 Breaker, D.D. Warrior Lady, Heavy, and not a good common in sight. I want him unbanned. Plus not a threat. Lyla is better, you get priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.