CrabHelmet Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Except that Limiting a Fusion Monster is stupid. Come on, people. Even if you don't know the three Limitation conditions, you should at least be able to figure that much out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Wait, I know! Let's Limit Darius! It's not like he's searchable by pretty much every card in the deck or anything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 It makes no sense to Limit a Fusion Monster. There will never be a situation where a Fusion Monster should be limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 ]It makes no sense to Limit a Fusion Monster. There will never be a situation where a Fusion Monster should be limited. Thousand Eyes Restrict...look it up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 ]It makes no sense to Limit a Fusion Monster. There will never be a situation where a Fusion Monster should be limited. Thousand Eyes Restrict...look it up...Since when did Limit=Ban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Oh! Thousand-Eyes Restrict is Limited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 i mean really. you guys are so intent on saying limiting a fusion monster is stupid. cant i bottomless this? i sure would feel better about my BTH if there wasnt another one (gyzarus or w/e broken limited fusion) coming next turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 ]It makes no sense to Limit a Fusion Monster. There will never be a situation where a Fusion Monster should be limited. Thousand Eyes Restrict...look it up... TER at 1 is a sensible choice. Clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekkaman01 Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 As odd as this sounds, I actually wish to agree with HFC on this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If a card is broken, BTH is not going to stop it from being broken. 3 or 0. But there is actually a case where a Fusion might need to be Limited. There just aren't any applicable Fusions that exist yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekkaman01 Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If a card is broken' date=' BTH is not going to stop it from being broken. 3 or 0. But there is actually a case where a Fusion might need to be Limited. There just aren't any applicable Fusions that exist yet.[/quote'] I'm sorry, I thought you guys were trying to say that Gyzarus is fine at 3... I take back what I said earlier and vote for 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If a card is broken' date=' BTH is not going to stop it from being broken. 3 or 0. But there is actually a case where a Fusion might need to be Limited. There just aren't any applicable Fusions that exist yet.[/quote'] bth was just one example obv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If a card is broken' date=' BTH is not going to stop it from being broken. 3 or 0. But there is actually a case where a Fusion might need to be Limited. There just aren't any applicable Fusions that exist yet.[/quote'] bth was just one example obv And any card like it is still not going to stop a broken card from being broken. Counterability Does Not Imply Balance, remember? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Its not hard to understand why limiting a fusion monster is terrible, Lrn2play ppl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Limiting a fusion Monster wont make any difference. Just ban it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 The only real reason that a fusion monster should be limited is if a broken combo using 2 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 ^ Gyzarus doesn't have a combo, ya just summon it and kablam! so should it even be limited, by that sense? or what about rap the magic dragon? you only need 1 for the giga loop. ban rap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 blah blah ban rap! Only the last part of your sentence was good enough for me to read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 blah blah ban rap!blah blah blah waste of post blah blah Funny, i couldn't make any of yours out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Gladiator Beast Will Smith(Level 8/FIRE/Beast-Warrior/Fusion/3000/1500)Gladiator Beast Darius + 1 Gladiator Beast monster + 1 Gladiator Beast monsterEffect: This card can only be Special Summoned by returning the above cards from your side of the field to your deck. When this card is Summoned, if there exists 2 copies of "Gladiator Beast Will Smith" in your Fusion Deck or Graveyard, Special Summon both of them, ignoring summoning conditions. When this card is Summoned, draw 2 cards. The OCG might be off, but the principal is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 what did i said? fusions 3 or 0... no more no less... also TER was the stupid example of fusions can't be limited because it has no meaning... it was at 1 before it was banned... nothing changed, goat control only needed 1 TER... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 If a card is broken' date=' BTH is not going to stop it from being broken. 3 or 0. But there is actually a case where a Fusion might need to be Limited. There just aren't any applicable Fusions that exist yet.[/quote'] bth was just one example obv And any card like it is still not going to stop a broken card from being broken. Counterability Does Not Imply Balance, remember? it does IMO when the counter cards is so versatile that many would run it anyway for other puposes. and why do you say "remember" like I was ever convinced by anybody that "it doesnt matter if a card can be countered". that is a sweeping generalization which can be rebuffed in specific situations by a counter that will be run anyway and is versatile being able to be commonly countered by a versatile and unlimited playable card absolutely should be taken into account when thinking about a cards balance. now go ahead and regurgitate your ddcrow disk commander example everyone... why is it so hard to appreciate the idea of "gyzarus at 1...bottomless that beya and stop worrying"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 Solemn is widespread and is run in many decks. Chaos Emperor Dragon is stopped by Solemn. Unban Chaos Emperor Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 CED = gyzarus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 26, 2008 Report Share Posted June 26, 2008 why is it so hard to appreciate the idea of "gyzarus at 1...bottomless that beya and stop worrying"? because the existence of DDR, escape, RFTDD and the fact that gyzarus hasn't the word NOMI on it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.