Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 why is it so hard to appreciate the idea of "gyzarus at 1...bottomless that beya and stop worrying"? Because there is no guarantee that you will ever even draw your Bottomless. At 1, Gyz still does the same job that it had when it is at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If Bottomless phails, there's always Caius and PWWB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Gyzarus can be Summoned from the Fusion Deck. There is absolutely no reason to limit a monster that doesn't need to be in your hand, Deck, or Graveyard to activate. Seriously, when it's at 1, that's the same as it being at 3. Anyone that thinks this card should be at 1 or 2 is bad at this game, and this is being said by a person (me) who isn't good at this game. Learn to play better. [/topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If Bottomless phails' date=' there's always Caius and PWWB[/quote'] please learn2play... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If Bottomless phails' date=' there's always Caius and PWWB[/quote'] PWWB wouldn't prevent the opponent from just brining it out later, and Caius assumes that Gyz 1) leaves anything for the opponent to Tribute, and 2) that Gyz will still be on the field by the time you are able to do so. Also, Gyz isn't a Nomi, so it can come back from the RFP pile after it was Summoned by its effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 What's wrong with Caius? It takes out Gyzarus and you don't have to worry 'bout 'im. PWWB messes it up good by putting it in your opponent's hand when they draw. These are examples of things that > it were it to be limited. And Gyz doesn't have to leave you monsters for you to Summon Caius, it's a little thing called Special Summoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 What's wrong with Caius? It takes out Gyzarus and you don't have to worry 'bout 'im. PWWB messes it up good. These are examples of things that > it were it to be limited. The point is, even with Gyzarus at 1, there's no card that can prevent it from returning to the field after it has left the field, except for Non-Fusion Area, and who uses that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Impact™ Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 don't ban it or i'll be screwed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 What's wrong with Caius? It takes out Gyzarus and you don't have to worry 'bout 'im. PWWB messes it up good by putting it in your opponent's hand when they draw. These are examples of things that > it were it to be limited. And Gyz doesn't have to leave you monsters for you to Summon Caius' date=' it's a little thing called Special Summoning.[/quote'] please learn2play AND learn2reasoning... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 don't ban it or i'll be screwed than let the royal screwing begin! MWA HA HA HAAAA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 What's wrong with Caius? It takes out Gyzarus and you don't have to worry 'bout 'im. PWWB messes it up good by putting it in your opponent's hand when they draw. These are examples of things that > it were it to be limited. And Gyz doesn't have to leave you monsters for you to Summon Caius' date=' it's a little thing called Special Summoning.[/quote'] Except that Caius is, most likely, never going to get the chance to hit Gyz. Also, when a Fusion monster is sent back to the Deck by a card effect, it is sent to the Fusion Deck instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHERO Andrew Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 don't ban it or i'll be screwed Exactly! If Gyzarus gets Limited or Banned, my deck is screwed, thus I'll be screwed! Gladiator Beasts is the best I ever had! Without Gyzarus, Gladiator Beasts are as worthless as E-Heroes! Not that I don't like E-Heroes. In fact I use E-Heroes in my GB deck (Stratos and Prisma). In other words, whoever thinks that Gyzarus should be banned or limited is an idiot and a noob. NO ONE DISSES THE GLADIATORS!!! Those who have dueled agianst Gyzarus are upset that you got ass kicked by it! Deal with it! Gladiators have risen from the dead! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 don't ban it or i'll be screwed Exactly! If Gyzarus gets Limited or Banned' date=' my deck is screwed, thus I'll be screwed! Gladiator Beasts is the best I ever had! Without Gyzarus, Gladiator Beasts are as worthless as E-Heroes! Not that I don't like E-Heroes. In fact I use E-Heroes in my GB deck (Stratos and Prisma). In other words, whoever thinks that Gyzarus should be banned or limited is an idiot and a noob. NO ONE DISSES THE GLADIATORS!!! Those who have dueled agianst Gyzarus are upset that you got ass kicked by it! Deal with it! Gladiators have risen from the dead![/quote']I know. If they ban DAD my deck will be total crap. So let’s not ban him ether.[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 I know. If they ban Dmoc my Warrior deck will be total crap. So let’s not ban him ether.[/sarcasm]NEW GAME! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Pennar Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 don't ban it or i'll be screwed Exactly! If Gyzarus gets Limited or Banned' date=' my deck is screwed, thus I'll be screwed! Gladiator Beasts is the best I ever had! Without Gyzarus, Gladiator Beasts are as worthless as E-Heroes! Not that I don't like E-Heroes. In fact I use E-Heroes in my GB deck (Stratos and Prisma). In other words, whoever thinks that Gyzarus should be banned or limited is an idiot and a noob. NO ONE DISSES THE GLADIATORS!!! Those who have dueled agianst Gyzarus are upset that you got ass kicked by it! Deal with it! Gladiators have risen from the dead![/quote']I know. If they ban DAD my deck will be total crap. So let’s not ban him ether.[/sarcasm] ROFLMAO, I played against a GB deck Based on getting Gyzarus out and won, Big Time, With JD! >.> (he also had E-heros in that deck(Stratos and Prisma) and RotAs) and if they ban JD, I'm Screwed, i hope that they listen to my game and consult it for the next Ban list (Except JD that is) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHERO Andrew Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 [sarcasm] I know, how about we have no ban list at all![/sarcasm] Just kidding. Please don't flame me, but I think JD and DAD should be LIMITED (just be thankful I didn't say the "B" word). And I agree that Fusions shouldn't be Limited or Banned (though I don't know why Restrict is). I mean, if Gyzarus was SJ'd or got his summon negated, he can't be special summoned from the grave by cards like Prem. or Monster Reborn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.